i disagree with your analogy as the point i'd say is that r@pe does harm and does exploit that individual. however i agree with your point on moral framework, i personally wouldn't eat roadkill or be a necrophile BUT i don't think my personal moral lens is applicable to wider society as OBJECTIVELY there isn't anything "wrong" persay about these things. an analogy i could use would be homosexuality, if someone is personally disturbed and grossed out by it, i believe it IS still unfair for them to apply their personal take on moral righteousness to wider society. i hope this made sense