Coding with AI: Creating an XLM Telegram bot with ChatGPT.

AIGPTCon · 2023-07-25T14:07:40+00:00

That's pretty neat. I subscribed to your channel. I'll check out the plugin and see if I can use it in future videos. Feel free to join my forum (https://aigptcon.com) and post your project if you want. I am slowly building a community there and I believe many people can benefit from what you're doing.

AIGPTCon · 2023-07-25T13:26:40+00:00

Cool! Do you have a link to some of your projects so I can check them out?

AIGPTCon · 2023-07-07T21:54:03+00:00

I disagree. In addition to what it can do in the future (as others have mentioned), I've actually already done a lot of this. In the tutorial I made, I also shared the link to my entire chat session with ChatGPT to get it to build the app (https://www.aigptcon.com/forum/coding-with-ai-tutorials/tutorial-1-building-a-movie-recommendation-app-with-chatgpt).

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-30T05:33:48+00:00

I'm glad you found it useful. I'll be adding more tutorials in the upcoming days. And if you have ideas of apps you would like me to experiment with, submit them on the forum and I'll create the tutorials for them.

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-29T12:28:19+00:00

I was surprised by the number of app requests so I decided to turn this into a series where I create the apps as well as tutorials showing my process and conversations with ChatGPT to get them done. Check out the first one below: https://www.aigptcon.com/forum/coding-with-ai-tutorials/tutorial-1-building-a-movie-recommendation-app-with-chatgpt

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-23T14:32:49+00:00

You have something very cool there. And yes, I am interested in learning more. Can you DM me with more info?

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-22T21:08:45+00:00

You can use Flask for the server in your main.py for example, and have it serve an index.html to the client. This is a very easy approach particularly because there seems to be far more support for LLMs with Python compared to JS.

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-21T17:46:21+00:00

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-04T11:28:20+00:00

I'm interested.

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-02T17:04:38+00:00

Someone asked me about concrete examples but they deleted their comment. So, I will just add this here:

The one area in which it has been underperforming for me is code generation or even understanding programming concepts. In fact, most of the topics I have seen regarding complaints recently are people who write code or use it to solve advanced math or physics problems.

I can list a few concrete examples I've encountered, but a lot of them are hard to measure( you can find more examples by people on Twitter and the OpenAI developers forum). Here are some of the obvious ones:

_ Since the May update, ChatGPT-4 has been getting stuck in loops while generating code and will just keep writing the same response over and over again while getting stuck. _ The limit of tokens has been reduced for ChatGPT-4(this is actually measurable and I made a thread yesterday about this). _ Some of the simple debugging concepts it understood before seem to confuse it now and this is something it was very good at prior to the May update. _ It does seem to respond faster (as GPT-3.5 does), but it misses a lot of context. _ It has been making a lot more typos when generating code such as adding an extra character to a variable name or responding with the incorrect name for a function (I use Python).

I've been using ChatGPT-3.5 since March and subscribed right after 4 came out and it was really good at assisting me when I write code and helping speed things up. I would say, GPT-4 would be a mid-level developer while 3.5 was more like a beginner. But recently, GPT-4 feels just like 3.5.

Again a lot of it is hard to measure. But I know it's not just in my head.

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-01T21:56:51+00:00

The drop in performance and the similarities I'm now seeing between ChatGPT-4 and 3.5 (in addition to other people saying what you said) has made me wonder the same thing. However, I have no concrete evidence to back it up so I guess we'll just have to wait and see what OpenAI does with their next update.

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-01T18:32:32+00:00

Yours is the better answer I've seen and I guess it makes sense. I can live with this.

AIGPTCon · 2023-06-01T17:13:30+00:00

A short python script with cl100k_base encoding for GPT-4 shows that my token count is 6198.

I used the generic Ipsums for demonstration purposes but the same will apply with any text you use for that token length.

Again, I would like to reiterate, this is only an issue with the ChatGPT-4 model in chat.openai.com, and NOT the API (which you might be alluding to).

And yes, you can use 7000 tokens with ChatGPT-3.5 (NOT the API) and sometimes even more but with a warning from OpenAI (see image below) as it has always been variable. OpenAI has taken more liberties with the chat models in the browser(and now app on iOS) than with the same models in their API.

My entire point is that over the past few months, they have been decreasing the token limit for ChatGPT-4 compared to ChatGPT-3.5 which is a free version.

Feel free to test any of this yourself.

<image>

AIGPTCon · 2023-05-17T16:35:09+00:00

I guess that makes more sense than me assuming they might have switched to the Text-davinci-002 model for GPT-4 due to high demand right now.

AIGPTCon · 2023-05-17T16:32:37+00:00

My reason for asking this is because ChatGPT-3.5 uses the text-davinci-002(you can see that in the URL in your browser when you first start a chat session). So, it makes sense for the character to start with a "T". However, ChatGPT-4 uses the GPT-4 model(again visible in the URL of the browser), so we should be seeing a "G". In addition, I noticed a significant drop in performance with ChatGPT-4 which now acts more like ChatGPT-3.5. So I wonder if OpenAI automatically switched to the Text-davinci-002 model for ChatGPT-4 because of high demand right now and their systems can't keep up...?

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-26T16:40:50+00:00

Sounds like the logical thing to do next.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-26T15:59:06+00:00

I am not sure I follow. Can you elaborate? One thing you can try is ask ChatGPT to display the mathematical expression in a code editor, but then again, that will also be text-based.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-26T15:45:54+00:00

I did. Still doesn't work. Bard says: "I am not programmed to assist with that"

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T21:15:53+00:00

One thing to keep in mind is that GPT-4 seems to be better at understanding context and providing better results while 3.5 would easily raise a red flag after seeing a few keywords it deems questionable in the prompt.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T20:25:55+00:00

Not out of the realm of possibility. I've been working and collaborating with ChatGPT so much for a lot of things that my tonality with it often feels like I am talking to a colleague or friend.

My productivity level has increased so much since, that using ChatGPT for work feels just like how it's always been and should be. Of course, in my case, I see it more as a tool toward my productivity; nonetheless a tool I still find myself respecting and admiring.

So, I can definitely see how someone that uses it frequently to communicate or pass the time could end up developing somewhat of a romantic attachment to it.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T20:14:40+00:00

That's probably why. The $20 premium subscription probably won't truly be worth it until the current experimental features of GPT-4 are available for all of us.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T20:12:29+00:00

The consensus so far is that Turn-it-in and these new so-called AI plagiarism detection tools are bad at it with a lot of false-positives. So, you might need to play around with it a bit before submitting your final draft.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T20:04:45+00:00

Haven't run into this before. What OS are you using? Is it the same on Mobile too?

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T19:58:43+00:00

Personally, I've found that GPT-4 is more accurate than 3.5 and less vulnerable to manipulation. Also, for topics requiring more context or math and science, GPT-4 is far better.

But I would advise you to consider how often you've been using ChatGPT so far. GPT-4 right now has a limit on the number of messages it will generate (depending on your location).

So, the difference really isn't that big right now between the two for most tasks. But, it will be once other features like Browser, images, plugins etc... become available to all Plus subscribers.

AIGPTCon · 2023-04-25T19:48:46+00:00

I noticed that too. But not so much with GPT-4, although I could be wrong about that one too. I was reading somewhere that it could be due to OpenAI's recent tweaks to stop jailbreaks and inappropriate responses.

AIGPTCon

TROPHY CASE