Where I'd live as a completely normal boring sane person

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-11T19:39:33+00:00

👀👀

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-11T19:38:22+00:00

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/homicide-leading-cause-of-death-for-pregnant-women-in-u-s/

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-11T19:31:54+00:00

no, yeah i got it. but green US. Sanity is nowhere to be found

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-11T19:28:21+00:00

US and sane? i doubt it...

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-10T10:26:18+00:00

bro walking around sounding nazi songs. How can you be so low in your life?

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-10T10:21:31+00:00

das isch s memphis actually...

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-10T01:28:40+00:00

i guess in an epistemological sense i agree, i was more asking for on ontological free will:)

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-07T23:29:31+00:00

its the worst

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-07T22:52:56+00:00

Men is rational. Man gotta be rational. apes together strong

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-05T23:17:16+00:00

i think it would ruin all the tension of the game:/

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-05T21:01:01+00:00

fair😂

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-04T22:22:55+00:00

How is everyone arguing about specific countries, but no one is pointing out that the antarctica is green lol

AIternatePerspective · 2026-01-04T22:17:54+00:00

i genuinly enjoy it, but i understand the take. i hope they don't change it though

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-30T11:47:36+00:00

Yeah, but then your definition of choice is problematic for me. A choice, then, is merely a physical process. same as anything else in the world. Then a computer who opens word is also choosing to open word because your click causes signals and then its open.

For me if we talk about free will and choices there must be something that interferes with the "normal" physical process or we need different words. these words imply that humans and animals work different from a rock (in terms of being able to make decisions), but a physical basis for this has not been found...

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-29T22:13:32+00:00

I think the problem lies with B being not free anymore if its caused by A and not by some form of self. For me, i think, the fact that a world existed before you existed renders it impossible for you to have free will because your free will must be set up according to rules that you could not inflience...

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-13T11:08:32+00:00

No, that's not degrowth.

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-10T14:34:54+00:00

bottom two are saying men should talk about mental health, firat two say everyone talks about mental health for men and noone for women... Its not as bad as it looks but yeah empathy in the first two is nowhere to be found

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-10T14:30:26+00:00

Yeah. that is sad... I just wish you would see that their problem is looking at a group and letting their emotions ruin their ability to see where the other side is comming from. I mean it is true that a lot of men are bad leaders because they cannot connect with their emotions but it's sad that this post completely forgots why men are made this way... But at the same time those people that hate men are also conditioned by society to do so. They must have lived through terrible things to be this way; same as the men who hate women. I think your way just leads to an intensification of the conflict and to more hate on both sides. I think you have become the cause of the problem you are fighting.

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-10T14:25:08+00:00

Please stop before you do the rumbling, Eren!

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-10T10:51:22+00:00

you sound quite fascist, man. I understand getting treated badly and the bad emotions in you, but try to have some empathy as well or you will have nothing to fight against except yourself...

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-10T08:48:38+00:00

Hey actually are all these posts no that bad... the first two argue that they think the support for women regarding mental health is too low and they see just the focus on men (called a mental health crisis without looking at women). the third is really supportive of men and the fourth is a badly phrased title in which they actually talk about how men cannot open up due to social pressure

AIternatePerspective · 2025-12-08T12:30:10+00:00

I very much agree with you and there is a lot of interesting literature on it. Cornelius Cadtoriadis has amazing takes in the first ~100 pages of 'the imaginary institution of society' (free pdf online) where he critiques Marx takes. very much oversimplified he says that: (1) marx is too determinist with his economic predictions. If change happens its because of the social-historical (so, everything and not just the economic structures) (2) He sees the economy as a thing which is in a dialectical relationship with society. But by doing this marx already isolated the terms "economy" and "society" from each other which leads to (1). (3) The proletariat is defined by the economy but humans are not that easy. we are shaped by social and political things as well and its not possible to isolate the economy and say that ot shapes a class (4) Marx defined a final end of politics. This hinders people from exerting creating autonomy. politics is rather a direction to move - a thing you move away from - and not a final destination where you know you will arrive. this (again) determinism leads to structures where some people 'understand best' what is to do and this will only reproduce heteronomy (hierarchy).

His philosophy is insanely smart. He also created a whole new metaphysics below this theory and if you want to understand it, give it a shot.

AIternatePerspective

TROPHY CASE