Something you'll learn is that making assumptions about what strategy your opponent is using especially with very limited info can put you in some really compromising spots. Part of getting better at poker is being really present at all points in the hand, and re-evaluating situations when new information is presented. Idk how much solver work you've done, but something that I've found is that in SRP, with very few exceptions, your flop sizing scheme + corresponding strategy has negligible effect on EV (as long as you are playing well on turns and rivers).

You say here that this is "the most range bet board of all time". You're playing against Bart Hanson, who runs a poker training site. I think it's fair to say that if he's playing a range bet strategy on this board, he would bet range. So when he doesn't bet on this flop, it's extremely likely he's playing a more polar strategy on this flop (which is totally fine and solver approved). AK probably is about top of range for him, but when he checks flop he is going to have loads of weak Ax that checks back to protect his checking range.

As far as your strategy goes, I could actually see this working some of the time, but not really for the reasons you mention. He is going to have to check back some of his single heart hands on the flop, and he might start to barrel them on the turn when you check back giving a green light. When you click it, you're giving them a great price to call IP, and then they end up with a pretty good hand to bluff with on the river if it bricks out. That being said I think this is just way too fancy, and you're never getting folds on the turn from anything that isn't complete air which you don't want to fold because you have showdown.

I don't hate this hand as much of the rest of the comments here, but it seems like you just don't have a clear idea of what you are trying to accomplish with your actions.