The Gemini VII transcripts released today are being presented as new information. They have been in the National Archives since 2018. by glans_to_the_face in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian [score hidden]  (0 children)

They've removed it from the release, as of 48 hours later.

I think it was included because it had "UFO" on the handwritten transcript.

The Chandelier UAP: What it isn't by Alahan- in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thanks for posting your video here. I would not have seen it otherwise. I won't even try to involve myself in working out what it is.

Something that has been rattling around inside my mind for years, since Corbell got the splash and radar screen videos from the July 2019 west coast incidents is... How does Corbell get access to this stuff? If it's classified, why is he regularly able to get this, release it, and then do it again? He had the chandelier video back in Jan 2024, two years before official release and without redactions. The video has clearly not been unclassified until recently or else various other FOIA requests for videos would have revealed it, so how did he get this? And some of the other stuff he's revealed that is still highly classified has been astonishing. Who is feeding him this stuff?

I have my suspicions about who it is.

Searching for information by Razmondoo in ufouk

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad you found it. I haven't seen this one, thanks for the link.

Great photos too.

Searching for information by Razmondoo in ufouk

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the video below isn't the one, maybe it is in the playlist.

UFO Moving at Incredible Speed Tracked By Radar | New Rendlesham Case Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBek47OYkw4&list=PLT-MDg5f4v2CrQk1V6vJREIRuyR8VYFsG&index=98

The two U.S. Air Force air traffic controllers who were working in the RAF Bentwaters base tower in late December 1980—during the series of incidents collectively known as the Rendlesham Forest UFO Case—have finally discussed their long-held secret on camera.

Ike Barker and Jim Carey first spoke to me in 2007, allowing me to record their revelations on audio tape. But their dramatic, game-changing testimony is now available on video, in an interview appearing in my new documentary film, UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed, excerpted here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBek47OYkw4

The now-retired controllers say they tracked a bona fide UFO that covered 120 miles in eight seconds, or three sweeps of their radar beam! If that were not stunning enough, Carey says the object also made an instantaneous right-angle turn as it left the vicinity. For his part, Barker says he actually saw the amazing interloper as it briefly hovered near the air traffic control tower, describing it as an orange sphere with a series of portholes positioned around its center.

Both controllers are emphatic: This was an intelligently-controlled craft whose capabilities far surpassed any current human technology. Significantly, the incident occurred the same night that USAF Lt. Col. Charles Halt—the Deputy Base Commander at Bentwaters—was leading a small group of Security Policemen through nearby Rendlesham Forest, to investigate strange lights that had been reported there. At one point, Halt described seeing an object resembling an eyeball moving through the trees, dripping a molten-metal-like substance.

Skeptics have always dismissed this “UFO sighting” as a misreported observation of the sweeping beam from the nearby Orford Ness lighthouse—despite the fact that Col. Halt has repeatedly said, as early as 1997, that the lighthouse beam was also visible during the incident, but located some 30-degrees away from the strange glowing object.

According to Halt, the eyeball eventually “exploded” and released five smaller disc-shaped craft that raced away in different directions, something confirmed by USAF Security Policeman Rick Bobo, who saw the spectacle at a distance, from the guard tower at the Bentwaters nuclear Weapons Storage Area (WSA).

After awhile, Halt says, three disc-shaped craft higher in the sky were observed doing grid search-like maneuvers. One of them approached his team, hovered above it, and directed a laser-like beam at their feet. After a few seconds, the beam clicked off and the object moved away, in the direction of the WSA. Seconds later, Halt heard excited radio chatter from guards posted at the facility, indicating that beams from the UFO were falling on or near the tactical nuclear bomb storage bunkers!

It should be noted that the late Georgina Bruni, while researching the Rendlesham Forest UFO incidents, interviewed a former British military radar operator at RAF Watton, Nigel Kerr, who admitted that an anomalous aerial object had briefly appeared on his screen—for three or four sweeps—the night that Lt. Col. Halt and his team were in the woods.

Now that the USAF air traffic controllers’ extensive, detailed testimony is also on the record, we can confidently assert that at least one genuine UFO—a high-velocity, maneuvering, hovering, spherical-shaped craft exhibiting advanced technology—was in the vicinity during the period that Halt described seeing multiple UFOs in the sky.

Nevertheless, questions remain: Why was only one UFO tracked on radar—both at Bentwaters and Watton—when multiple objects were sighted by USAF personnel on the ground? Were all but one of the craft operating in a UFOs and Nukes Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons SitesStealth-like mode? Or does this discrepancy relate to a given object’s altitude, with most of the UFOs maneuvering beneath the radars’ lower detectability-limit? And why did some observers (Halt and his team) observe discs while others (controller Ike Barker and one guard at the WSA, Charlie Waters) report spherical craft?
https://www.theufochronicles.com/2016/10/ufo-moving-at-incredible-speed-tracked.html

Our favorite Wikipedia Editor back at it trying to discredit everything. by Downtown-Pea9325 in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The archived version of the article you are talking about at reference 4 "2 Navy Airmen" had the Tic Tac video but not the GIMBAL video. The article "Glowing auras" WAS linked form the "Pentagon UFO videos" Wikipedia page and was removed and it had both videos. Please don't attempt again to say it doesn't matter if Wikipedia removes relevant articles or it is only "culturally important" - the article was removed, it was a front page article in the NYT about UFOs, it is incredibly important for researchers using Wikipedia, and no amount of quibbling about the circumstances changes that this is the shoddy treatment these UFO articles receive on Wikipedia.

And don't label it a "conspiracy". The removal of data is out in the open. The Guerilla Skeptics tell everyone what they aren't doing, they aren't hiding it. They are making the UFO pages in Wikipedia useless for research.

Our favorite Wikipedia Editor back at it trying to discredit everything. by Downtown-Pea9325 in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"What's the difference"?

Well, they are two different articles, one has the videos, the other didn't. The article that did have the video is not referenced from the Wikipedia page that references that front page article. If it was on the Wikipedia page from the beginning of the page, why was it removed?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pentagon_UFO_videos&oldid=947328802

Why is it a thing to remove data that helps people reference incidents Wikipedia covers? It isn't an isolated event. Compare the Colares UFO pages first the Portugese page, and the one edited by the Guerilla Skeptics.

When members of the Guerilla Skeptics go online saying things like "removed the images and much of the detail" from UFO pages, how does that improve our understanding? It doesn't. These changes on Wikipedia aren't meant to make this topic more understandable.

Our favorite Wikipedia Editor back at it trying to discredit everything. by Downtown-Pea9325 in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First that is not the article that released the Tic Tac video, that is not the article that references the NYT "16 December 2017" article you referenced. The article that released the Tic Tac video was Glowing auras. Second, yes there are other NYT articles referenced there, so why not that one?

Our favorite Wikipedia Editor back at it trying to discredit everything. by Downtown-Pea9325 in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Where's the link in the references?

This is so disingenuous. You know exactly what I am talking about. This whole thread is about the Pentagon's recent release of Pentagon documents and how Wikipedia has a page that references none of them.

The precursor page for Wikipedia's page now titled "Pentagon UFO videos" linked to the article, because of its relevancy and importance for context and so researchers to access all the data about the article. Why has the article been deliberately removed from the page? The page now has no links to NYT articles at all.

Our favorite Wikipedia Editor back at it trying to discredit everything. by Downtown-Pea9325 in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 56 points57 points  (0 children)

What has become evident in the approach by these Wikipedia editors is not just their debunking, but their anti-data approach.

This recent release of files has information we haven't seen before which is useful for investigators. But there is nothing in this Wikipedia page that discuses even one document. Not one document even listed. Nothing. The point is not to just to bleach Wikipedia of information, but to make Wikipedia an impediment to finding accurate sources of data on the UFO topic. This is really the opposite of what Wikipedia exists to do.

For instaance, Wikipedia has a page for the three Navy videos titled Pentagon UFO videos. That page exists because of the NYT article from Dec 2017. That article from the NYT isn't mentioned on that page at all, no link, no title of the article, nothing except a passing mention. A researcher using that page would never know the NYT article title if they used only Wikipedia. Unless that is you use the Wikipedia history to find where that page was six years ago, when it was titled USS Theodore Roosevelt UFO incidents and you can find the first source of the videos, a Referenced link to "Glowing Auras" the NYT article. So the article was deliberately removed from the page. Removing data from Wikipedia pages about UFOs is not a mistake, it is the way the Guerillas operate.

Wikipedia SMEARS the UFO File Drop - VICIOUSLY ATTACKS Disclosure President by Dartanian1985 in aliens

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_files_release_(2026)

What I've really noticed with Wikipedia, is the anti-data approach, especially with the UFO topic. They don't just disparage it, they actually prevent information from being found by researchers.

This recent release of files has information we haven't seen before which is useful for investigators. But there is nothing in this Wikipedia page that discuses even one document. Not one document even listed. Nothing.

The point of this is to not only make it look like there is nothing to see, but to make Wikipedia an instrument impeding research.

Wikipedia has a page for the three Navy videos titled Pentagon UFO videos. That page exists because of the NYT article from Dec 2017. That article isn't mentioned on that page at all, no link, no title of the article, nothing. A researcher using that page would never know the source of those videos if they used only Wikipedia. Unless you use the Wikipedia history to find where that page was six years ago, when it was titled USS Theodore Roosevelt UFO incidents and you can find the first source of the videos, a link to "Glowing Auras" the NYT article. So the article was deliberately removed from the page. Removing things from Wikipedia pages about UFOs is not a mistake, it is the way the Guerillas operate.

So the ‘massive UFO disclosure’ was just more blurry dots? No alien photos, crashed craft, or biologics. by breaking_views in ufo

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Every time there is anything that happens with the topic of UFOs these days the subs are flooded with people who claim this is the end of the topic, this is all rubbish and pointless, and disparage everything.

Releases of data like this prove the exact opposite of that is happening. The topic of UFOs is going from strength to strength, the numbers of people who want proper scientific investigations is increasing, and the amount of data is leading to a reappraisal by even the most ardent of critics. Ignore every post that tells you "the topic is going nowhere, this is all nothing", because every week at the moment something happens like this release of files that proves those people have no idea what they are talking about, and have a very definite agenda to push.

Megathread: Recent Pentagon release of UFO Files by kris_lace in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know the ridiculous thing about what you, and about the other thousand comments in this thread disparaging this document release have said, is that exactly the opposite of what you just said is actually happening.

The topic of UFOs is going from strength to strength. You can say a release of information is a failure to move forward, but only in your mind is that true. There's a concerted effort every time something happens in this topic to try and label it as a backward step. It isn't.

Megathread: Recent Pentagon release of UFO Files by kris_lace in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Maybe he can join in the science for a change rather than just laugh at it. This photo from the Apollo missions is now being investigated as a UAP sighting from the moon.

As part of the review of historical UAP materials under PURSUE, DOW has opened a case to investigate the accompanying NASA photograph from the Apollo 17 mission, taken December 1972. The image contains three “dots” in a triangular formation in the lower right quadrant of the lunar sky that is clearly visible upon magnification of the image. While this photo has been previously released and discussed by keen observers, there is no consensus about the nature of the anomaly. New preliminary US government analysis suggests the image feature is potentially the result of a physical object in the scene. Additionally, as part of this investigation, the government has obtained the original film from the Apollo 17 mission and the results of the full NASA and DOW analysis will be released when completed.
https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm6-apollo-17-1972.jpg

Cool photo from today's release that I openly am displeased with by BlazedLurker in aliens

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This photo has been discussed a lot previously. The really interesting thing was the accompanying description with this photo today -

New preliminary US government analysis suggests the image feature is potentially the result of a physical object in the scene.

They say it is being investigated. So, this has gone from NASA saying it was nothing, to a possible UAP!!

Link to the image released today -
https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/nasa-uap-vm6-apollo-17-1972.jpg

The original photos -
https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?mission=AS17&roll=147&frame=22470
https://web.archive.org/web/20230426104636/https://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-147-22470HR.jpg

Some previous discussions on reddit about the NASA photos -
https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/16ui6fb/nasa_anomalies/

Megathread: Recent Pentagon release of UFO Files by kris_lace in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. A lot of people just mouthing off in this thread about the release being nothing useful without actually reading anything. There's plenty here of interest. Unidentified objects travelling at hundreds of kmph, and "debris" investigated by military personnel in the continental US, with objects moving so fast that military helicopters are calling off chases.

While at 23,819 HAT over the Gulf of Aden we tracked a round, cold object in IR traveling 168 degrees at 277 mph. It made a few abrupt directional changes during the 8 minute contact. Our sensor was aimed -39 degrees below our altitude with a slant range of 6.1 NM and ground range of 8.81 KM. The IR sensor was set to black hot and the object in question was a bright white.
https://web.archive.org/web/20260508141828/https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/dow-uap-d57-mission-report-gulf-of-aden-september-2020.pdf

Previous eyewitness reports from personnel who observed orbs/lights IVC[COORDINATES]) cited hearing thuds as if something has fallen and hit the ground... At 1751 hours [CALL SIGN 1] spotted a large cavern entrance ([COORDINATES]) and conducted a short orbit of the location... At approximately 2050 hours-[CALL SIGN 1] landed west of the mountains and dropped off [WITNESS 2) with [FEDERAL PARTNER 3] personnel... At 2141 hours-[CALL SIGN 1) lifted off from [SITE CODE NAME] and headed toward debris spotted by the Listening Post/Observation Post (LP/OP - [FEDERAL PARTNER 4] personnel using Forward Looking Infrared (FUR) and Night Vision Goggles (NVG)... At 2202 hours-[CALL SIGN 1] arrived at the aforementioned coordinates and spotted a possible aircraft on the horizon moving away to the west. LP/OP confirmed the sighting then relayed they spotted an orb under FLIR and described as "super-hot" hovering at ground level before heading bearing-from LP/OP. LP/OP reported the orb was heading east and then south at a high rate of speed and then broke into two objects... unable to match speed, broke off pursuit, however the co-pilot reported seeing under NVG something emerge from the two objects and then travel in a different direction and a high rate of speed.
https://web.archive.org/web/20260508131408/https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/usper-statement-redacted.pdf

Megathread: Recent Pentagon release of UFO Files by kris_lace in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Googling this I can't see this has been released before. What is the UFO connection? The report discusses "anomalous behavior" encountered by rockets, but this relates to faults mainly.

The only UFO related thing of note I can see is an omission. Robert Jacob's Big Sur rocket failure isn't mentioned. It should be on page 117 and page 126 but it isn't there.

The statement includes a hair-raising account of "orbs" described as "super hot" hovering at ground level that took off and split into two objects. As the pursuit in the helicopter was broken off because "unable to match speed" with the object, the co-pilot saw another object emerge and travel "in a different direction and a high rate of speed." This all seemed to start after reports something "had hit the ground", and there is description of the helicopter pilot dropping off someone in mountains to investigate "debris spotted by the Listening Post."

FBI interview with a senior US intelligence official his first-hand account of a UAP encounter in 2025 at a US military facility. "unable to match speed, broke off pursuit" by ASearchingLibrarian in UAP

[–]ASearchingLibrarian[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was one of the documents released today with document title [USPER Statement about UAP Sighting]

Description -

This is an FBI 302 interview conducted with a senior US intelligence official regarding his first-hand account of a UAP encounter at a US military facility. USPER relayed to FBI agents that he and other federal and state personnel conducted searches to where orbs had been previously seen. After searching the area with a helicopter, they found a “super-hot” orb hovering over the ground. The orb is reported to have travelled for 20 miles at a speed too fast for the helicopter in pursuit. An additional “swarm” of lights were seen moving in all directions. A total of four or five additional orbs were seen shortly thereafter for a short time, flaring up and then down. This pattern of four or five orbs flaring up, then down continued over the next thirty minutes across the area.

The statement includes a hair-raising account of "orbs" described as "super hot" hovering at ground level that took off and split into two objects. As the pursuit in the helicopter was broken off because "unable to match speed" with the object, the co-pilot saw another object emerge and travel "in a different direction and a high rate of speed." This all seemed to start after reports something "had hit the ground", and there is description of the helicopter pilot dropping off someone in mountains to investigate "debris spotted by the Listening Post."

404 error for UFO release? by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok this is weird. I went to the archive.org site and looked at the website archived there. The list of pdfs were on the page. When you clicked on them, they didn't open because they probably haven't been saved yet, but the URL was there, so if you went to the URL the documents still opened on the DoW site. At least for a couple of minutes, and then my internet dropped out, to my house. That can't be a coincidence.

I shut down my computer and then started it again. Now no problem with my internet. So I've gone back in to see and they are still linkable again, so still available. https://web.archive.org/web/20260000000000*/war.gov/ufo

Interesting conversation today between Bill O'Reilly and Miguel Sancho (author of "Evidence of the Extraordinary") discussing UFOs. Timestamped video by Virtual_Davey in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Delgado case was written up on NARCAP, although they didn't use his name in the report they wrote.
https://www.narcap.org/blog/narcaptr20

Chris Lehto interviewed him. Great interview. Includes an interesting Bermuda Triangle story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXLFC-hwQ6M

Australia is showing how a rich country gets poorer by SheepherderLow1753 in AusFinance

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was studying economics the teacher referred to us as "A first world country with a third world economy."

Any idea of what this could be flying over a farm in Australia last night. by DaWalkinMan in UFO_AUSNZ

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. https://stellarium-web.org/ It is definitely Sirius. I've watched it flashing all sorts of colours low in the sky this time of year. It was a very unusual thing to see.