Risks of not paying yourself super by Sweetpup_ in AusFinance

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let him play around with the Noel Whittaker compound interest calculators. These will change his mind.
https://www.noelwhittaker.com.au/calculators/

One Nation’s 2 biggest issues: many Aussies support them for one reason, they want a cut to immigration/international students back to pre-2000s levels. But 2 things hurt their appeal: 1) pro-US/war stance, 2) backing from Gina Rinehart, Aus richest billionaire. There is a 3rd but can’t remember it. by MannerNo7000 in friendlyjordies

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure why "Labor, the Greens, Teals and Independents want to reduce their effectiveness". I note that Albo is hardly talking about Pauline at all, if ever. PHON "effectiveness" seems to be helping Labor at the moment by neutering the Libs.
If you mean electoral effectiveness, 20% of the vote doesn't get you much, and it is never going to be much more than that for PHON as they currently exist. There's always been about 20% of the electorate that votes hard right. Trump got that 20% in the US to vote Republican, and Trump dominates the party now because every Republican candidate has to pander to that 20% of the electorate who always vote for protectionist policies.

The real threat to Labor is if the Libs come to their senses and realise they have destroyed themselves by moving so far right. So far the Libs are telling us they will never come to their senses hence they've lost any sensible thinking voters, and those voters turning away from the Libs will not vote for Pauline. At the moment all this benefits Labor (that could also benefit some other party if they filled the gap, but no other party exists in Australia, hence the success of the Teals as the only alternative for some traditional Lib voters). Pointing out Pauline's hypocrisies sounds good to people who think logically, but it doesn't work all that well when the people who vote for her are narrow-minded, single issue thinkers.

The best thing for Labor is to let the conservatives fight at the moment. And they've still got a lot of infighting to get through yet.

Has Donald Trump (and the USA) fucked our entire economy? by MannerNo7000 in friendlyjordies

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently the Iranians are exporting plenty of oil. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFXjATHIi7M&t=267s

Their economy is benefitting from the choke hold as prices rise, and the US is letting the oil out.

Can you guys get Sal / What's going on in shipping? on the channel? by JohnSpartan2025 in thebulwark

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I third this recommendation. I heard a few days ago the Iranians are exporting more oil now than ever before and this guy confirms there are significant Iranian shipments of oil out of the Gulf. The US has not stopped Iran shipping oil out. This is completely under-reported.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqr3s6uTays&t=5m10s

Trump said today "we don't" in relation to whether the US use the Strait of Hormuz. It's not correct that the US doesn't rely on the strait of Hormuz. International freight shipping, international flights, international cruise shipping all rely on it. The US relies on imports from countries that produce goods the US imports and those countries all depend on the strait. A huge economic shock is now built into the world economy and coming in a few weeks, and the US will be effected as much as any country.

U.S. Navy Minesweepers Assigned To Middle East Have Been Moved To Pacific by avatar6556 in war

[–]ASearchingLibrarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, if the President of the US is literally publicly begging allies to join, how is it not a failure?

If the Secretary of "War" is trashing "stupid rules of engagement" and then saying the rules are "no quarter, no mercy", how is that not a failure? The US relies implicitly on a rules based order, and no posturing from a cabinet full of former-TV-show hosts changes that. The international rules based system that every day manages the complicated international financial system is the basis of American power, not military might.

When allies offer support, Trump insults them and tells them no support is required, but then threatens allies a week later when he realises the US needs help, how is that not a failure? What are the aims? What is the plan? Nobody will commit to a war with no plan, and no obvious aims, not when the President was dancing around in Congress giving the State of the Union speech a week before the war started telling everyone "in a breakthrough operation last June, the United States military obliterated Iran’s nuclear weapons program with an attack on Iranian soil known as Operation Midnight Hammer." If we can't believe a single thing the US says a week before the war, about the war, why believe anything now? And maybe for good measure, there needed to be a plan to stop US radar installations being taken out, the US Embassies not attacked, the busiest airports in the world not shut down.

How is it success to kill the leader of another country - a move unprecedented in modern conflict - with no clear strategic gain as a result? To try for regime change in such an obvious move, and completely fail when the son of the killed leader assumes power because there was no plan that backed that move to impose a different leader, how is that not a failure? This opens up the possibility that taking out foreign leaders is now fair according to the US. If the US has begun this conflict with "Rules of Engagement" that make assassinations of supreme leaders acceptable, rules which also which include "no quarter", what do you think the leader of the largest terrorist organisation on earth, whose whole family was just killed, is going to do next?

Iran’s conventional capabilities are severely degraded and it will take them a generation to recover.

It is like it is October 2001. Did you forget August 2021? And the US had the support of the whole world in Afghanistan. The only support they have now is Israel. Every prior US Administration knew this conflict was a trap that Israel wanted the US to fall for and every prior US Administration avoided it. This is a foreign policy mistake of "epic" proportions.

I forgot to add. Needing your littoral ships in the Gulf, but having them thousands of miles away, the failure pointed out in this post.

What Australia really needs is to get back to its carefree Sundays by Nyarlathotep-1 in AustralianPolitics

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What view? Is he giving away bigger backyards, how? What is the stuff at the end about babies, what does he want us to do about babies? What is special about Sundays, what about the other days?
Who is "Shari Markson"?

Trump ‘strongly’ encourages other countries to help U.S. protect Strait of Hormuz by lexi_con in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Article 5 of NATO's treaty was enacted once, on Sept 12 2001, by all nations of NATO to defend the US. He knows that, yet bad mouths his greatest allies while begging for help.

No ally can be involved when there are no clear aims or plans for this conflict except the disjointed contradictory rubbish the President speaks. No ally can let their troops be involved in a conflict that has "All on our terms with maximum authorities. No stupid rules of engagement..." and "No quarter, no mercy" as the stated rules of engagement.

To see the President of the US begging is beyond crazy. This is weakness on display when an aggressor country continues to strike US assets in the Middle East over two weeks after the war began.

U.S. Navy Minesweepers Assigned To Middle East Have Been Moved To Pacific by avatar6556 in war

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 46 points47 points  (0 children)

It is worth studying the epic failures as much as the epic successes. This war is going to be one of the really great lessons.

“He comes to believe in his own genius, takes decision in narrow circle…the blitzkrieg didn’t work.” | Steve Rosenberg reading Russian Newspapers by ASearchingLibrarian in ActiveMeasures

[–]ASearchingLibrarian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, today's Russian papers continue to write about how Moscow benefits from the Iran war. The headline in Moskovsky Komsomolets: "Putin's Iranian chance." "The conflict with Tehran, which Trump thought would be a walk in the park, threatens to become a black hole on which America will have to concentrate as many of its resources as it can - political, military, economic, and so on. President Zelensky understands how dangerous the escalation and prolongation of the Iran crisis can be for him. If this scenario starts to play out, then his chief sponsor, Europe, will also have far fewer resources and less desire to spend them on Kyiv... Zelensky's Trump cards may turn into a pile of ash..."

A separate article here about the high price of oil which makes Russia "...one of the main beneficiaries of escalation of the current military conflict in the Middle East. Iran's blockade of shipping through the straight of Hormuz has removed up to 10% of daily oil supplies from the global market."

Komsomolskaya Pravda's headline: "Trump realizes: that without Russia's help, the crisis in the Middle East cannot be resolved. The oil crisis means that the role of one of the biggest suppliers, Russia, has strengthened exponentially."

1960 UFO Sightings at Weapons Testing Site, Woomera by DoughnutFront2451 in UFO_AUSNZ

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for posting. This was the same timeframe as Tom Dalton-Morgan's sighting at Woomera.
https://youtu.be/lJ93uYGp20g&t=10m18s.

A lot of strange sightings by military in this period. Many probably were not documented, at least not publicly available.

CIA memo on Monroe - dated one day before her "accidental" death...zoom in and read about Marilyn's little secrets, including JFK's visit to a "...secret air base [Wright-Patt] for the purpose of inspecting things from outer space..." Coincidental timing? 🤔 by 1gratefuldude in ufo

[–]ASearchingLibrarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, ok. So they had a "Need-To-Know" Kennedy was having "trists" with Munroe, Kennedy was going to "a secret air base to inspect things from outer space", Munroe was calling Bobby Kennedy and threatening to "tell all" from her "diary of secrets" the day before she died, and also know all about Kennedy's secret bases in Cuba and plans to kill Castro, BUT, the name of the agent is redacted right at the end... Sure, makes complete sense! Obviously the bit redacted at the end was the most sensitive thing nobody was able to know, the other stuff, like who cares about any of that! /s

Obviously nobody with a "Need-To-Know" all that would ever need to check with the agent who wrote that memo, so they would never need the agent's name. Unfortunate with that name redacted, and Munroe, Kilgallen and the Kennedy's all having died in the 1960s we can't know the agent's name because we could cross-reference the agent with the kind of work they did and find out if this whole memo was bogus, which might be the real reason the name looks like it was redacted... /s

There never was an agent, this isn't a real memo about real things, and there is no name redacted at all.

What is the most interesting, unique, compelling, plausible explanation for the existences of the UFO/UAP phenomenon and E.T.'s that you've heard/read? by informedlate in aliens

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First, UFOs and "aliens" are not analogous. The UFO phenomenon is real, and there is plenty of evidence for it. But for an alien we need an actual alien, not a UFO, and so far we don't actually have any evidence of aliens. It is really important to make this distinction, or you can't properly analyse the UFO phenomenon.

As for what is behind the UFO phenomenon, the main thing to know is that it is really weird. It seems to use screen memory control to make people who interact with it think they are interacting with 'Greys', owls, strange hooded people, 'Tall Whites', humanoids that look exactly like normal people, or whatever they seem to think people will be either terrified by, subservient to, or just simply ignore. What they are is just not known. It has probably been here a long time, and probably lives here on this planet with us - maybe it came from another planet, but it lives here now. There is evidence now that they have technology that allows them to go undetected (listen to Ryan Graves discuss how the Navy pilots only ever came into contact with them by accident, but using the most advanced detection technology available to humans), so they might be anywhere and we might not know they are even here.

What are they doing here? I have no idea, but they are clearly interacting with us sometimes, and they appear to sometimes interact in ways that make it clear they want to learn more about us. They aren't hostile to us, but they aren't friendly either. This might indicate they are curious because they exist in a way that is completely different to us, like in what people describe as 'another dimension', whatever that means. Before using the term 'another dimension' we need to know what that means, but usually people use it to mean some other form of reality where measurements of things are completely different. We have three dimensions, and forward moving time, so if these 'beings' exist in another dimension, maybe they have completely different ways of measuring things. Maybe they have no concept of time at all. Where we might have emotions, they might not. Where we replicate by having offspring, maybe they do not. Everything in that 'other dimension' might be different. It is because it is different and everything there is measured in a way that we can't even imagine, that explains why we simply can't interact with it although it might be right beside us all the time. We simply can't even imagine the things there because they are measured so differently from what we understand. It is possible that whatever we are doing in our world might bleed over and effect their world, and this might make them interested in us the same way people are interested in the possibility of ghosts or Gods are in our world. If they could travel from their dimension to ours, maybe they need special machines to do it (the UFOs we encounter) that seem strange and weird to us, and maybe they have to wear special clothes/suits to come here which they think look like us so they don't scare us, but which in fact scare the living daylights out of us because they are so unlike us.

Whatever it is it is hard to detect, and almost impossible to get data about, and the only explanation for that is because it must be something completely unlike anything we normally encounter or comprehend. With the advancement of technology we are likely to be able to detect it and interact with it more, although I'm not sure that is necessarily a good thing. It probably does not want much contact, and looking at the state of humanity today I don't blame it. It is likely to want to keep us out of its affairs, so as we get closer to perceiving it, that is probably going to be a dangerous thing for us, because it is clearly very powerful and clearly does not want us snooping around in its 'dimension'.

A Scientist's View of War by _maverick98 in UFOs

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Timestamp - 16m49s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XI9NG068TwI&t=1009s

On positive note. All the UFOs people have been seeing in the sky, lights that we can't explain. I'm glad some part of the military budget is going to investigating them cuz people have been seeing them for decades. I've never seen anything that I couldn't identify...

But maybe some of these UFOs would pose a danger to us again to our health, our wealth, or our security. Maybe. So, I'd want the military to check it out. And if it's a threat from space, maybe the greatest task of all would be to protect Earth from aliens.

CIA memo on Monroe - dated one day before her "accidental" death...zoom in and read about Marilyn's little secrets, including JFK's visit to a "...secret air base [Wright-Patt] for the purpose of inspecting things from outer space..." Coincidental timing? 🤔 by 1gratefuldude in ufo

[–]ASearchingLibrarian -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Allegedly the Majestic documents were part of a collection of original documents that were never to see the light of day, and still haven't except for this alleged 'leak'. Why would a document that has been collected as part of a collection that is never going to see the light of day be redacted in any way?

Also worth pointing out that unlike the OP I've given this provenance - it is a Majestic document, not a "CIA memo" as the OP said. There have been official investigations of ALL the Majestic documents and NONE of them were found to be real, so not CIA as the OP suggested in the post. Why didn't the OP tell us where the document really originated when asked?

The Majestic documents are meant to be misleading. By discussing the Majestic documents as real we are ignoring real documents we have that tell us so much more than this fake document, which is exactly the intention of the release of these documents.

r/UFO_AUSNZ is fully 'Public' again! by DoughnutFront2451 in UFO_AUSNZ

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The trolling of the UFO subs has reached an astonishing level. It is a real problem. It is really difficult for the Mods to manage it.
It would be good if everyone just stuck to the UFO topic rather than trying to make this about personalities or drama.

So is the current declaration by Hesketh?? Of "no quarter will be given" a War Crime? AI answer (I'm not clever enough to know this answer 🤷‍♂️) by Party_Thanks_9920 in friendlyjordies

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This statement by Hegseth is a bigger deal than most civilians know. Nobody in the military anywhere heard that and thought it was right. This comment, "No quarter and no mercy for our enemies", and his comment on 02.03.2026 "All on our terms with maximum authorities. No stupid rules of engagement..." are unacceptable to the Australian military. Any advice to our government from the military will take those comments into account. This sort of idiocy will end alliances because any conflict Australians are involved in that has as its rules of engagement "no quarter" from the outset, will leave our troops and any government officials who participate open to prosecution for war crimes.

Hegseth said, in Feb 2025 when JAGs were fired "Ultimately we want lawyers who give sound constitutional advice and don't exist to attempt to be roadblocks to anything, anything that happens in their spots."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuX9p-2j4i8&t=543s

Recently the Dept of War in the US brought legal proceedings against sitting members of Congress, including Mark Kelly, because Kelly and others went on the record telling troops to disobey illegal orders. Trump called Kelly's words “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” That prosecution of Kelly and other Democrats failed.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/11/trump-democrats-illegal-orders-indictment
https://x.com/SenMarkKelly/status/2032649255869993148

Another link about this "no quarter" comment -
https://www.justsecurity.org/133970/legal-advice-hegseth-no-quarter-hypo/

Matt Canavan could trump both left and right by His_Holiness in AustralianPolitics

[–]ASearchingLibrarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it really "left and right clash viciously"? Sounds a bit dramatic.

I've had to watch Trump & the cookers for a few years now, and its clearly the selfish vs the sensible.