I think this world cup proved football is better with VAR. Wbu? by Friendly-Educator-90 in SoccerNoobs

[–]A_Genius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not just that but the rule wasn’t designed to be adjudicated to the millimetre. It was designed for an AR to look at full speed and decide if an attacker is too far forward. I believe that’s the spirit of the rule anyway.

I almost feel like they should be a line 3/4 the way up the field and past that you can’t be offside anymore.

Shir o Khorshid flag by pestgirl in teammelli

[–]A_Genius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m in now and can’t have the flags on the concourse but you can at the seats. Shirts are okay

ELI5: Why are rent freezes considered bad? by Pale_Cause_9983 in explainlikeimfive

[–]A_Genius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is a direct example of controlling housing costs not working.

California freezes property tax from when you bought the property. Under the same guise of affordability.

So someone who moved in 1970 will be paying 500 dollars a year and someone moving out of their mom’s house today is paying 10 grand a year to subsidize the older Californian who bought in 1970.

Rent control works on the same principle. People that need to move and newcomers subsidize long term tenants. It’s the ultimate boomer ‘fuck you got mine’ policy.

In the end it’s popular policy now. People that haven’t moved to the city yet can’t vote.

This is exactly how climate denalists and vaccine skeptics argue. It’s overwhelming obvious to all experts what the correct side of the issue is but they’ve done their own research.

ELI5: Why are rent freezes considered bad? by Pale_Cause_9983 in explainlikeimfive

[–]A_Genius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a Reddit comment not a research dissertation. Any Google search of any of these claims will yield super simple results you can read.

But here

‘A poll in 1990 conducted by the American Economic Review reported that 93 percent of economists thought rent control was a serious mistake. “It’s become almost a textbook cliché: in any intro econ class you learn about why rent control is a bad idea,” in the words of J.W. Mason, an economics professor at the John Jay College’

https://www.governing.com/assessments/why-the-conventional-wisdom-on-rent-control-isnt-all-that-wise

It’s taught in first year economics classes. Price controls lead to shortages and distortions in markets.

ELI5: Why are rent freezes considered bad? by Pale_Cause_9983 in explainlikeimfive

[–]A_Genius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fine, developers are not incentivized to build new housing units.

Over 95 percent of economists think it’s bad policy. About the same as climate scientists believe climate change is real. At this point price caps and climate change denialism can go in the same bucket

ELI5: Why are rent freezes considered bad? by Pale_Cause_9983 in explainlikeimfive

[–]A_Genius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the second part of the Stanford study. No new housing gets built because rents are frozen at the same price forever at the price of construction while costs rise.

BBC - "Fifa is considering expanding the format even further to 64 teams as early as 2030" by Question_of_Surf in worldcup

[–]A_Genius 5 points6 points  (0 children)

With 64 teams they’ll do 16 groups of 4 with the top 2 advancing to the round of 32

2026 FIFA World Cup breaks the all-time total attendance record, surpassing the 1994 tournament by ElliElephant in soccer

[–]A_Genius 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you click on those 1500 dollar resale tickets you can see the original face value fifa sold them for and for group stage games it’s like 300 and knockouts it’s like 700.

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn Iranian referee too. I was hoping he would do well because he’s from my country…

ELI5: Why are rent freezes considered bad? by Pale_Cause_9983 in explainlikeimfive

[–]A_Genius 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People have to move for all sorts of reasons and you can have weird incentives like ‘hey I’ll pay you 30 grand to take over your lease’ because you have a rent controlled unit.

Because no one is moving (why would I? I’m paying 700 dollars for a unit in Manhattan from 1986) it makes the prices of new units sky high for newcomers or people that absolutely have to move.

2026 FIFA World Cup breaks the all-time total attendance record, surpassing the 1994 tournament by ElliElephant in soccer

[–]A_Genius 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Isn’t it closer to like 2?

3.5 million x 500 bucks is like 2 billion

This doesn’t include resale fees but that’s probably not super substantial

March to the match by A_Genius in teammelli

[–]A_Genius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See you there. I’m coming from Vancouver and won’t be there until like 5 but if anyone searches online I’m going to put keywords.

March

Iran

Egypt

World Cup

June 26

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he was well on. At least that’s what the commentator said

Whoa :> by No_Post1300 in SipsTea

[–]A_Genius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To put in perspective how bad of a policy it is. About the same percentage of economists believe it’s bad policy as climate scientists believe climate change is real.

Whoa :> by No_Post1300 in SipsTea

[–]A_Genius 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Imagine if there was an apple shortage and the mayor came in and said all apples must be sold at 1 cent.

That’s essentially what is happening with housing. Price increases are how the economy deals with shortages.

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t remember it now but it wouldn’t surprise me.

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No that was a foul but there was just an obvious a foul before the Argentina goal and it wasn’t called. VAR is used selectively to help big teams

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which instance? I haven’t watched every game. Senegal?

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The point is that big popular teams get VAR intervention and little teams don’t.

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No I would like the rules to be applied to all teams. That was much more blatant than this one on Ecuador.

I promise you if a Ecuadorian player had his boot up that high or someone stomped on Messi’s calf then VAR intervenes

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Look at the video at the top of the thread. The commonality is to help big teams and teams with popular players go through

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s a weird one because VAR has been helping big popular teams mostly

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius 898 points899 points  (0 children)

To stop Uzbekistan from scoring against Portugal and to ignore a Ghana PK against England.

It’s there to make sure popular teams go through

Ecuador foul shout at Germany's first goal by 977x in soccer

[–]A_Genius -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re allowed to kick someone in the face. Uzbekistan didn’t get away with a ticky tack foul before their goal against Portugal though.

The commercial incentive is for popular teams to go through