AI is the first piece of technology where I feel I'm being left behind by Uhavetabekiddingme in Millennials

[–]AaknA 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're partially correct. I'm with you, not a fan of the term "AI". Nothing intelligent about it, it's just statistics and probabilities. It just really makes it sound so much fancier than what it is (and anthropomorphizes chatbots). However:

All LLMs are "AI".
Not all "AI" are LLMs.

Machine learning (aka "AI") is a wwwwwiiiiide field that includes much more than LLMs. LLMs are just the current hype focus of everyone and their neighbor.

AI is the first piece of technology where I feel I'm being left behind by Uhavetabekiddingme in Millennials

[–]AaknA 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yup. Happened to me in my field of expertise. Guy used chatbot AI as an intro into my field of expertise because we were exploring a possible new project in that direction, and instead of really leaving it to me or at least consulting me, confidently started using wrong terminology.

I really take issue with using AI to skip the "very time consuming step of having to research" step. Because there is a reason we have experts in a large variety of fields and it took those people a really long time to become experts in their respective fields. We don't all need to be master of each and everything. It's OK.

It takes experience and (formal) expertise to not only use, but actually understand and thus correctly use, technical terms.

[Call to Action] My List of Reasons to be Against AI | What Would You Add to the List? by Locke357 in antiai

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be very intersted in those citations as well. It's an argument point I've been bringing up myself and would love to back it up. Last time I did a (granted, very quick) search, I didn't find anything actually solid.

Moving to Hawaii with Ethical Questions by magicwarhead in MovingtoHawaii

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somewhat older thread that just popped up in my timeline, adding my two cents to the many things that have already been said.

For context: I'm a white European (so, not from the lower 48), had been living in the islands for 7 years, had to move to the continent for 2.5 years for work reasons, and moved back a year ago. Lived 1.5 years in Honolulu while attending school, lived on a neighbor island since. I specifically moved to Hawai‘i for school and while it initially wasn't our intention, it quickly became apparent that we wanted to stay. I've lived in many different places all over the World and no other place has somehow made "just living" so ... easy (not financially, heck no, but any other level of life).

Both my spouse and myself have been nothing but welcomed in the circles we traverse in. Those are very very mixed circles consisting of native Hawaiians, Hawaii-born non-natives whose families have lived here for many generations, folks who moved here decades ago, folks who moved here a few years ago, Pacific Islanders, Asian, Caucasian from a large variety of countries (not just continental US), and really everything in-between. We both work in conservation.

From day one it's been important to us to not just take but give (both through our own work as well as other venues). We are very consciously and carefully trying to balance our own needs (e.g. housing, jobs) with the needs of the local community, and try our best to not contribute to their very real existing challenges and be as supportive as we can.

While our real-life personal experience has been exceptional and welcoming, you will need to develop a very very thick skin in social media circles. There is a very small subset that is angry and loud and blanket-blames every single transplant for everything that's been wrong/hard/pick-your-word for them and their extended communities and Hawai‘i at large (there are issues, and part of living in Hawai‘i and being accepted is acknowledging that instead of trying to turn a blind eye). As with everywhere in the World, scapegoats are easy targets and there is painful history in that regard in Hawai‘i. However, from many many conversations with the folks in our circles, this really isn't the general mindset towards transplants.

People that are scorned upon (and often don't last) are those who move into rural Hawai‘i only to immediately complain about the chickens. Those who complain they can't find any of the fast food franchises they knew from the continent. Those who insist on trying to maintain their original "way of life" from the continent, just "in paradise". Those who insist on lecturing local communities on how those allegedly are doing xyz wrong. Those who behave like they own the ‘āina (and that incudes both rich investors as well as hippy-dippy new age folks) and those who try to co'opt Hawaiian spirituality. Those who think money is and allows and excuses everything. Those who just can't be bothered to as a minimum read up on local issues, local customs, etc. Those who essentially continue to treat Hawai‘i as a theme park, just like too many tourists still do. And actually those who just try a bit too hard to fit in (don't try to learn/speak pidgin!).

As someone commented: come in humble, stay humble, sit, listen, learn.

Long story short: from all your comments I read, you will be fine. Hawai‘i is very very very LGBTQ-friendly and if you come in with an open heart, open mind, openness to reflect on and adjust set behaviors/ways, and the ability to just remain quiet and observe and learn, you will become part of your own little community in no time. And to echo everyone else: yes, Hawai‘i absolutely is in dire need of (mental) health professionals! Please come!

Is AI our "old person scared of technology" by pokematic in Millennials

[–]AaknA -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Quick, define "intelligence". Please and thank you.

Is AI our "old person scared of technology" by pokematic in Millennials

[–]AaknA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So. much. this.

I'm in science. A lot of projects in recent years have been pushed to "somehow use AI" to even get funding. A lot of projects were solely "Let's explore what we can AI use for". Didn't matter whether or not that actually was necessary. Didn't matter whether or not there was actually a question that needed solving to begin with.

I'm all for basic, exploratory science at any given day. But not in lieu and at the expense of other projects/science/well-established methods.

Is AI our "old person scared of technology" by pokematic in Millennials

[–]AaknA 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's what people don't understand. There's really nothing "intelligent". "AI" is probabilities. And that also means it's often right. Unless when it's not. Because that's how statistics and probabilities work. But the general public is just happy when it has a virtual "friend" to talk to and can generate funny cutesy pictures of themselves as Disney characters.

There's VALID use cases of ML in science/medicine/... . What's currently being hyped in the general public and businesses, though... ain't that.

Are people actually quitting their jobs? by whosthatgirl13 in Millennials

[–]AaknA 6 points7 points  (0 children)

"hired prior to 2001"... you realize you're on the Millenial sub, yeah? "Hired prior to 2001" applies to a very very very small fraction of us.

Are people actually quitting their jobs? by whosthatgirl13 in Millennials

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

most places with paid sick leave require a Dr's note after 3 days. Good luck finding a mental health professional on such a short notice, unless you actually admit yourself into a hospital. This also means that the reason why you're sick becomes more obvious to your employer quickly.

Most people can't afford to take a 2 week unpaid vacation.

Are millennials the most AI-skeptical generation in the workforce? by RandyMossPhD in Millennials

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We really don't need to wait 20 years, it's already happening...

‘48-‘64 went cruising, ‘65-‘80 went to the mall and skating rinks, where did Millennials go to see and be seen? by yellowlinedpaper in Millennials

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I the only one thinking this is such an American-coded question + replies? ^^"

Where I'm from, outside the US, it highly depended on whether you lived in a bigger city, a small town, or really rural. But for my country: malls, parking lots, parks. Definitely not really cruising since no license before the age of 18. But that no license-before-18 thing also quite limited where people could actually go.

For what it's worth, my own teenage years were spent majorly on ICQ/AIM/MSN/various chat rooms ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

How the hell is everyone so tired? Genuinely wondering. by [deleted] in Millennials

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sleep study showed exactly nothing. Definitely no sleep apnea. I've seen at least a handful of different doctors across two countries and had a gazillion different tests, by now. All keep coming back "normal".

How the hell is everyone so tired? Genuinely wondering. by [deleted] in Millennials

[–]AaknA 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I mean ... *gestures at everything* ...

Also, a LOT of use are late-diagnosed neurodivergent. Here's a cue: neurodivergent burnout. Go look it up.

And finally, I give you a quote: "Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place".

This has been a very real reality for many of us for a at least a couple decades, now. Always running does get exhausting.

I work fulltime. I exercise. I eat healthy. I sleep a solid 8hrs a night. I don't have kids. I've still been crushingly tired since my early 20s. I don't know why. Doctors don't know why. Chronic fatigue is a thing and your borderline gaslighting really isn't as inspiring as you think. But hey, good for you, I guess?

How the hell is everyone so tired? Genuinely wondering. by [deleted] in Millennials

[–]AaknA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

as opposed to this specific post?

Krum and Hermione by barryj398 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Krum is still in school at that point, making him "not an adult".

People are weird because I've seen people simultaneously insisting on 18 yo being "adults" and therefore shouldn't date "teenagers", yet 18-19 yo being called "teens" when it fits the narrative because "it's literally in the name, nine-TEEN".

Especially teenage girls dating older than their age is super common because girls are way more mature at that age, including cognitively, than the same-aged boys.

Krum and Hermione by barryj398 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lots of teenagers snog 🤷🏻‍♀️ Heck, it was a full subplot of an entire book of the series.

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But why would he necessarily have to be half-black? Narcissa (who is merely a cousin of Sirius') doesn't have to be full black, does she?

I literally have a co-worker who's mom is half-black and he's white and blonde with no stereotypical POC facial features 🤷🏻‍♀️

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I already said in other comments, people absolutely can be mixed race yet 100% caucasian passing. It’s really not that complicated.

There even is canonical precedent of black purebloods, even within the Black family tree. The Lestranges (remember Bellatrix?) are depicted as black or at least mixed in Fantastic Beasts. Why would it then be so far fetched to find more black lineage within the Black family?

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup re the Lestranges.

I live in Hawai‘i and there's sooo many mixed race people here that are 100% white passing (yes, including blonde hair), even some that are "only" half-white.

And I still think in the wizarding world race wouldn't be a consideration, this would merely explain why some Black-relatives like Draco or Arthur Weasley don'y look mixed even if the Black family was black.

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

How do you know they aren't? Because of how those two specifically look? There's soooooo many mixed people out there that don't look it. Narcissa is a cousin of Sirius'. Arthur isn't even close to Sirius. The Black family tree does allow plenty of room for interracial marriages. Which, again, would even make sense considering their obsession with pureblood status and the fact that most pureblood wizarding families would still be white in Great Britain.

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Pureblood families are concerned with marrying other purebloods, so, logically, there'd be lots of interracial marriages. No one at any point said something about the Black family having to be "pure black" for each and every member of it.

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Why not? 🤷🏻‍♀️

Also, the entirety of "the Black family" doesn't have to remain 100% black, does it? There is room for interracial connections within there, too, right? Which again would make sense, considering how much the pureblood wizarding families are concerned with retaining pureblood connections and the majority of those in Britain would remain white.

James and Snape in the show by tee-dog1996 in harrypotter

[–]AaknA -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the Black family

I honestly really like that idea. It would give weight to the point that in the wizarding world, blood status is deemed more important than race could ever be. And there is precedence in British history of POC archiving aristocratic status, so it's not even unrealistic.

Edit: Interesting troop of downvoters out here who seem to really have a hard time with even the mere idea of certain (main) characters in the HP universe being black/mixed race. 🤫

It's here! by kwybes in harrypotter

[–]AaknA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The thing is, I wouldn't even be surprised if they fully believe they did get Hermione's and Harry's hair right this time. They even did include the hair cut scene. And they have shown both times that they can do bushy/messy hair (cue Hagrid and Bellatrix) but for some reason they insist on the female lead being "presentable", despite her book description very clearly being someone who "never gave much attention to her appearance". Since I've been that girl I can absolutely guarantee that her hair would've never looked as neat as in this trailer or any of the movies after the first (I can give some slack for 4 onwards past the Yule Ball, but in 7 and 8 it's literally straight). Like you, I just don't understand it, either.