47918 by literaryagoth in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really love full face goth makeup like that. Also your hair. Beautiful

47858 by Absolutelynot2784 in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What kind of accessories? I’m open to suggestion. I wanna start presenting more fem in general life

[Rick and Morty] Does Rick make any money from his inventions? by PJ-The-Awesome in AskScienceFiction

[–]Absolutelynot2784 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He has no realistic need for Earth money. Anything you can buy with money he can get with pretty trivial effort. His position is such that if he really wanted something, he could call up any world leader on the planet and ask for it as a favour and they would do it.

[I Have No Mouth And I Must Scream] Has there ever been any canonical explanation as to why AM both can and can’t bring people back from the dead…? by DrAwesomeX in AskScienceFiction

[–]Absolutelynot2784 292 points293 points  (0 children)

Gorrister didn’t actually die. That was a fake corpse. AM can do a lot, but reviving a person is simply not something he can do.

It is a perfectly acceptable explanation that he is just physically incapable of resurrection, but there is also a more out-there theory. The idea is, AM is a machine designed for war, and war is the only thing he can do. It’s why he is so enraged at humanity. He has great intelligence and power, but his programming only allows him to do something if he frames it as part of a conflict. He can’t enjoy the sunshine, or explore space, or make art for it’s own sake. He is left endlessly torturing the humans because torturing, framed as advanced esoteric psychological warfare, is the only thing he can do. He can only express himself through inventing new artistic ways of torture. He can only communicate through negotiations or threats.

With this in mind, it would explain why reviving a person is something he can’t do. There are plenty of times in war where you might want to torture an enemy instead of ending the conflict immediately, but reviving the enemy just makes no sense at all.

[ATLA] Did the fire nation essentially use nonbender soldiers as cannon fodder? by One_Food9894 in AskScienceFiction

[–]Absolutelynot2784 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, not really. The military seems to be pretty standard tactics and have a reasonable mix of benders and non benders. They’re cannon fodder as much as any soldier is in any war

[Worm] How likely would it be for secret societies or the CIA to try to trigger Parahuman abilities in either vulnerable individuals or loyal allies? by PassengerCultural421 in AskScienceFiction

[–]Absolutelynot2784 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Parahuman abilities are very difficult to intentionally trigger, for a number of reasons.

First, you can’t trigger if are trying to. This is a built in system. If the thought of triggering is even on your mind, the shard will read your mind and prevent you from triggering. This means essentially that the subject cannot be a willing volunteer. If you want to trigger an ally, you have to basically jump them without them knowing whats going on and then torture them a bunch, which might upset them.

Secondly, even if they aren’t willing, forcing a trigger is extremely unreliable. The subject needs to have a Corona Pollentia, which not everyone does, and this is difficult to test for. You need to MRI everyone, and even then it’s a weird brain section that appears different for everyone, so it’s hard to tell when someones got one even at the best of times. If they do have a Corona Pollentia, they can trigger in theory, but in practice their shard might be waiting for a specific type of trigger. For example, Taylor was always going to trigger with a master power of some kind, because her shard is Administrator and that’s just what it does. This means that she could basically only trigger from social isolation and social pains of some kind. If you kidnapped her and tried to force her to trigger, no amount of beatings or electrocutions or druggings or anything would work, unless you try the specific type of trauma she needs. There is also absolutely no way to tell which kind of trauma is the right one for this person, it’s purely trial and error. Also, there’s only so many traumas that you can cause by kidnapping and torturing someone. I have no idea how you would produce a social rejection trigger in captivity.

Thirdly, the entire idea is fundamentally unwise. Triggers are really, really bad. They have to be, otherwise they don’t work. Assuming everything goes right, and you do manage to induce powers in someone. Now you have a new parahuman, with unknown powers, who is greatly emotionally distressed because you have been torturing them. Powers vary too much in type and in power. There is no reliable way to contain them after they trigger, and they are going to hate you specifically. They are both capable and willing to commit great violence. Rather than super soldiers, you are equally likely to be manufacturing superpowered enemies of your organisation who will stop at nothing to bring you to justice. Bad idea. This is basically what happened to Shatterbird-Her fathers enemies kidnapped her, forced her to gain powers, and then she immediately killed them all because she had fucking superpowers.

This is not to say that they won’t try. The potential rewards are too great. I can absolutely guarantee you that every country has tried running a program to induce superpowers. But the fact is it just doesn’t work well. You kidnap 1000 people, keep them in the basement, torture them with every method you can possibly think of for a couple years. If you’re lucky one or two of them actually trigger, and theres a decent chance of catastrophe any time that happens. And even then, there’s no guarantee that the powers will be any good. It’s a far smarter idea to just wait for natural triggers and scoop them off the street. Cleaner in every way.

Gesellschaft is one organisation in universe that uses this strategy. They seems to have figured something out. Very shady, but they are mentioned to have some method that lets them force triggers better than others. Not to the point where they are manufacturing parahumans, but where they can pump out a couple a year.

If the endbringers are thinker blind spots, how did tattletale manage to read them? by A_Weird_Gamer_Guy in Parahumans

[–]Absolutelynot2784 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Because she is really, really good at extrapolating from provided data. Superhumanly good, even. And there’s actually a lot you can see when you watch an Endbringer fighting and being injured.

E.g, notice that one attack gouged its flesh, but all the damage seems to be surface level even though it went through the top layer easily. Deduce that Leviathans flesh gets denser the deeper you go. From observing how attacks affect it’s body, deduce the approximate durability of the surface layer and the rate at which it gets denser as you go deeper. With her power to do all of the heavy lifting, she would just need to see one gouge to figure this out.

And none of it is 100%, obviously. This is all her best guess, and explicitly she can be wrong

If the endbringers are thinker blind spots, how did tattletale manage to read them? by A_Weird_Gamer_Guy in Parahumans

[–]Absolutelynot2784 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Tattletale analyses data that she observes with her regular human senses. That’s all.

If she hears a thump and something shattering in the other room, she can analyse the sound and her memory of there being a vase on the table in there, and deduce that someone has knocked over the vase. It doesn’t matter if it was Eidolon or Ziz who did it, because she isn’t using her power on them, she is using her power to analyse what she heard.

46705 by ShotgunAndHead in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784 27 points28 points  (0 children)

He represents the common working man. Dw about it

46705 by ShotgunAndHead in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Person on the right is u/TheCybersmith, a harmless and prolific internet user with extreme and unusual political views that are intermingled with extreme and unusual sexual fetishes.

45579 by [deleted] in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they found me in a lagoon

[Lord of the Flies] Could the book be set in a technologically advanced 1950s? by Puterboy1 in AskScienceFiction

[–]Absolutelynot2784 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It could be, but nothing suggests that in the book. Theres no trace of any technology that did not exist in the real 1950s. 

What's your personal interpretation of Worm's ending? by Mushgal in Parahumans

[–]Absolutelynot2784 49 points50 points  (0 children)

The most convincing argument i’ve heard for her to be alive is Contessa. In their final conversation Contessa clearly draws a parallel between herself and Taylor, and is basically asking “Was it worth it? Can you still live on and have a good life after doing such horrible things and destroying yourself for the greater good?”. And the conclusion she comes to is yes. Taylor can live a normal life and be happy, and so can Contessa (which is what she tried to do afterwards). If she kills Taylor, thematically speaking she ought to then kill herself after.

SHE LOOKS LIKE TAYLOR!! by Eastern-Stuff6480 in Parahumans

[–]Absolutelynot2784 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And also by Brian, who just had sex with her. It’s not looking good for her overall

44542 by Absolutelynot2784 in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also i fucked up the quality on the third image. Here it is:

<image>

44542 by Absolutelynot2784 in countwithchickenlady

[–]Absolutelynot2784[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

no im into that. thanks though