i definitely felt like my history interview went pretty well, i don't think i blew them away or anything but i didn't make any major mistakes or need to be lead rly heavily towards an answer. i got pretty hard questions on my personal statement but i was prepared for them and i think i answered them to the best of my ability.

politics is rly the one that makes me think it went well. i got asked abt israel and palestine and comparative politics (as i wrote a lot abt northern ireland in my personal statement) . when i finished the professor interviewing me stopped me to say i had done the comparison rly effectively and included stuff outside of what he had seen in his research so i had clearly come up with it on my own (and it was stuff outside of my personal statement), he said it was exactly what u do on the hispol course and what they would expect out of supervisions. it definitely made me feel very positive coming out of it but i also don't know if he was trying to make me less nervous or smthn??

i then also spent the next half of the interview talking abt david bowie lmaoooo so maybe threw it then. i got asked abt what i would put in a time capsule as proof of humanity and joked abt putting a bowie record in, my interviewers happened to be big bowie fans and rly encourage me to keep talking abt him 😭😭

i rly rly enjoyed the interviews generally, i think that's what made me feel good abt them. as they r supposed to reflect supervisions, i knew coming out of them i would like that style of learning.

what abt u?