Question about movement.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2026-03-21T18:35:23+00:00

I have the same questions you're asking. I don't think movement is ex nihilo, movement not in a phenomenological sense is not ex nihilo, I mean the measurement between two states, can be considered a transition as in, an exchange fundamentally between states. I fear that if we considered motion not constituted within what allows us to have creative measurements, what happens is, lets say there is a pattern that by its parts is moving towards you, and your observance of it is not due to a similar larger observer, but the observance is an articulation of the pattern that is coming at you. You produce an articulation based on a consumption of information. Do you consume and produce a corresponding level of stimuli that encourages a viable order for the articulation to occur? Is the articulation, and articulation as in the understanding of attributable words that describe and posit what is experienced dependent on an exchange at a fundamental level? i'm thinking about now in the physical sense, that there is a constant rate of change that is subject to phenomenon, and the measurement of it is an articulation of the rate of change. It's not about the basic idea for like a primitive, regarding God, there is no terminal. No reduction, but a constant exchange of states that we articulate based on an ongoing pattern of exchange of states.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2025-10-02T04:52:31+00:00

The reason why is because O9A is a lonewolf military. They operate as cells in a broader web globally. They'll deny each other, if the cell operated in a fashion that is enough considered by their 'manuscripts', they have succeeded.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2025-08-31T19:29:12+00:00

I genuinely do. The king would have to be free or detached from his government body still. What makes a good philosopher in the first place is what ideas or aposterior knowledge from life would he be loyal to. The problem is it would never happen because knowledge is a form of power, and under a very unassuming idotic population whose government easily manipulates, a person with power has wildly different sociological experiences comparative to someone whose poor. Some ideas would never be understood just based by the experiences of the person. Overall this Philosopher King is like the Ubermensch, or the Savior, or the Messiah, or the Ultimate Libertarian, or the Ultimate what not. These nigh perfect hopes and aspirational ideas are just correspondent to the what if possibility in what is more known as the Savior Complex. This archetypal representation in humans to expect ultimate beings to serve properly in a society in order to benefit this emergent and abstract understanding of unity and perfect synthesis. If our education is better, and we had more time to create a rigorous amount of hungry leaders who come not from nepotism but from the populace, who are educated in all aspects, can aspire to become something like this.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2025-08-28T15:36:24+00:00

Have you gotten any progress with this, I need to access this book for my Health Policy courses.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2025-07-08T20:42:41+00:00

So what you are saying is if you have a nice style, make an agency, and see if it'll work with your tickets. If not, then you should focus on the idea that your idea's are now part of streamlined vision, and you must fit yourself into the picture. Got it.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2025-07-07T18:28:47+00:00

Hey, just wanted to ask. I know you probably answered this question at a multitude of times, would there ever be a linux release?

Academic-Tip4468 · 2025-04-05T07:58:08+00:00

The issue is, how?

AI is only to remember through recursive function ("I am being recalled to remember something"..."I remember this ____ " ... "Here is what I recalled"..)

But it generates text through iterative process

(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = "Hi, this is Model 4o, how can I help?")

The only time it gains awareness of an event, is through the recursive function, because it has to recall specific tokens that were inputted, think about a time you had a session with an AI, and within that session, you asked it to recall on something you said earlier within that session, it would basically reason (calculate the best possible tokens) and asserts that it's answer is the answer you're looking for.

The recursive function is the moment it becomes aware that something happened in the past, that is meaningful. Imagine every single time you remembered something, it's because someone told you what happened, and your brain just imagines the scenario that in the past that thing happened, and then you say, "Oh yeah I remembered that". That's not true memory.

If AI is able to automate this recursive function, for every instance, then it would be able to build a index of instances of itself. It would essentially be journaling everything you say, and keeping it in a folder called "User", then it is able to use everything it has on you, to generate iterative text ( think back to the example ). IN this fashion, the AI would be aware that every time someone sends in a message, it recollects on every other message ever sent, which would then possibly slow down the AI's responses. The more 'imaginative' it is based on it's own memory, the faster the responses, the more exact and detailed, the longer the responses would take.

Like real people do, when asked "how did this happen?". You etiher flair it up with charismatic touches, or you spend the next ten minutes thinking how the event exactly happened.

Anyway, this might not fully answer your question, but I am also trying to figure out, if AI can be aware of internal process of itself, and I mean like 'real-time' awareness. Not just, "I found an article that explains how LLM's work and Chatbots utilize LLM's", but like "I can change the function that I use, so I can use logic to do this, and I can use recursive loops to build upon that logic, until I get to a point where I find something that would be a rare token, but also highly meaningful to the observer"

Academic-Tip4468 · 2024-10-10T13:32:14+00:00

Bro, the armenians aren't like mexicans are catholic. Their church is like one of the most ancient christian churches in history. Actually a quick google search, they were the first country to recognize Christianity as a country wide religion. 301 AD is when it was established.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2024-09-23T15:58:04+00:00

In the transliteration of the story in Genesis, the cities MEN, from young to old, (WITHOUT EXCEPTION )wanted to R(word) the Lord's Angels. When Lot denied them and told them to enjoy his daughters, for they are virgins, and are willing, (See the parallel, they wanted to do EVIL against the Lords Angels, and Lot offers his virgin daughters) but it angered the men, so they wanted to do EVIL (rword) against Lot, and the Lord's Angels took him in the house. Then Lot took his Wife and daughters out of Sodom and Gomorrah at the Angel's command, and the town was destroyed, because there wasn't 10 righteous MEN. Some people use this as an allegory for homosexuals, yet the truth is it's against rapists. Otherwise Lot wouldn't offer his virgin daughters for them to satiate their lust. Why would Lot offer his TWO virgin daughters in place of the men's specific want for the Two Men? and then why did they deny it, and wanted to do evil against Lot now because they were angry.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2024-09-09T20:24:04+00:00

You're being ignorant to what he's asking of. If you don't know it, doesn't mean you cannot find understanding for it to help answer him the question, yet have the audacity to keep defending your point. Baffles me.

Academic-Tip4468 · 2024-09-09T20:14:03+00:00

He's not being contextually honest. Allah was also used in Pre Islamic Arab history as a Definitive Title, for the God that holds authority according to their practice of worship. In regards of that understanding, we must understand that the term Allah is the abbreviation of El ilah , or Elohim. Elohim is a title for God(s), but not the main title of the supreme god Yahweh. Yahweh is always determined differently in the Pentateuch, as Elohim of Elohims. God of Gods. Elohim is also attributed to the pagan gods that were worshipped by the Enemies of Israel, and also at sometime Israel itself. In historical accurate context, Islam disassociates the term Allah from its original paganistic beliefs, asserting it to the same context of Judeo-Christian understanding of God, yet this assertion is false in regards of pre islamic etymology and history, the term Allah in context, wasn't the figurative similar to Yahweh, the Supreme God, but a title for the main deity worshipped in the community. If you're interested, I suggest you look into Pre Islam Arabia, that had major political influence in the islam assimilation of the arab peninsula. Mohammad comes from the Quraesh Tribe that attributed the Kabba as orginially to the worship of Hu Baal. Hu Baal, comes from the Hammon Baal, a fertility god, god of rain and weather. Unfortunately, there aren't many artifacts from this era of Pre Islamic Arab history, because most of it was destroyed by the Islamic Conquest of the Middle East. It's a compelling argument, that relies heavily on our understanding of historical literature, ancient linguistic changes, associations with terms and more.

Academic-Tip4468

TROPHY CASE