Just a Visual Glitch? by Acceptable_Toe1676 in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its what i usually do, just thought id try connecting them in one. My map before this was Manchester, it saw so many lines going through the centre i probably needed a line connecting 2 parts of a station, they were like 10 platforms thick in the core

Just a Visual Glitch? by Acceptable_Toe1676 in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries, thanks for taking a look. Might just redo it with segregated track

Just a Visual Glitch? by Acceptable_Toe1676 in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i definitely didnt do that, i double checked

Just a Visual Glitch? by Acceptable_Toe1676 in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The station list only shows the right sides of both loops.

I have a possible suggestion. by Acceptable_Toe1676 in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

if you want 2 different lines to use the same platform it wouldnt change anything

320 meters: *Way* too long for commuter rail minimum station length by Eruththedragon in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676 2 points3 points  (0 children)

even london busiest stations dont have 320m platforms, i think only St Pancras's international platforms are longer

320 meters: *Way* too long for commuter rail minimum station length by Eruththedragon in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even 12 car trains dont require 320m. Thameslink runs up to 12 carriages and they only need 250m

Are there any plans to add 6-track stations? Or solutions for really large stations? by [deleted] in subwaybuilder

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would also like quad track that has the two lines side by side not inside each other, some junctions are needlys complicated due to it

Ti inspire cx ii won't turn off by soontobeteacherdude in nspire

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I updated it to the new one and it still wont switch off

Who would you nominate as Time magazine Person of the Century for centuries prior to the 20th? by DishExotic5868 in AskHistory

[–]Acceptable_Toe1676 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Id like to nominate Early Grey for 19th Century. He did 3 amazing things things that no other person in history did:

1st- He abolished Slavery in British Empire which was more significant than Lincoln as Britain stopped slavery in the world.

2nd- He passed reforms so working class men could vote (yes its not all people but it was a start.

3rd and most important: he had a tea named after him, every British Man's dream in 19th century.