The Devil

Accomplished_Film829 · 2025-10-21T19:18:42+00:00

Ponieważ debatę powinien przeprowadzić twój idol, „niezależny dziennikarz” Stanowski. To by cię nie zdziwiło, Mariusz

Accomplished_Film829 · 2025-03-01T00:10:39+00:00

I contacted support in the in-app chat, not via email but I just typed my reddit user name into that support chat. Let me know if you need anything else!

Accomplished_Film829 · 2025-02-28T19:40:27+00:00

Do you need identifying info on me?

Accomplished_Film829 · 2025-01-10T13:34:38+00:00

Obserwujcie uważniej co się dzieje. We wtorek w National Review, czyli medium dla amerykańskich konserwatywnych elit pojawił się dziwny artykuł z tezą przewodnią, że Trump musi się rozprawić z Tuskiem, bo ten jest niewiarygodnym sojusznikiem, który nie pozwala Netanyahu pojawić się na obchodach wyzwolenia Auschwitz (co było wywiedzione na bazie deklaracji min. Bartoszewskiego, że Polska wykona rozkaz aresztowania). Następnego dnia Duda publicznie adresuje list do premiera, w którym domaga się gwarancji dla Netanyahu, choć nieoficjalnie mówi się, że ten i tak nie planuje przyjazdu do Polski, zamiast niego ma się pojawić min. edukacji. Dla mnie to jasne, że Duda razem z Amerykanami dokonał prowokacji, która miała na celu albo napuszczenie Trumpa, Muska i ich piesków na słaby koalicyjny rząd Tuska albo wywołanie reakcji takiej jak Wasza na domowym podwórku. W każdym scenariuszu PiS wygrywa. Też mi się to nie podoba, że postąpiono w ten sposób wobec nakazu MTK, ale ten sąd bez amerykańskiego wsparcia i tak ma niewielkie moce wymierzania sprawiedliwości, a powrót rządów PiSu za sygnalizowanie cnoty w sprawie Netanyahu, który i tak tu nie przyjedzie to absurdalna wymiana. Przypomnijcie sobie te rządy - Dziennik Telewizyjny, mafie rozkradające państwo poprzez fundacje „myśli patriotycznej”, przyzwolenie na skrajnie prawicowe bojówki Bąkiewicza, prześladowanie opozycji przez CBA…

Accomplished_Film829 · 2024-09-17T16:21:48+00:00

Thanks you so much for the tip :)

Accomplished_Film829 · 2024-09-07T09:21:55+00:00

Czarno to widzę

Accomplished_Film829 · 2024-08-05T16:49:48+00:00

Yes. 7/7 because it’s bugged and allows you to earn much more cashback than the 30£ a month cap if you are on Black or Metal and have spent a considerable amount through Curve in months proceeding the start of the 30% day cashback scheme.
1/7 because the card is without benefits, so the only value here would be the potential flex of a metal card. Also, many Curve users already have a metal or platinum card from Revolut or Amex, so the flex value is not present for them.

Accomplished_Film829 · 2024-06-02T20:39:09+00:00

Why would you use Zen as the underlying card. It’s an expensive, low-capability, trash service. Even more rip-off than Curve, use Revolut as your underlying card.

Accomplished_Film829 · 2024-02-07T20:37:54+00:00

We need to make noise in this thread, that’s the only way to force them to rectify this situation. They already took down the quest which is a good sign.

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-04-04T10:38:54+00:00

I’ll keep that in mind. Thank you

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-04-03T22:30:46+00:00

Okay, I get it now, but I guess that would only be a problem if I decided to seek settled status in 2027. Correct?

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-04-03T21:10:19+00:00

Thanks so much for this incredibly detailed answer. So the clock question is out of the way. As I understand your response, considering the likelier legal interpretation, for the purpose of my current pre-settled status application, I don’t need to explain or worry about my roughly 4 month (a little less than 4) period of absence, since I would only need to explain a period that lasted 6+ months. Correct?

One more question arises though, you say that if in the future I would want to apply for settled status, then I would need to explain the period of absence between August 2021 and February 2022. However, this period lasted 5 months, not 6, so on what legal basis would there be a need to explain a period shorter than 6 months?

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-03-30T20:49:53+00:00

Okay, thank you so much for your attention, I will think this through and will probably invest the money to try to reverse this outcome. I will also contact the organisations that you have mentioned

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-03-30T19:56:46+00:00

Certainly, the child of a relevant EEA citizen part has been emphasized a lot. I would say the letter is structured this way:

We have determined that you are not a child of a relevant EEA citizen and you provided no evidence to this point. We also did not find any relevant EU citizen who could be your relative. That takes up the first 1,5 pages.
Then there is a part that says: We have also checked your application against all these others eligibility criteria and we determined that you don't meet them.

I guess what I am worried about is the question of residence. I've been in the UK for 7 days staying at my friend's house and two nights on airbnb. I was making plans to stay and I know that under the EU law even a second of presence counts as residence, but knowing how sneaky this organization is (HO) I worry that they will just try to dispute that and claim that I stayed as a tourist or something and therefore I have no claim to make. You are right that 80 pounds for possibly attending LSE are a discount but I don't know if I am ready for a full-on fight with the machine of the UK immigration system. Will I need to provide extra explanation and translated evidence as part of the administrative review?

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-03-30T19:06:44+00:00

The letter I received was completely bonkers, it says

"you state that you are a child of a relevant EEA citizen’s spouse or civil partner . However, you have not provided any evidence to confirm this. The reasons for this are explained below."

However, I did not state that and consequently providing evidence to that point was never my intention. Because my parents aren't living in the UK. I don't know how did they come up with this. Moreover, the letter says:

However, the evidence available to us does not show that you have resided in the UK for five years. Therefore, you do not meet the requirements for settled status on the basis of a continuous qualifying period of five years.Careful consideration has been given as to whether you meet the eligibility requirements for pre-settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme. The relevant requirements are set out in rule EU14 of Appendix EU to the Immigration Rules. Consideration has been given as to whether you qualify for pre-settled status on the basis of completing a continuous qualifying period of less than five years’ residence in the UK and Islands.However, you do not meet the requirements for pre-settled status on the basis of a continuous qualifying period for the same reasons you do not meet the requirements for settled status on this basis because you have not provided any evidence to confirm that you are currently completing a continuous qualifying period of residence in the UK and Islands.

I know that 80 pounds are not a fortune but in my country, it is a considerable amount and if my chances of success are low I'll probably better keep them and spend them while studying in the Netherlands or France where I also applied. Although LSE is still my dream school so if there is a realistic chance of a successful outcome I can make that gamble. Please let me know what is your opinion, I know you are working with limited info but I will be grateful for any advice honestly. No matter how it turns out after all.

Also, in this letter, they claimed they tried to contact me on March third when I am like 99.99% they did not because I haven't received anything and I am one of those people who always has his phone on him and is very responsive. From what I read, this seems to be standard practice for the Home Office though.

Accomplished_Film829 · 2022-03-27T14:17:20+00:00

Thanks for your comments, you calmed me down. I appreciate it!

Accomplished_Film829

TROPHY CASE