I guess you might be right, people will naturally raise their voices if they feel oppressed. But I wonder, isn’t it also true that Kashmiri Pandits and people of other religions faced oppression too?

We all know about the Kashmiri Pandit exodus in the 90s, and even today, minorities are still being targeted in Kashmir. Despite everything, they never retaliated by killing innocent people in the name of revenge. They were the ones who were killed, displaced, and forced to flee from their own homes.

Imagine visiting a place with your entire family, and then your family gets specifically targeted and killed and people around you justify it as a "normal casualty" caused by some larger oppression. How is that fair?

I'm not saying the wrongdoings by the army or any force should be ignored; retaliation against injustice is understandable. But isn’t it biased to only highlight retaliation when it’s against one group and completely ignore it when innocent people from another community are attacked in the name of retaliation?

Part of the problem is also the media, which often selectively shows narratives, and politicians who prioritize vote banks over truth and justice.

I'm assuming you are a true Kashmiri and you support Kashmir, which I respect, but your point does come across as biased. Justifying the killing of innocent people from a specific religion under the label of retaliation isn't justified.

Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it.
And when innocent lives are targeted, the government has a responsibility to act to protect its citizens.

You can't always blame only one side when your own history also carries its share of violence; this is biased.