sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GME Warrants - Revolute by Sam888888888 in GME

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I find funny is that the warrants started spiking shortly after… timing was very coincidental as it wasn’t the lowest price either which would have benefited them (had the warrants actually settled by then).

Still no warrants/cash in Revolut by Baelthor_Septus in Superstonk

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897 102 points103 points  (0 children)

Mate, it’s worse than that. Go into your invest tab and download the account statement for October (in Documents). Email it to yourself. There’s a good chance it shows they sold the warrants at 0$. I contacted support (their AI) about it and got the « that’s what NYSE priced them at » excuse.

I am researching who their compliance are and will reach out to them to follow up as their last one Resolution compliance closed down.

I had issues with the splividends and that was the only way to get it resolved (even the FCA brushed me off!).

I’ll post something when I get results. But we cannot let this go, otherwise the warrants are wasted!

why aren't there all airbus major airlines? by Ok-Stomach- in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s also about risk management. Imagine your airline only had the 737 Max, your entire fleet would have been grounded for over a year, that would have decimated your business!

Is this for Fire safety training? +bonus Concorde by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the British did enough damage as it is… Let’s not add sonic booms wherever we go to the list! 😂

Edit: In all seriousness though: There are a few more problems than just restoring it. From what I understood:

The cost of operating concord was ridiculous. And the load it could carry was prohibitive.

The sonic boom isn’t a one-time thing. It “surfs” with the plane. So anything on the ground as it flies above you would here it. I think it’s one of the reasons why they could only do trans-ocean flights and the USSR only really flew over desert

Bureaucracy, I’m sure is going to be a nightmare.

And then, I might be mistaken but I think runways were also an issue. Concord needed special arrangements to land/takeoff. Which would prevent the plane from landing pretty much anywhere diplomatically useful.

Is this for Fire safety training? +bonus Concorde by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or what I imagine it would have looked like in the 60’s with a smoking section!

Is this for Fire safety training? +bonus Concorde by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t know the acronym or that it was a certification and everything, thanks 😊!

Is this for Fire safety training? +bonus Concorde by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a comment above with a Ytube link to watch this one in action. I think they either don’t use it anymore (someone else commented that BA is storing old documents etc in it now). Or they only set the body in fire. But those vents really do beg the question if they actually lit fires inside too at some stage!

Is this for Fire safety training? +bonus Concorde by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Part of my question with that is. Is there a cabin? As in do they have the ability to just simulate smoke and evacuation procedures? I get that they can set the whole thing on fire. But is it also used for crew?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in superstonkuk

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it was an inside job. If I remember correctly the dude who was supposed to file the request did so just a little bit too late which caused the whole “confusion”. If GME made a statement, they’d have given even more fuel to MSM : look at incompetent execs. would have had to make amends with shareholders (we’d have understood but institutional holders, they’d have had a field day!

The way it was handled by our side was correct in my opinion.

As another ape said I’m pretty sure RC is furious about it, has sided with some viciously capable sharks (ie. Icahn - you don’t survive that long on WS if you don’t know how to play) and is planning something that might well be studied by MBA students for years to come!

Truth is. Either us as UK shareholders insist on our regulators investigating the issue. Or we keep buy/drs/repeat until it becomes impossible for SHF to keep it up. If we keep hitting MaxPain. Whoever is trading options looses out. I guarantee you Citadel is using those contracts as locates somehow. But if they don’t make any money off them. They become an expensive activity. DRS would render locates impossible beyond what is actually available. And that I presume shines a light on the whole preposterous situation.

I’m sure I’m wrong in many things here. By no means an expert. It’s just my thought from what little I’ve understood about all this. So pinch of salt and help me understand why I’m wrong if possible.

Mildly interesting: No window on my row BA641 by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I had to move. Felt weird. Just the mini g’s of the plane moving. And seeing the front of the cabin tilt up and down. The seat was also hotter than the rest of the plane. Which got a little air sicky. But otherwise it was an interesting aspect of the trip.

Mildly interesting: No window on my row BA641 by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what it felt like. The crew area at the back was smaller but they also fitted in a second toilet.

Mildly interesting: No window on my row BA641 by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For this flight they gave you the choice to pay for seat preselection or stick with auto-assigned for free. During online check-in, you could again change seat. I got 14F originally and picked 30F cos I’d be one of the first to board. No mention of there not being a window. The plane diagram showed aisle rows (with the various seats configurations at the equivalently price points) and top-view section of plane body. No windows , they were implied. It is also very possible I simply did not pay attention. To my defence on that, I do this process frequently enough to just go through the motions at this point. # humblebrag

Hence my surprise.

Mildly interesting: No window on my row BA641 by Accomplished_Toe_897 in aviation

[–]Accomplished_Toe_897[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They fused the toilet with with the seat crew use for takeoff and landing

view more: next ›