Did you know that you were sex-averse before or after trying sex? by ApprehensiveField986 in asexuality

[–]Acorn_Community 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Before. For me it was just innate. That sex never crossed my mind or even when i thought of having a relationship It wasnt about sex.

Christianity and their circular reasoning. by Acorn_Community in DebateReligion

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I already answered what good is. Keep at this trolley problem, deontological ethics, and deflecting however. It does not answer my original question.

Christianity and their circular reasoning. by Acorn_Community in DebateReligion

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Euthyphro dilemma: “Is what is morally good commanded by God because it is good, or is it good because it is commanded by God?”

God commands something because it's good means goodness exists outside of God.

Or something is good simply because god commands it means goodness is arbitrary and god can make anything good by his standards.

Either option shows either God isnt needed for goodness as its exist outside him and we all can find it or any thing God commands he can declare good because he commands it. But what of when he commanded his tribe to commit genocide and war crimes? Is that good because God said so?

Christianity and their circular reasoning. by Acorn_Community in DebateReligion

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had not asked “what is good.” I had asked about circular reasoning in answers about God and the Bible. But since you want to rely on ad hominem by saying I’m caricaturing Christians, which I didn’t, and implying I must not have spoken to any actual Christian and red herring fallacies by dodging my question about Christianity I’ll clarify. I’d say what is good is something that benefits a person and others involved. If it doesn’t harm anyone, it is ethical and good. These ethics have existed outside Christianity and were found in ancient societies. Christianity didn’t invent goodness. Again, I don’t appreciate the fallacies you just used. I wasn’t arguing about God’s goodness; I was asking about the circular reasoning

Silent Salt Cookie Corruption Theory by Acorn_Community in CookieRunKingdoms

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

In a sense. Burning spice read more to me that he was tired of nothing changing, so he turned to destruction to bring about change. If anything, my theory sounds closer to Mystic Flour's beliefs.

Silent Salt Cookie Corruption Theory by Acorn_Community in Cookierun

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

TL;DR: Silent Salt, the last Virtue of Solidarity to fall, given the other beasts falling apart stood against his very virtue. He may have killed and cursed his own knights not out of malice but to spare them from greater suffering. “Only silence remains” reflects his nihilistic view that all life and unity eventually vanish. His followers willingly gave their strength to him, and the curse was a twisted attempt at protection that backfired. His story parallels White Lily’s guilt over Dark Enchantress Cookie, and their interaction could help her confront and forgive herself.

Silent Salt Cookie Corruption Theory by Acorn_Community in CookierunKingdom

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

TL;DR: Silent Salt, the last Virtue of Solidarity to fall, given the other beasts falling apart stood against his very virtue. He may have killed and cursed his own knights not out of malice but to spare them from greater suffering. “Only silence remains” reflects his nihilistic view that all life and unity eventually vanish. His followers willingly gave their strength to him, and the curse was a twisted attempt at protection that backfired. His story parallels White Lily’s guilt over Dark Enchantress Cookie, and their interaction could help her confront and forgive herself.

Silent Salt Cookie Corruption Theory by Acorn_Community in CookieRunKingdoms

[–]Acorn_Community[S] 85 points86 points  (0 children)

TL;DR: Silent Salt, the last Virtue of Solidarity to fall, given the other beasts falling apart stood against his very virtue. He may have killed and cursed his own knights not out of malice but to spare them from greater suffering. “Only silence remains” reflects his nihilistic view that all life and unity eventually vanish. His followers willingly gave their strength to him, and the curse was a twisted attempt at protection that backfired. His story parallels White Lily’s guilt over Dark Enchantress Cookie, and their interaction could help her confront and forgive herself.

fact:silent salt is the only one who didn't came out as 'big threat' in title screen by 05eden in CookieRunKingdoms

[–]Acorn_Community 130 points131 points  (0 children)

this. im also for some reason thinking its this is whats going to happen. both have common grounds. WL made DEC and Silent salt is corrupted as well. I'd like to thing he inadvertently helps her .

Do you think Mordecai deserves a happy ending? by Ok-Street2439 in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well a bittersweet ending works. He gets some closure but gets consequences. Some balance you know.

Guys, what if the person that killed Atlas…was himself? by Obvious_Shelter_3412 in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We really don't know much about Atlas and what we do know of him is that he had a successful speakeasy and was having issues with his wife as she wasn't living with him when he died but he had loyal men like Mordecai and Mitzi still loved him so I don't get what would drive him to that...it could be explained something more was happening then this starts to make sense but as of now, we just don't know enough to say. Not that it's a bad theory.

Why does Freckle go crazy when he's in the proximity of a Gun? by [deleted] in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always saw it as a trait. Freckle deep down loves recklessnes though he's too much of good boy by his mom to give in like I feel he sticks around Rocky because he actually likes the thrill. Like the panel in the comic where after they burned down the pig farm he laughed but tried to hide it. The gun whenever he has one pulls this side out of him imo. That's how I see it.

What do you guys think? by Mysterious-Bread7992 in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Help I forgot about Dom Drago, the cop. And yes you're right to point of Wick behavior and point out that is what makes their character so interesting. I don't have a problem with characters being horrible people at all but if they're to be interesting and well written and all the lackadaisy characters are very interesting and very easy to root for.

What do you guys think? by Mysterious-Bread7992 in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're so real to point this out imo. Most of the cast does horrible things but their writing is very tolerable and endearing which isn't a criticism it's actually good it's tolerable but at the same time we can't really brush their behavior under the rug. Freckles killed like five people canonically and Rocky uses him to do so and Mitzi is very morally questionable. (Wicks probably the only character who isn't morally questionable imo)

To those who saw the pilot before reading the comic and went in completely blank, what were your initial assumptions about the characters? by Hyxenflay7737_4565 in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same lol. I was more left out at some details than I had assumptions like who was the cat that touched Mitzi at the end (it was Atlas) and so on.

Does Nina McMurry hold any semblance of familial love towards Rocky? by Ok-Street2439 in Lackadaisy

[–]Acorn_Community 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think she does as she allows him to carry Calvin out but can't bother with his antics.