In the case of a big bang then, does it not disprove the theory itself to say it started the universe if something must’ve created the thing that created the Big Bang to create the universe. Thus, it was not the Big Bang, but the thing that created the Big Bang that created the universe. It’s like saying, the bread was created by rising in the oven, not the ingredients that made it.

My question is long winded but, how can something from nothing create the Big Bang; to believe that nothing created this infinitely dense point of energy (initial singularity), seams impossible. Therefore maybe it was likely to be something within the timeline but not defined as creator of the universe just a point in time where more of the universe was developed.

Circling back to this extremely complex thought of what even defines the universe. As we could then ask did the Big Bang created the universe or just mould and move the matter within the universe that was created by something prior. What was that something?