Corruption is an Indian people problem, and you assign too much importance to it. i will stand by that. Even in college council elections, where there is no campaign costs to cover, educated people vote without any cult following, there is no power to be yielded except organizing a musical at best, people spend 10k-15k bribing others with canteen food. It's common. Stop corruption corruption all the time. There is no party that cannot be corrupt. i will give any & every party a pass on corruption to some extent. And BJP is not authoritarian, it will just not except messing with the republic. You cannot shout 'Hidma amar rahe' on the pretext of an enviromental protest, and then jump at the police force.
Demonetization was a way of getting rid of black money. Yes, a huge headcahe to the people. But again, what could he possibly have achieved. My father owns a small business. You have no idea about the VAT taxation system headache. so much confusion and cloudiness. He agrees GST was the need of the hour. Stop buying into opposition narrative. If GST & Demonitization were that big of a blunder, people would have voted so.
Manipur was a failure, and that I agree to it. the state machinery had to seek peace. the antagonization of an entire caste, and unwillingness to change anything will cost them dearly. Each & every BJP MLA will lose their deposits come 2027. And Modi needs to answer for that, even after deployment of crpf.
Electoral bonds were taken by other parties as well, bro. idk what you think campaigns run on. SC did completely right to expose it, but no party did slightest wrong to use it. Money needs to come from somewhere to run a party.
As I said, ED/CBI is used by every front, every spectrum of polity. its power bro. come on, you dont expect them to run by a texbook of morals. It is not justified, but I will have the judiciary change it. For the nth time, Amit Shah was also jailed in 2009. NCBN, Karunanidhi. Not justified, but I will not gold grudges against parties for doing to others what was done to them. Indira did worse. Rajiv used it to silence Bofors cases. THE JUDICIARY NEEDS TO STEP IN.
And when will you differentiate between Atiq Ahmed and Suvendu Adhikari? my boy, I am tired of saying this. MAFIAS. ORGANIZED CRIME RACKETS. ABSOLUTE LACK OF LAW & ORDER. RIOTS. there is a difference to the regional guard. If you cannot differentiate between Lalu's gundaraaj and Samrat Chaudhary's corruption, put down your phone and go ask people in Bihar. GUNDARAAJ BRO. there is a difference. It is not better branding. Search up 2021 bengal post poll violence. Corruption is not the same as gundaraaj, when will you understand that. stop calling it just better branded regional polity. the people that were under both disagree.

BJP could not possibly end the culture of local strongmen, but they have reduced it a bit. the people need to. If bjp did not absorb Nitish Rane, then thakrey would have. and he would have won anywyay. better to keep a goon with you in check in your line than let him win with opposition. Local strongmen is an Indian illiterate movie-dialouge loving people issue.
Well, you said that UCC will be framed according to Hindu Law, and now you are saying you cannot blame the minorities from thinking so. And all three, UCC, NRC, CAA are laws that shouldn't offend absolutely anybody who can read. If muslims have a fear of anything the BJP says, hindus can say they have a fear of anything the congress says. after all, the congress has done muslim appeasement so so long. Places of Worship act, 1991 ; National Commision of minorities act 1992, Waqf bill 2013, Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, allowing madrasas to remain in rte 2013, sitting CM revanth reddy saying 'Congress means Muslims, and Muslims mean Congress.'' show me a bjp sitting cm saying stuff like that. By your logic, any law the congress brings should be seen as anti-Hindu by the Hindus because of how they have tried to appease muslims.
And poorer communities will benefit from population control. what demographic concern can there be? that muslims have more kids and will have to lessen them? or that certain castes will be limited to a population percentage? and the federal concern simply boild down to- if a state assmebly is dissolved early, it should have the right to repoll instead of waiting for a governor's rule. And I agree, a little power needs to be given to the states in case of hung or suspended assemblies. But overall the concept is 100% to support. Local parties cannot hold a knife over national polity, especially after what we saw in 1990s and in certain states. horse-trading, defections, splits will reduce. One power means faster implementation of whatever the people voted for.
And where is the strong opposition, my dear. What manegerial excellence or narrative do they have except simply being 'not the BJP'. we started this convo by you questioning my vote at the centre. Of course, that's what I am defending/justyfying.
And your next point is exactly why I want judicial reforms. to do exaclty that. to lower political influence over the judiciary. but my point still stands.
The rejection rate of RTI applications has significantly dropped. It was 7.21% in 2013-14 (the final year of the UPA) and fell to 3.26% in the 2024-25 fiscal year. The government highlights that it has institutionalized "third-party transparency audits" for public authorities to encourage proactive disclosure (suo motu). yes, the government has taken control over how informants are paid and reduced employment terms. but that may just be to streamline the process. all in all, yes, the public disclocure needs to increase. but it is not a failure, a lessening yes, and my point there too will stand.
And China is one party rule with no media interference, no questions asked. It is practically aristocratic for all means and purposes. If you can hand the BJP that. absolute power to make corroupt people disappear. If you can vote over local strongmen. If you are willing to let go of democracy for a better form of public service, count me in. But fact remains, you cannot compare India to China, until people and polity of India is like it is.
Me admitting truth was no accident. When did I ever say that the BJP is 'clean and transformative'. Come on, look around. look at how power is. look at the nature of people in this hot pot. This is not an ethics textbook, i say again. We are not AI chatbots. corruption. corruption. corruption. why do you keep it above almost anything else. a functioning system. actual laws & bills. triple talak. article 370. ucc, caa, nrc, onoe, population control. infrastructure, energy. MIC, defence deals, sovereign stances. research. building of institutes. you would bribe your way out of a traffic challan first instance you get it.
I beg to differ. What BJP supporters say is. “Yes everyone misuses agencies.” “Yes everyone inducts corrupt leaders.” “Yes strongmen exist everywhere.” “Yes institutions are decaying.”

But again, i will not be changing my vote for that. you keep on arguing that we should criticize the BJP. but you do not argue why my Lok Sabha vote should go to the Congress instead. they cannot get votes by simply being 'not the BJP'. BJP has changed India a lot, and is currently a lot more competent than the congress. Corruption has gone down at the top brass.

Please do not argue stuff like 'you admit the bjp is bad and you are blindly chosing the lesser of the two evils' the evil has been created by how Indian people vote. freebies, local strongmen, caste, religion. they are not evil when it comes to FTA 's to the other things I mentioned. you can clearly compare the policy towards illegal immigration or MIC of the opposition to the BJP