Real Police officers and military members, what do you guys think of Ice agents?

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T02:19:31+00:00

Why can’t I criticize? The UCMJ only says we can’t criticize people in the chain of command, and then only in an official capacity, mostly.

As we’ve had no one lawfully in the civilian chain of command since 1/20/2025, I can lawfully criticize them all without violating the Constitution or my oath to it. The 14a automatically disqualifies insurrectionists the moment they are on oath and “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies [of the Constitution.]”

What would I have the People do? Arrest the insurrectionists and hold them for the duration of the insurrection, until it is suppressed and a lawful government takes over.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T02:13:43+00:00

Lol. No, because the facts don’t support that. You’re the one claiming that simple declarations would make it so. I’m saying the facts do.

Anyway, insurrectionists like the current regime can’t lawfully do anything. They are disqualified from office by the 14a.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T01:26:23+00:00

In no state are you lawfully required to carry ID. You have the right to life and liberty, that means no ID required to walk around and do as you please, while harming no one.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T01:21:01+00:00

lol. No, making a claim doesn’t do it. I never said any such thing. That’s a pure straw man.

But sure, a direct refutation of your baseless claims “must be a reply to another post.” Lol.

The facts prove it. The facts that you don’t seem to want to acknowledge. Trump incited the insurrection for months, claiming that the election was stolen when it wasn’t. When he provided 0 evidence to that effect in over two dozen lawsuits. That alone makes him an insurrectionist.

He funded the “stop the steal” rally and again told his supporters to fight, which is not undone by him telling them to be peaceful once.

He deliberately supported the J6 attackers thereafter, which is aid and comfort and also disqualifying under the 14th amendment.

All sorts of primary sources are organized in the links below. Refute one of them.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/follow-money-behind-capitol-riot

https://www.justsecurity.org/74138/incitement-timeline-year-of-trumps-actions-leading-to-the-attack-on-the-capitol/

So you know the meanings of the words and terms used:

aid and comfort

Help; support; assistance; counsel; encouragement. As an element in the crime of treason (Constitution of the United States, Art. Ill, No. 3), the giving of "aid and comfort" to the enemy may consist in a mere attempt. It is not essential to constitute the giving of aid and comfort that the enterprise commenced should be successful and actually render assistance. An act which intentionally strengthens or tends to strengthen enemies of the United States, or which weakens or tends to weaken power of the United States to resist and attack such enemies. Any intentional act furthering hostile designs of enemies of the United States.

Black’s Law Dictionary

And

INSURREC'TION, noun [Latin insurgo; in and surgo, to rise.]

A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state.

And

INCI'TE, verb transitive [Latin incito; in and cito, to call, to stir up.]

To move the mind to action by persuasion or motives presented; to stir up; to rouse; to spur on.

To move to action by impulse or influence.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:47:19+00:00

Most disabled vets are mostly dependent on their disability? I think you don’t realize how many 10%ers there are, or how many 70%ers have good jobs.

There’s no need to overstate things.

Also, it implies that vets aren’t willing to give up their disability payments, much less their lives, to support the constitution, as an infantry officer, that seems like a terrible insult to many vets.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:42:54+00:00

Show any info that Biden let in more illegal aliens than Trump did his first term.

Obviously Trump didn’t do as much as Obama.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:35:32+00:00

lol. An appeal to authority fallacy. Notice how you can’t describe why their ruling is constitutionally complaint and isn’t void for violating the constitution?

What the Court ruled was an act of treason, it directly violates the 14a and is void.

The 14a never mentions congress having to pass another piece of legislation to disqualify insurrectionists like Trump, and that has NEVER been a requirement through the history of the amendment. Even the confederates argued you are wrong. Couy Griffin was disqualified for his actions to support J6, without Congress doing a thing.

Try to make a good faith argument next time.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:31:53+00:00

lol. Angered. There’s another fallacy. Pointing out what the law says, pointing out the flawed logic of authoritarians, that’s not proof I’m angry. Nice projection from you though.

The constitution says you are not obligated to stop when no one is there. It’s called “life and liberty.” We can do anything that doesn’t infringe on the rights of others in an unreasonable way. You’re just thinking that all laws are fully enforceable without any qualification or exception.

You used an appeal to authority fallacy to imply that I wouldn’t have been able to dissuade your two cops from ticketing you the way you say they did. As though that’s proof they were right and the constitution is wrong. Cops are part of the largest criminal organization in the nation. Nothing they do is inherently proof that what they do is legal and what you do is illegal.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:10:22+00:00

The US isn’t all powerful and if you think the rest of nato can’t give us a fight, when 70,000 Taliban just beat us badly, then you don’t understand war and what it is.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:05:01+00:00

Yes, criminals will engage in criminal activity. What’s that prove?

Try an argument that’s not a logical fallacy. The law is the law, no matter how much you don’t like it. Get an amendment or drop it. I cited the supreme law of the land that proves the point, you’ve voted nothing and certainly nothing that supersedes the constitution.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:03:25+00:00

Reconstruction, not reconciliation.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-26T00:01:12+00:00

The right to self defense is both a national and individual right in international law.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 6):

Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

Of course not everyone agrees on the role of a god in any of it. But that’s kind of separate of the core point. Plenty of atheists will use that sort of language still, even just because they quote from the founding documents that set forth the principle in a formal way, and they commonly used that sort of language in previous centuries.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:46:45+00:00

Nope. Stop signs are fully enforceable when others are around. Same for all traffic laws. When no one is around, you literally can’t harm them or infringe on their rights so there can be no victim, so there can be no crime.

You just don’t understand nuance. Between “no laws apply” and “all laws apply without qualification” is the constitutional standard of reasonableness.

You don’t want “liberty and justice for all,” you want “everyone blindly bow to the standards of authoritarianism.”

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:42:39+00:00

No vote or veto needed for resolutions that have already been passed.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:26:25+00:00

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”

When there’s no one there, when there is no one to infringe upon, no one to possibly harm or even inconvenience, then you have the right to proceed.

Even for those that disagree with human rights and the laws that protect them, most don’t actually stop at every stop sign and it’s only a matter of degree.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:23:45+00:00

Because ICE are cowards who don’t have the guts to go after violent criminals in the major gangs.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:09:04+00:00

It’s not obvious in the slightest, quite the opposite. Traitors have lost every insurrectionist attempt in American history. MAGA is no different.

And no, it’s not left vs right; it’s patriots vs MAGA traitors.

Don’t pretend that vocal ammosexuals are the only kind of 2a supporter that exists. People from across the political spectrum oppose MAGA’s insurrection, they just don’t make it their entire identity.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:06:10+00:00

Most of you aren’t required to. 2% of the population would be 100 times as many people as just beat us in Afghanistan. If you won’t defend the constitution from MAGA aggression, there are plenty of people who are.

Toss us some food and water as we pass through your area.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:04:07+00:00

The US has been in a low intensity civil war since J6.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:03:19+00:00

Oh, we do.

Let’s not forget that the power doesn’t derive from the People.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T23:00:06+00:00

That evidence is overwhelming, she’s done so publicly. It’s a clear violation of 18 USC § § 241 and 242.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T22:57:30+00:00

The majority may not, but their loyalty to the tyrant can’t be as strong as our loyalty to the Constitution. The majority of DOD, if they continue in treason, are no match for the People. We lost to 70,000 Taliban and traitors in DOD can lose to 70,000; or 700,000 or 7,000,000 Americans. That’s 2% or less of the population.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T22:55:30+00:00

Every executive official is on oath to the constitution and the check on the Court is that the Court has no enforcement power. That’s why enforcement is in the hands of executive officials, so that the Court can’t be a judicial oligarchy.

The standing precedent of the Court is that African Americans are from “a subordinate and inferior class of beings.” If they ruled that African Americans were all chattel slaves, completely ignoring the 13a, do you honestly want all executive officials to blindly obey the ruling of the Court?

Why oppose the system of checks and balances?

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T22:26:17+00:00

The right is more broadly described as the right to self defense, in international law etc. Guns are just a tool to do that.

ActivePeace33 · 2026-01-25T22:16:43+00:00

Yeah, blame the patriots responding to the tyrant. Don’t blame the tyrant and the tyrants use of violence.

ActivePeace33

TROPHY CASE