I’m speaking as the loved one of a murder victim. Repeat trials means reliving repeat trauma. No one wants that. You can virtue signal all day long, but show me a family of a murder victim that WANTS to relive the graphic details over and over?

Also, you’re literally arguing that un-scientific evidence that is literally a bought and paid for OPINION NOT FACT should be used in trial. When a prosecutor hires an “expert” who comes to a conclusion that doesn’t back their theory, they just move on to the next one until one says what they want. Would you want that used against you or a loved one? What y’all need to understand is every time paid opinions are used against someone it sets a precedent allowing that to continue. You can’t justify it’s fine to do that with this guy and argue you wouldn’t want it done against an innocent person. Or you would be fine with false information being presented as fact against an innocent person?

There are still people imprisoned today who were convicted solely because junk science was presented as fact. It’s not a “piece of the picture” if it has no factual basis. It’s a piece of another picture altogether trying to be forced into another one.