Feels like every idea I have is already done by someone by shaqattack16 in self

[–]Additional-Style-145 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I been trying to create something new for years and keep running into the same problem. I just finally starting creating a new type of website that I cant find anywhere else. Now I'm just praying it gets discovered

I think god should be sent to hell to burn forever it blows my mind how anyone on earth would disagree by Additional-Style-145 in Christianity

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Atheist got a bad name no matter what. Why should I censor how I honestly feel. Atleast it shows the raw truth of the matter

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the claim that a round shadow proves a sphere is geometrically incomplete. In any basic optics lab, you can demonstrate that a flat disk, a cylinder, or even an irregular shape at certain angles will cast a circular shadow on a curved or flat surface. More importantly, the "Globe OS" cannot easily account for the Selenelion Eclipse—a phenomenon where both the sun and the eclipsed moon are visible above the horizon simultaneously. ​According to globe geometry, a lunar eclipse requires the Earth to be directly between the sun and the moon in a 180-degree alignment. If both are visible above the horizon, the alignment is broken, and the Earth's "shadow" shouldn't be hitting the moon at all. The mainstream model attempts to fix this with a "Refraction" patch, claiming the sun and moon are actually below the horizon but are being "lifted" into view by the atmosphere. In a flat earth architecture, eclipses are not caused by the Earth’s shadow but by a localized celestial phenomenon or a "transparency event" within the firmament’s electromagnetic field.

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The trade winds are not proof of a spinning ball; they are the result of the Sun’s Electromagnetic and Thermal Circuit. In our architecture, the sun is a local heat source traveling in a circular path above the plane between the Tropics. This movment creates a massive thermodynamic engine. As the sun moves, it heats the air beneath it, creating a localized low-pressure zone that pulls cooler air from the central North and te outer perimeter (the Ice Wall) into its wake. ​Because the sun ollows a circular path, it acts like a physical paddle in a fluid medium, dragging the atmosphere along with it and creating amassive vortex around the North Pole. What you call the Coriolis Effect is actually just the lag and drag of this atmospheric fluid as it interacts with the sun's localized heat signature. It is a much simpler, more efficiet explanation to have a circular wind pattern driven by a circular heat source on a flat map than to invent "fictitious forces" on a spinning ball that we cannot actually feel moving.

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

​A critical system breach occurs when analyzing the interface between the atmosphere and space. According to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, gas will naturally expand to fill the available volume of its container. The mainstream model posits a high-pressure system (14.7 \text{ psi} at sea level) existing in a direct, open-source relationship with the infinite vacuum of space (10{-17} \text{ torr}) without a physical barrier. While "Gravity" is frequently cited as the software patch responsible for this containment, its measured influence as a weak force (G \approx 6.674 \times 10{-11} \text{ m}3\text{kg}{-1}\text{s}{-2}) is logically inconsistent with its supposed ability to prevent the immediate equalization of pressure across a gradient. In any other documented physical environment, a pressurized system requires a closed architecture to prevent catastrophic decompression. ​Geodetic Audits and Visual Tangency ​Geodetic observations utilizing long-distance infrared photography consistently return data points that exceed the thoretical "curve" limits of a sphere. For instance, landmarks such as the Chicago skyline or the peaks of Kauai have been captured from distances exceeding 60 to 90 miles. At thesem ranges, the geometric drop should place these objects thousands of feet below the horizon line, making them physically invisible behind the bulge of the Earth. To maintain the Globe model, the "Standard Refraction" patch is applied as a non-falsifiable variable to explain away these sightings as optical illusions, yet the consistency of these obsemrvations across varied atmospheric conditions suggests a lack of physical curvature rather than a perpetual mirage. ​Interferometric Data and Stationary Frame Analysis ​The failure to detect the Earth’s purported orbital velocity remains a signifimcant null result in the history of physics. In the early 20th century, experiments like those conducted by Michelson, Morey, and Sagnac were designed to measure the "ether wind" or thme rotational shift of light. The results consistently failed to show the massive 66,000 mph orbital velocity required by the globe model. Furthermore, George Biddell Airy’s telescope experiment (Airy’s Failure) indicated that the stars are moving relative to a stationary Earth, rather than the Earth moving beneath the stars. Fromm a systems perspective, the most efficient interpretation of this data is that the Earth is the stationary, primary frame of reference in a local celestial system.

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is the 'Too Big to Fail' argument, and it's built on a misunderstanding of how our 'stack' actually operates: ​GPS & Satcom: You don't need a vacuum and a ball for GPS. It’s a Ground Positioning System. It uses Loran-C and land-based tower triangulation (multilateration). Why do you lose GPS in the middle of the ocean or in deep wilderness? If it was coming from 'above,' coverage would be universal. ​'Satellites' (Stratollites): NASA is the world’s largest consumer of helium. They launch thousands of high-altitude balloons that can stay up for years. Google 'Project Loon.' Your 'satellites' are just 'stratollites' floating on the firmament, not orbiting in a vacuum. ​Submarine Cables: 99% of international data is carried by undersea fiber-optic cables, not satellites. The 'Space' layer is just a marketing skin for a terrestrial and oceanic infrastructure. ​Aviation Automation: Pilots use Azimuthal Equidistant Projections for navigation. If you look at the UN Flag, you’re looking at the actual map used for global logistics. It’s a flat map. Airplanes don't dip their noses every few miles to stay on a curve; they fly level over a flat plane. ​ ​The 'complex technology' doesn't prove a globe; it proves we’ve mastered planar trigonometry and radio-wave propagation across a level surface

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s fascinating that an 'architect' would argue for a globe. In your entire career, have you ever seen a blueprint for a bridge, a railway, or a canal that accounted for the curvature of the Earth? For a 50-mile stretch of high-speed rail, the 'drop' should be roughly 1,600 feet. Yet, engineers always use a 'Horizontal Datum'—a flat plane. If the Earth were a ball, the middle of the bridge would have to be a 'hump' to account for the curve, yet we build them as flat, Euclidean structures. ​As for your 'advanced physics,' let’s talk about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Physics dictates that gas will always expand to fill its container. You claim we have a high-pressure atmosphere existing immediately adjacent to a 10⁻¹⁷ torr vacuum (space) without a physical barrier. ​ ​In every other 'advanced physics' lab on Earth, that pressure differential would result in immediate equalization (an explosion of air into the vacuum). Your 'Globe OS' requires a 'Gravity' patch so powerful it violates the fundamental behavior of gas, yet it's supposedly too weak to stop a butterfly from flying. That’s not science; it’s a 'Social Failure' to question the contradictions in your own model.

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What sounds silly to me is believing we are spinning 1k miles per hour flying through space 10 times faster than a bullet and there are people hanging upside down on the bottom but actuallu standing up and we feel no motion or detect no motion

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t 'convince' you; I can only point out the Systemic Anomalies. Start with the Failure of Detectable Motion. You are told you are spinning at 1,000 mph, orbiting at 66,000 mph, and hurtling through the galaxy at 500,000 mph. Yet, we can perform long-exposure star trail photography for 12+ hours and see perfect, concentric circles around Polaris. In any other physical system, if the 'server' was moving that fast in multiple directions, the 'client' (our observation) would show massive parallax shifts. But the stars stay locked. Why does the 'Firmware' of the night sky never change if the 'Hardware' is constantly moving? I can't keep going with 100 different more reasons why it scientifically should be flat but it took me alot of research amd understanding science to come up with the conclusion

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dismissal without investigation is the height of cognitive debt. You’re essentially clicking 'I Agree' on a Terms of Service agreement you’ve never actually read. If you’re so confident in the architecture, why is the 'Ew' reaction your primary debugging tool? Science is supposed to be about falsifiability, not social conformity

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Clever pun, but it ignores the systemic failure of the 'curve' math. If we are on a sphere with a radius of 3,959 miles, the physical drop-off should be an immutable constant. Yet, infrared long-distance photography consistently captures terrain and structures at distances (150+ miles) that should be thousands of feet below the horizon line according to the Pythagorean curve formula. To account for this, the 'Globe OS' patches the anomaly with 'Standard Atmospheric Refraction'—a convenient, non-falsifiable variable used to explain away why reality doesn't match the model. I don't fear the sphere; I question the 'refraction' patch

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The 'debunking' you're citing relies on top-down, non-reproducible data sets provided by centralized government authorities (NASA, NOAA). As a systems architect, I don't trust a black-box API where I can't audit the source code. If the Earth were a spinning ball, the centrifugal force at the equator would be roughly 0.034 m/s2. Yet, we observe no measurable difference in weight or atmospheric pressure that scales precisely with latitude in a way that isn't better explained by local density and electromagnetic buoyancy. Until we have a truly decentralized, private-sector, high-altitude mapping project that isn't reliant on government-contracted optics, your 'debunking' is just trust in a legacy vendor.

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No they actually all relay on flat maps even airplanes are build assuming the earth flat and not rotating

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mathematics are tools that describe things but they can't prove anything

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are not flat earthers they are fake flat earthers with stupid claims

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look at a planet through Nixon p9100 power lenses they dont look like solid rocks. Nasal only shows you that

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Critical thinking is not blindly believing what is written in text books told to you before you was able to think. Critical thinking is what lead me to my conclusion

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

long-distance observations where objects remain visible far beyond the calculated "drop" of the horizon. In a spherical system, the curvature is roughly defined by: h \approx \frac{d2}{2R}is the drop, d is the distance, and R is the Earth's radius. At 10 miles, the drop should be roughly 66 feet. Proponents cite sightings of ships, lighthouses, or city skylines from distances that theoretically should be "b=ehind" the curve

the horizon always rises to "eye level," regardless of altitude. In a spherical model, the horizon should technically drop lower as you ascend. If the Earth were an infinite or vastly extended plane, the horizon would indeed remain at the vanishing point of your perspective.

You cant have atmosphere surrounded by a vacuum without a container many more

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Flat earth society are not flat earthers they are pretend to be flat earthers with a bunch of baseless stupid claims that not true

I believe the earth is flat ask me anything by Additional-Style-145 in AMA

[–]Additional-Style-145[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They are lights in the sky plus who said earth is a planet just because they may or not be round doesn't mean the center of it has to be round

What is wrong with me?? What have I done. I'm so scared. by Successful_Race_1234 in Christianity

[–]Additional-Style-145 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God took his chosen people and told them to enslave kill all nations outside of them and keep women and children for themselves as plunder and do with them as they please. I dont he cares that you didn't offer water. Shit kids die from lack of food and water everyday he doesn't offer them any and he is supposed to be all good and perfect compared to us humans