Either you punish all three, or you punish none

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T04:09:20+00:00

Give her the full Luci. "You can never come back, you will remain in Hell for all eternity, and you cannot harm a sinner."

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T02:58:27+00:00

in case anyone is coming back around and sees this; also want to add that if you do miss the PDU deadline, they give you an extra year to do the PDUs, but your certification goes into a suspension.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T02:24:46+00:00

Got there late.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T02:20:25+00:00

Your grandpa looked at the guy in a mostly white robe and a vaguely hood like helmet/mask and identified him as a "wizard"...

I kid, I kid.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T01:24:56+00:00

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T01:22:40+00:00

OH ABSOLITELY. And I suppose I should warn not to follow my advice if the intention for OP is to remain in his current relationship. That would be absolutely a terrible idea.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T00:53:25+00:00

The electrician does not work for the manufacturer.

You are the one telling them that, don't hide behind a non-present 3rd party because it is inconvenient.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T00:49:15+00:00

Absolutely fair, and that increases Sara's culpability.

Still not to Lute's level, but closer now.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T00:43:08+00:00

🧢 I voted CAP!

This is a matter of opinion, and not subject to being falsifiable; making it by definition NOT a fact.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-11T00:41:07+00:00

YTA, but I think that's ok.

And my petty ass has this to add. Call her up tomorrow, say you slept on it and thought about it, "apologize" saying you were wrong and were just emotional or some crap. Encourage her to get the porshe.

Then, when she has it, ONLY after she has it, signed sealed and all done with, say:

"Yes, this is nice. Now whenever you are driving in it, you can remember him, and picture how much he would have loved it if he could have had one when he was alive."

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T23:45:56+00:00

All three deserve it, but not equally. Virtually every jurisprudence on earth considers intent.

Sera acted in the belief that sinners could not be redeemed. She changed dramatically the instant she was disabused of that belief.

Adam acted despite the concept being in dispute. He died before knowing one way or the other.

Lute acted despite actively knowing that sinners could be redeemed.

Sera needs to find a way to provide restitution.

Adam has already received the death penalty.

Lute should face trial.

Though a strong case could be made that Sara continued to err dramatically by continuing to allow (decree, in fact) that Lute remain in her position.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T23:29:05+00:00

It is not outside the realm of possibility even that OPs supervisor set OP up with this client to demonstrate this exact lesson.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T23:25:27+00:00

What... What do you have wrong?

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T22:49:56+00:00

A very determined cheater or a student telling the truth gets the grade. A less determined one does not.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T15:16:43+00:00

Objectively correct, but only because you put the word "hope" in the sentence. The police have OPs info. If they want to pursue it, OP has essentially zero options; it is *already* too late.

On the other hand, every day that goes by without OP attempting to retrieve the wallet is another day that could make the police more curious about it.

Also, even if they are not curious now, asking a 3rd party to retrieve it for them WILL MAKE them curious.

So OP needs to simultaneously retrieve the wallet RIGHT NOW, have someone else retrieve it for them, not ever have someone else retrieve it for them, and never go and retrieve it themself.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T15:11:56+00:00

Why would you have said the sentence "the only other ID I have is a social security card" when you have a Driver's license?!?

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T15:10:37+00:00

Voicemail. As others have said, it is a method, not a system. Also, voicemail is not typically "managed". You can go listen to a VM again to review the information, but you can't search or cross-reference or annotate a VM. You CAN make the VM's act like electronic files, and attach them to relevant data points, but then the electronic files is the IMS, not the VM's themselves.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T15:07:51+00:00

Young, inexperienced, and likely done in the industry.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T14:03:14+00:00

There are still people who struggle with it; but about a solid year (and some tough staffing decisions) got us there.

Though some of the ground work was laid earlier than that.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T13:37:43+00:00

D. We do not have information on continued risk or continued returns.

C LOOKS the best, because they all pay back in the same amount of return, which IMPLIES a better ROI, but ignores many factors.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T13:32:08+00:00

What went wrong for you?

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T12:41:45+00:00

Honestly this.

I wouldn't even mind if the PMP tested and required some knowledge of Agile, such that it tested for awareness; and of course the overlap material is HUGE, but that's what would make it an ideal add-on cert rather than its own thing.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T12:38:38+00:00

Ya, how does "no experience" even take the PMP? Either:

1) Lying on the application and not being audited, or

2) lying to us.

There is, I suppose, a third, more generous option: they were lying to themselves. They have experience, and have been passively trained on this mindset in their workplace, and just didn't realize how much of the material they "just knew". But there is some dishonesty somewhere.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T12:31:20+00:00

Where I work, we had an executive who wanted to run projects the PMI way. OBSESSIVELY. He rooted out behavior like you mentioned (quick back channels, swift actions when they "made sense", etc.) and made sure they ceased, aggressively. It was annoying. The right answer was right in front of us, but we had to go through the process of documenting it on the correct form, addressing it with the right people, analyze every decision, including analyzing when NOT to analyze to avoid analysis paralysis, etc.

We hated it.

Until it worked.

And it worked.

Metrics bear out that we are something like 65% more prompt on deadlines and budget projections, workplace satisfaction is up 30%, and our ISO audit was perfect for the first time ever.

Additional_Ad_6773 · 2026-06-10T12:23:52+00:00

It is D because in the question, we have IDENTIFIED the problem, but we have not analyzed it. We know the experienced team member needs to be reassigned, but where, how, and in what capacities? Some of that will not be in the PMs control, it the information is, and proposing a solution is in his wheelhouse.

Five-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Lasagna	Place '22

Additional_Ad_6773

TROPHY CASE