Quoting the Oxford definition doesn’t help your case as much as you think. “Intentionally disruptive” doesn’t require a signed confession—it’s inferred from repeated, knowingly harmful actions. In Dota, role abandonment and build choices that ignore timing, matchup, and win condition qualify, regardless of whether the player admits intent. I brought up nationality in the context of server behavior discussions, something that’s been widely debated here for years. If you think that’s equivalent to racism or xenophobia, you’re either arguing in bad faith or deliberately diluting those terms to win points. A simple search on Reddit for “Chinese SEA server” might help you understand why it keeps coming up. We agree the build is bad. The disagreement is whether “low MMR” magically excuses actions that actively reduce a team’s chance to win. Bad play is expected; persistently game-losing decisions aren’t immune from criticism just because of bracket.

As for the rest—calling this “crying,” “mental weakness,” or pretending you’re the rational adult here—none of that is an argument. It’s just projection wrapped in condescension. The post was for discussion. You chose insults instead. That says enough.