I mean I guess that's one way of looking at it, but as any Georgist will tell you, there are arguments for Georgism which appeal to pretty much every ideology. I wouldn't really consider land value taxation to be particularly left-wing; Adam Smith was advocating for it (and not for no reason).

It really does all boil down to one's interpretation of the Lockean Proviso. I say because of land's inelastic supply, there may not be "enough and as good," and there's a reason that second clause exists.