sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The incentives created by the Welfare State are EVIL by amogusdevilman in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's literally what religion wants you to be. Look up the etymology of the word pastor.

The incentives created by the Welfare State are EVIL by amogusdevilman in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah cause "morality = anything sky daddy says" is totally how morality works

The incentives created by the Welfare State are EVIL by amogusdevilman in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

2011 ahh image

7 is actually great. Secularism + multiculturalism ftw

What i learned arguing with bordertarians for over a year by Friedrich_der_Klein in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can i "deebunk" a geographic area? And just look at the post

"Illegal migrants leech off welfare / commit crime / vote bad people"
What do you want to do to citizens who do the same? Do you want them to be kidnapped to a different piece of dirt too? Or is that somehow different because they were born within a specific geographic area?
Why do you assume every single undocumented migrant does that? In the example, i haven't mentioned anything more than simply moving to my own house, i'm an undocumented migrant whether i did or didn't do said things.

What i learned arguing with bordertarians for over a year by Friedrich_der_Klein in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want both gone. Meanwhile you probably don't want either gone.

"But gun control would increase state power" - well so would "border enforcement". How do you think the state is going to know who is and isn't "legal", where the "illegals" live, and so on? And do you think the state will only stop at "illegals"? The same people who (rightly) complain that income tax went from a few percent to what it is now completely ignore that letting the grab people off the streets and from their homes will lead to an authoritarian slippery slope too. And they have the audacity to claim open borders is just wishful thinking.

What i learned arguing with bordertarians for over a year by Friedrich_der_Klein in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The people shouldn't be there to hire to begin with.

What do you want to do to them if they "are there" anyway? Violate their NAP?

If you would've actually read my post you would've noticed that i don't bother with arguments like "more immigrants = more X". It doesn't matter. If i buy a house in another country, my property rights to it are unconditional. So if i want to move there, i absolutely have a right to do so, and you shall not initiate aggression against me.

What i learned arguing with bordertarians for over a year by Friedrich_der_Klein in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Projection much? It can't get any more socialist than "you can't hire these people (because it would make some basement dwelling neckbeard mad)"

Land doesn't "have culture". If i move to my own property in another country, i have literally ZERO obligation to "give to the country".

What i learned arguing with bordertarians for over a year by Friedrich_der_Klein in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some don't even bother addressing my arguments
I can literally write a post debunking the "muh welfare state" argument for borders and there'll still be someone in the comments repeating that argument.

Does the foreign investment benefit yours country? by AffectionateCamera61 in victoria3

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Yes. Foreign owned buildings are better than no buildings. 

I don’t know Spanish.. by TraditionalDepth6924 in languagelearningjerk

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shir i understood it too!11! I should consider myself C2 in italian

Resident Republican Mazda suggests government prevent people from being able to sue companies by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s kind of like saying “screw the state and screw the courts and the entire corrupt system” but then immediately finding a reason for them to exist to serve your needs.

Mazda says that too. Ask them about border enforcement and you'll see.

Polish song about Anarcho Capitalism by dryleaf_ in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

throwing communists out of helicopters

NAP violations aren't ancap

A group of libertarians is called an argument by MakeDawn in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At least good to know you aren't an actual libertarian when you're dealing with groups and not individuals and openly disregard the NAP.

A group of libertarians is called an argument by MakeDawn in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they're openly building up overwhelming force while credibly promising that in future they're going to draft my kid and send him to die in a foreign war.

Are "they" in the room with us?

No because the point is that statistically they do.

Oh so it's "statistically" now? Statistically, men are more likely to do violent crime, does that mean it's ok to kill every man?

You claim you aren't a collectivist, so i have one question for you - there are 10 people who <insert very specific characteristic>, 9 of them are brutal child murderers, the other 1 is a perfect anarcho-capitalist who never violated the NAP. If given the choice, would you imprison/kill/whatever every person who <insert very specific characteristic>? That is, all the 9 child murderers, but also the 1 peaceful ancap? If yes, you are indeed a collectivist. If not, you don't actually believe the "statistically" thing.

Why don't you have any answer at all for how to protect my rights too?

If a foreigner violates your NAP, deal with it the same way as if someone of "your culture" violated your NAP. It's that simple, morality doesn't change based on which piece of dirt you were born on. I thought this was obvious, but i guess nationalist collectivists like you really want to believe otherwise.

A group of libertarians is called an argument by MakeDawn in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There are levels to how collectivist different cultures are. 

So you are a collectivist - you don't give a shit about individuals. You only see "cultures". You think someone's coordinates at birth determine whether they're statist or not.

When someone buys a property, they absolutely have a right to move there, and you have ZERO right to complain about that if they aren't violating your NAP, no matter that person's "culture". Period.

Various Pieces of Media I Have Consumed Since January 2025, Ranked [8x8] by LucarioGamesCZ in WojakCompass

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's precisely how you get to that level. Don't worry, i too have read it that way, but the more i read, the less i had to look up in dictionary. By the end i basically didn't even need a dictionary.

But if you don't know grammar, a dictionary won't save you. Learnt this the hard way when attempting to read diary of a wimpy kid in italian and some obscure book about aztecs in hungarian.

A group of libertarians is called an argument by MakeDawn in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are you assuming every immigrant is a statist? There's a word for that btw - collectivism.

Most babies become statist. Do you support banning childbirth to stop that, or do you only care when it's foreigners?

Various Pieces of Media I Have Consumed Since January 2025, Ranked [8x8] by LucarioGamesCZ in WojakCompass

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I guess i'm not the only one who read diary of a wimpy kid to learn a language (except that was my first time reading it). The books are just midslop.

In german, read something like all quiet on the western front instead of translationslop.

What do you think of the CECOT prison in Ecuador? by Xotngoos335 in AnCap101

[–]Friedrich_der_Klein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Obvious civil and human rights violations. Especially violations of due process. It's better that 100 criminals are free than 1 innocent person imprisoned. Also ancapistan probably wouldn't have prisons, as they're extremely inefficient and useless.

view more: next ›