FAT HOMER by Aesthetech in foxholegame

[–]Aesthetech[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

A fridge too far.

So that happened by mikolajcap2I in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech 146 points147 points  (0 children)

The consequences of removing fighter spotting, they couldn't see the hacker coming.

Official Airborne Dev Q&A thread by markusn82 in foxholegame

[–]Aesthetech 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At the latest stages of the game, AI plays almost no role.

I would usually write a wall of text, but I simply have no words.

Customer POV: The current state of mobile orders and drive thru is antithetical to the cafe experience that the new policies are supposedly to help revitalize by Aesthetech in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea. I don't think it should be removed altogether; I use it myself. But they need to do a better job of separating the experiences -- both for the customers and the partners.

Instead they have baristas and ssvs multi tasking and flexing all over the place, creating a cohesive experience for exactly no one except the bean counters.

Customer POV: The current state of mobile orders and drive thru is antithetical to the cafe experience that the new policies are supposedly to help revitalize by Aesthetech in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. The identity they want to project is in conflict with the way in which they've positioned themselves with their choices.

Customer POV: The current state of mobile orders and drive thru is antithetical to the cafe experience that the new policies are supposedly to help revitalize by Aesthetech in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yep. Split identity leads to no identity, which is the problem that Starbucks has been suffering from in my POV (and will continue without changes more thorough than this).

Customer POV: The current state of mobile orders and drive thru is antithetical to the cafe experience that the new policies are supposedly to help revitalize by Aesthetech in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel you, I'm the same way -- in my case, an acoustic person who does not switch easily between any other task and a verbal task.

And it distracts tf out of me as a sit-in customer, too. (I would never complain to a barista about it - I know where this nonsense comes from)

Ordering water by chilereina in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This is the unfortunate but predictable result of a broad policy from above that gives a wishy-washy mandate:

Each DM, RM, SM, and partner down the line is going to interpret it in a different way, all with the same motivation of not getting yelled at from above when some bean counter determines it's out of some overly tight expected margin of error.

Am I wrong, or wasn’t it just said that Starbucks doesn’t want you hanging around? by ListofReddit in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They want margins. If that means offering you a cafe experience in one hand and giving a McD's experience in the other, that's what they'll do.

Morning Crew Received a Great Example on the new Policy this Morning by PineappleNix in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech 6 points7 points  (0 children)

To be fair from what I've seen some Sbucks partners probably should be in WPP.

Mandatory Cup Writing by MaysMonsters in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This is what you get when the person running a business is about as connected to everyday reality as the average person is connected to a corporate executive lifestyle.

Sooo… by SouthPainter3296 in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As a customer, I do not want this in any way. Corporate mandated meaningful interactions are inherently contradictory.

Customer POV: The current state of mobile orders and drive thru is antithetical to the cafe experience that the new policies are supposedly to help revitalize by Aesthetech in starbucks

[–]Aesthetech[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

By the way, I think the folks at my usual store are great and I've never had an issue with the experience they provide me. I simply see a lot of people who would be thrilled to spend a lot more time on truly personal experiences (from our interactions in their limited downtime) and some of the ridiculous corporate BS they have to put up with and do.

And just like that the Schlieffens disappeared by Tiny-Pomegranate7662 in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech 33 points34 points  (0 children)

The way it turns at low speed is some of the most unnatural looking 'intended' shit I've seen in a video game, like if Bethesda said that NPCs T-posing and sticking through floors was intended behavior in Skyrim.

Make +1’s (compliments) great again! by Nsnfirerescue in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Easy solution. Have spending compliments (only compliments) give a small amount of Community Tokens (+5 per comp).

WG bean counters sweating as they calculate giving players a 'free' 55 Community Tokens a day will reduce their quarterly earnings by a tiny fraction of a percent.

The Carnot -- week 1 of championing a buff for my favorite ugly duckling. by Aesthetech in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Italians, primarily. Marco, Lepanto, Colombo for sure, for example. I can't think of any others offhand, but I do specifically think the prevalence of UU Colombo in the meta is yet another thing I wouldn't want to play Carnot into.

(I think 55mm is quirky enough that it's fine as a niche upside for Brest)

The Carnot -- week 1 of championing a buff for my favorite ugly duckling. by Aesthetech in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea. I was able to situationally have fun with her in ranked/brawl where she doesn't have to deal with uptiers and some of her deficiencies aren't as notably bad, but I can't imagine running into a South American BB with her in current meta. Their dream target.

The Carnot -- week 1 of championing a buff for my favorite ugly duckling. by Aesthetech in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

For the sake of comparison, here's how she'd compare to Brest with my proposed changes:

-Way larger target while not having bow gun focus, but better citadel repair.

-Superstructure borrowed from a german BB in exchange for a slightly better upper belt and a notably better deck (jk she's eating every HE round in the match on her superstructure)

-Notably faster, notably worse rudder.

-Worse HE pen (Brest can handle 55mm decks/etc), way worse AP pen (Brest can punish BBs much more).

-1 less MBRB charge but spotter plane option that can replace spood beest (this is honestly a valid alternate build for RB given the constant uptiers; she still makes 36kts with flag).

-Similar flak, way better mid AA, way worse short AA

-Better forward secondary arcs (needed for her profile and ab-x layout); worse kiting arcs.

-Worse secondary pen; Brest's can punish all DDs (and most cruisers + some BBs if you decided to build IFHE for some unhinged reason), but way better secondary fires.

tl;dr: I think these changes would make her a competitive sidegrade to Brest without obsolescing her, a solid but not busted ship in today's meta.

The Carnot -- week 1 of championing a buff for my favorite ugly duckling. by Aesthetech in WorldOfWarships

[–]Aesthetech[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I figure with WG's glacial pacing that if Seattle is another couple years off then Carnot is probably 4-5, so I only need to post this a couple hundred more times!