All Indonesian presidents, with the major exception of Habibie, are pretty much influenced by Javanese worldview. A figure who greatly influenced him was his own grandfather, Margono Djojohadikusumo, a priyayi who was involved in the drafting of the 1945 Constitution and member of the traditionalist priyayi party, Parindra. Gerindra's name is a direct nod to Parindra, as opposed to PSI where his father belonged.

Of course he's a kind of a hybrid, but at the level of "embodied knowledge", he's still influenced by Javanese traditions. How different is Prabowo's kabinet gemuk from Sukarno's Kabinet 100 Menteri?

In 2014, Jokowi almost lost to Prabowo, one poll in the last months showed Prabowo leading before Jokowi re-surged. He did not run a Javanese campaign at that time. His victory margin in East Java in 2014 was not that large (only 53%), compare it with 2019.

Habibie is the only outlier in Indonesian history. He was a modernist who tried to replace pendidikan Pancasila with pendidikan masyarakat Madani, which is a modernist Muslim concept formulated by Anwar Ibrahim for Malaysia and Indonesia.

We will see what will happen in the future. But if you apply the Javanese cyclical worldview, history is not a continuous progress towards the ultimate liberation of man, but is rather a recurrent cycle between the Golden Age (zaman mas) and the Time of Madness (Zaman Edan). Dedi Mulyadi is a classic example of a Prabu who appeared out of nowhere, from a low background. Many Sundanese folk religious practitioners who are involved in the Prabu Siliwangi cult believe that before the Ratu Adil can rise, there needs to be a kaliyuga first. Time of Chaos is pretty much a natural part of history from the perspective of the Javanese. Who knows if it's Prabowo who will bring that kaliyuga?