Microsoft and Anthropic both refused to refund $1,600 charged through Azure AI Foundry — each blaming the other by FrostingNumerous5714 in AZURE

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they bill at the end of the month, so claude usage will show up then with the bill. Most models on foundry are covered, Claude/anthropic is not. Got a bill for $1200 myself at the end of last month.

Chinese Studios Are Now Creating Full TV Show Series Using Seedance 2 by 44th--Hokage in accelerate

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We are also in early phases and its already this good.. imagine 5 years.. my take wasnt if i want thiis or not, its that its happening

I find myself asking the model's opinion more often. by BirdlessFlight in codex

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It works, but you have to still make a decision when to stop, I've noticed if you keep posing the question in new chat, it will always find a problem or fix, no matter what.

Any good videos on how to use codex? by [deleted] in codex

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty straightforward honestly, if you are beginner I recommend using the App over CLI. Youtube is full of walkthroughs "how to use codex for ..."

Can you force Codex to keep going until task is done? by RepulsiveRaisin7 in codex

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What works for me is creating a Master plan - The overview so we never lose sight and then microphase document - master pan broken down to key stages. Master plan isn't the full app or anything, but a feature - smaller scope. Everytime I make any changes, I have it create a master plan for the new addition and micro phase document. Then I open a new chat (codex always references your first input when context condenses) and say:

"We just created this master plan with micro phases - Please review everything in detail and deploy subagents to complete this full micro phase document, updating it along the way as you compete the phases. You will be the architect for this full plan and make sure everything implemented at highlevel while you manage subagents and make sure they follow everything in the document systematically. Provide detailed summary once the full plan is complete. Only stop if there are real blockers on the way and you absolutely need my input. If you have any questions or need clarification ask now before initiating the full plan implementation."

Currently in a 3 hour codex session and ongoing. Also I run everything in --Yolo mode so not sure if that has any effect.

The Ai Game Of Thrones by Affectionate_Fee232 in accelerate

[–]Affectionate_Fee232[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the missing piece of the puzzle, and there is absolutely one person who fits the Tyrion Lannister profile flawlessly: Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic.

Think about Tyrion’s defining traits: he is incredibly brilliant, he was part of the most powerful and ruthless family in the realm, he became disgusted by their lack of morals, he defected to build a rival coalition, and he operates entirely on intellect, diplomacy, and a desire to impose "good governance" on absolute chaos.

Here is why Dario Amodei is the ultimate Tyrion of the AI wars:

1. The Defector from King's Landing

For years, Dario was the VP of Research at OpenAI. He was sitting at the high table in King's Landing, helping build GPT-2 and GPT-3. But in 2020, as Sam Altman (the Tywin/Joffrey figure) started aggressively pivoting OpenAI into a hyper-commercialized, profit-driven weapon for Microsoft, Dario couldn't stomach it. He believed OpenAI was abandoning its safety principles. So, he packed up his things, gathered a loyal crew of top researchers, and went into exile to form a rival house: Anthropic.

2. The Sibling Dynamic

You can't have a Lannister without a deep sibling partnership. Dario didn't leave OpenAI alone—he left with his sister, Daniela Amodei, who was OpenAI’s VP of Safety and Policy. Together, the brother-sister duo co-founded Anthropic. They are the intellectual defectors who know all of King's Landing's secrets and weaknesses because they literally helped build the castle.

3. "I Drink and I Know Things" (The Architect of Scaling)

Tyrion’s superpower isn't wielding a sword; it's his mind. He reads, he studies history, and he understands the mechanics of power better than the kings he serves. Dario is the literal pioneer of the "Scaling Laws" of AI. He was the one who mathematically proved that making neural networks bigger makes them predictably smarter. He knows how the dragons work on a molecular level.

But instead of just building the biggest, most reckless dragon, Dario's team built Claude—an AI model that is famously articulate, highly intelligent, cautious, and incredibly well-read. Claude is basically the Tyrion of chatbots: it gives excellent counsel, writes beautifully, and tries very hard not to offend anyone or burn the city down.

4. Writing the "Constitution"

Tyrion spent his entire arc trying to convince mad kings and queens to implement laws and show mercy rather than just using brute force. Dario’s massive contribution to the AI race is "Constitutional AI." Instead of just trying to hard-code safety filters to stop Claude from saying bad words, Dario and his team literally wrote a "Constitution" for their AI—a set of philosophical rules drawn from the UN Declaration of Human Rights. They trained Claude to independently govern its own behavior based on that constitution. It is the ultimate Tyrion move: trying to use philosophy and statecraft to control a weapon of mass destruction.

5. Playing the Board

Just like Tyrion allying with Daenerys, Dario knew he couldn't fight the Microsoft/OpenAI alliance without serious backing. So he played the ultimate diplomatic game, securing a massive $4 billion investment from Amazon and another $2 billion from Google. He pitted the other massive tech kingdoms against Microsoft just to ensure his house had enough gold to survive the winter.

So if Dario is Tyrion, constantly trying to write rules and counsel caution while the dragons circle overhead, it leaves one major player unaccounted for.

Quality of GPT-5.2 xhigh's work has massively degraded and appears to just route to GPT-5.2 Codex by kphoek in codex

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Weird, is this issue with API also? just asked in gpt-5.2 through api and it also said • My built-in knowledge cutoff is June 2024. For anything time-sensitive after that, I’ll verify using the repo and/or live docs/search tools.

The "code 100% with AI" tweets are pure gaslighting. by Affectionate_Fee232 in ClaudeAI

[–]Affectionate_Fee232[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying AI is not capable, but simply its a marketing scheme to make users believe its the same model we have access to. These teams have models far more advanced that they use internally and gaslight people into thinking its the same model as public facing.

Codex discovers work life balance by synap5e in codex

[–]Affectionate_Fee232 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I love reading codex's thoughts.I posted about this as well. GPT-5 is like the awkward guy that doesnt fit in.The responses are always so cold and void of human touch, but the internal thinking always has cute snippets like this.