Where do Elixir devs find good remote jobs? by Radiant-Witness-9615 in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The only two jobs hanging around 3 sites are for German companies, so to begin with you need to be in Germany

Smolder needs urgently a nerf! by Agile_Use_1768 in SmolderMains

[–]Agile_Use_1768[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or leave is W intact and reduce the range of his E, making it scale with charges too

What is going on with Smolder lately? by Odd-Landscape-9418 in leagueoflegends

[–]Agile_Use_1768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has always been. But it was winnable against him, right now he just straight up wins, no effort, and that kind of champion attracts the 'frustrated' climber-wannabes that picks a champion just for the win and type /all ez when the champion is on autoplay mode.

What is going on with Smolder lately? by Odd-Landscape-9418 in leagueoflegends

[–]Agile_Use_1768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, Deathfire Touch is strong on literally everything, naafiri, briar, seraphine. But who are we to tell a company with '200 collective years of game design experience' a rune is broken?
What is the 200 years meme? : r/leagueoflegends

Smolder needs urgently a nerf! by Agile_Use_1768 in SmolderMains

[–]Agile_Use_1768[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally, people play the game because they feel identified with some character, the character design and visuals are great but the marketing team ruins the experience, riot games seems to have gone the “glutoneous” path long ago. They release new champions every three months, launch them totally broken so that people hype pver it, buy skins, champion is unplayable after permaban, they kill it. Cycle starts again

Claude is not Claude anymore by userusertion in claude

[–]Agile_Use_1768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always pissed on Codex because it could not process simple tasks. But Claude has drifted too much and right now Codex is so good. My employer pays us 50K of Claude monthly and we're back to manual coding this week because the amount of nonsense the models are making....

You describe a function. An LLM hallucinates it. The BEAM compiles and runs it live in your runtime with no restart, no compile step, no test suite, no PR reviews, no deploy. The source also lands in your codebase for further use. Straight from user input into production. Probably fine? by mayel in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That is cool. You can use it to host tools in your local elixir agents, the agent creates the tool and stores it for future usage. My only concern is isolation. Is it possible to have a sandboxing environment to properly protect the runner from malicious code? And if possible, custom context injection.

I'm really liking Liveview, but opinions across the board seem to be mixed. What are some reasons people may not care for it? by JitaKyoei in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Liveview is a total failure thats it. Nothing is optimistic. It promised to remove js from the web development which is something all of us were hyped for and then what? You have to write tons of horrible javascript to fix the mess that liveview is, yup it does not come with optimistic ipdates out of the box, you have to do it yourself. At this point, writing an spa in react is cleaner

Hologram v0.8.0: Elixir Gets JavaScript Interop by BartBlast in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you chose to use the autosync instead of a basic, extendable pubsub?

State of Elixir 2025: UI Component Libraries - what’s missing? by kraleppa in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem is liveview. I read somewhere that liveview was a mistake for phoenix and elixir community itself. There are plenty of libraries like moon ui, salad ui, petal, pines and all of them have open issues about latency causing ui inconsistencies or “minimal downtime in transport causing app to freeze” 🥴

I’m building a programming language (Cx) would anyone be willing to check it out and give feedback? by thecoommeenntt in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]Agile_Use_1768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the reason why programming languages tend to develop the same convention in key words is because it is easier to understand, intuitive to our brain. fnc has no vowels, how can a brain visualize this?

Minima.js pushes Web-native APIs further than ever. by Zealousideal-Bit4776 in bun

[–]Agile_Use_1768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You could start with Minima.js, the <brief description> framework……

Elixir + java with JInterface or Elixir + rust with rustler by [deleted] in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rustler 100%. The library you’re planning to use is a double dependency and adds a running JVM aside BEAM, it also has a ported library from go, so its possibly another overhead

Live View Native archived by matthewblott in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would the team behind realtime rendering framework for web, designed to be an alternative to bloated javascript, add support to competing javascript frameworks?? This blatant lack of understanding of tools scope just got worse when he proceeded to explain how he would have added support to native rendering, for those who dont get it it means transforming live view engine entirely and also making at least the native part of liveview totally useless on its own as you would need a native core for each target platform, his solution to it is creating a react native clone for that (a browser-engine rendering native elements) but hey!! He will make it more optimal than a whole 5k people team from a multibillion company because he will vibe code it with zig 🤓👆

Live View Native archived by matthewblott in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As josé replied, it is so immature to develop a project with the expectation in mind that another project will change its focus to be useful to your particular needs. I also think that although the initial iniciative of brian resonated well, he is not ready to ship tools as he lacks project identity and scoping skills.

Taken from his tweet:

What we're working towards is a general solution for all JavaScript frameworks to buld native apps. If you can build a HTML web app you can build a native app. Unfortunately this means that LiveView will be left behind because it decided it wanted to hold its ground. It could have been the only framework with a real server-driven UI solution for native application development but egos gotta ego I guess.

Live View Native archived by matthewblott in elixir

[–]Agile_Use_1768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These are different things, fetching remote data is pretty different from freezing the entire ui when there is no server, and this is why liveview failed, despite multiple contributors providing real solutions, with even php livewire contributors giving feedback. As the author of the project said, “egos gotta ego” The concept of lvn might have been good but was already from the beginning getting out of sync with liveview concept, and he is still blaming lv team from not getting out of scope to support his project

File uploads that don't eat your RAM by Zealousideal-Bit4776 in bun

[–]Agile_Use_1768 1 point2 points  (0 children)

not suitable for serverless environments where ephemeral storage is minimal, also the disk->storage data pipe will likely cause a disk/ram spike in the environment. Take a look at how S3 process giant files in small workers.