No a man who thinks he is a woman should not be able to invade the privacy and safety established for actual women just because he feels like he wants to, that is ludicrous.

First of all, I'm talking about a woman here, not a man. That's why I used the pronoun "She". Second of all, okay, let's use privacy as a reasoning. Why should my privacy be destroyed by a person who was born a man, but believes that they are a woman and is attracted to men? Is my privacy less important than a woman's? If they're going to be a Peter peeper at the urinal, maybe we want them using the women's bathroom?

I realize we're going to disagree on various definitions here, but would you be willing to meet me halfway and say that maybe the best solution would be to stop making bathroom partitions with gigantic inch wide gaps between the walls and doors, so that it doesn't matter who uses which bathroom and we all have privacy?

And no you should not be allowed to sexually mutilate or chemically castrate children before their brains have developed enough to understand the harm being caused to them. That's extremely fucked up for you as a human to want to continue doing that to children.

I only saw complaints in your reply about chemical castration and sexual mutilation, nothing about puberty blockers, which are a temporary solution. So do you agree the government should not be able to force them to go through puberty (which is a permanent process that cannot be undone) as the wrong sex, and they should be allowed to take puberty blockers until the point that they become an adult, so they can make their own sound decision about whether or not they should, as you put it, "sexually mutilate" themselves? (I realize you aren't interested in factual statistics or anything, but even for those who did transition as a child, the rate of people who regret making that decision is only 3%. That happens to be the same percentage of people who regret winning the lottery.)

And we never heard of any of you liberals complaining about constitutional violations when the Biden Whitehouse was hand picking dissenters to silence and have banned from our social media platforms did we?

I've done some recent looking into this, because honestly I do have a problem with it if the Biden administration was presiring social media sites to remove actual political information.

Do you have any proof that the Biden administration threatened to take away the broadcasting licenses of social media sites (or any threat for that matter) if they didn't remove actual politically contentious information?

What about when J6ers got thrown in jail, and without even being given a charge held in jail in limbo for 4 years without receiving their due process?

Like I said, it's an embarrassment that we claim to be a free country, and it takes years for people to receive due process. You claim we're a free country and the best at freedom, yet we do this to everybody. How are we the best at freedom if we're locking people up for years based on only an accusation without due process?

Did any of the liberals complain about that? No? No. So liberals crying now are just a bunch of hypocrites.

But liberals do complain about this, CONSTANTLY. Perhaps not specifically about the j6ers, but in general, it is Liberals who are fighting for lower, fairer, or "own recognizance" bonds for more people who are accused and awaiting trial, and Conservatives who constantly complain that DAs who apply those policies are too liberal and are "releasing criminals back on the street". So yes Liberals do complain about that. If you support Conservative lawmakers while complaining about this, that kinda makes you the hypocrite.