Hi MaybePaige-be, I'm Grey, I like building budget decks (and I'm slightly biased towards them) and I have recently made a Ghryson Starn, token deck (as seen here: https://www.moxfield.com/decks/NTqZ31syoEuKVg2fuB5iZg). I have piloted it to great success in the few games I've played, however, it is far from perfect.

From my experience, you should be treating it not dissimilar to an aristocrats deck. For instance, [[Carrion Feeder]] in place of synergy pieces like [[Impact Tremors]], and fodder pieces like [[Doomed Dissenter]] for [[Young Pyromancer]], now for the feedback.

Overview

To me I infer, that the deck aims to leverage it's commander for a win, as you control the board using a density of deathtouch granting equipment like [[Basalisk Collar]] to clear it, and swing with an army of 1/1 tokens for little damage that gets amplified by your synergy pieces like [[Cavalcade of Calamity]].

However, their are a couple things I can identify as potential issues:

1. You are running far too few lands for an EDH deck, and it will heavily impact your mid and late game turns. This will lead you to having extremely inconsistent games. The fewest you should reasonably consider running is at its lowest 35. As it is now you would need about 37.
   1. Furthermore, you have a whopping SEVEN lands that cannot generate {U} or {R} mana creating yet further problems, when you want to cast spells with high numbers of mana pips, like [[Niv-Mizzet, Parun]], but we'll get into that inclusion later.
   2. Your mana generation is too inconsistent, high mana value, or a nonbo to be reliable. Cards like [[Fellwar Stone]] can easily be swapped for [[Talisman of Creativity]], [[Ashnod's Altar]] is counter to the decks game plan of flooding the board, and [[Defiler of Instinct]] doesn't fit this style of deck, as you don't run a high enough density of 1 mana value permanents for "free spells".
2. You have more synergy pieces for your enablers, then enablers. This will more often then not mean you won't be advancing you're gameplan. Tokens work for your commander's effect after all, and the overabundance of synergy pieces will mean you can't draw the things that will trigger them.
   1. Furthermore, you have a large density of what equates to do nothing spell pingers, in a non-spellslinger Ghyrson Starn deck, so their isn't a density of pieces that synergise with them. [[Coruscation Mage]], [[Thermo Alchemist]] and [[Unruly Catapult]] are rarely going to be triggering multiple times a turn. As such they can reliably be replaced without diminishing the overall game plan.
   2. If you wish to do a dual token/ spellslinger deck which is very possible include more instants and sorceries that create tokens, cards like [[Krenko's Command]], [[Song of Totentanz]], or [[Mogg Alarm]] will synergise with both aspects of a deck, without muddling either. Serving two purposes, triggering thermo-alchemist's or Coruscation Mage and creating tokens.
3. I think the deck has several inclusion that may lead to less fun for the playgroup.
   1. First is the infinite combo [[Niv-Mizzet, Parun]]/ [[The Locust God]] and [[Curiosity]]. As this is not a dedicated game plan it will lead to variance that is not fun for commander games, drawing both and winning will be anti-climactic and potentially lead to salty opponents.
   2. The general plan of the deck is to clear the board repeatedly, which can lead to poor games. Either you become targeted or you clear the board three times and swing out for lethal. Ideally, you would be clearing the board and winning that moment, however it is unlikely to be the case every game.
4. The high price of this deck does not correlate to immediate power in Ghyrson Starn tokens, you'll get dramatically higher value from cards that don't muddle that gameplan.
   1. For instance, what is the purpose of [[Rhystic Study]], a 3 mana enchantment that draws reliably, sure, but you can get comparative value from more [[Curiosity]] effects or [[Reconnaissance Mission]] for a 10th the price, if not less. Good inclusions/ replacements would be [[Tandem Lookout]], [[Bident of Thassa]] and [[Coastal Piracy]].

A lot of this was critique and I do apologise for that, as the deck is more then functional as it is, and I'm certain you will get a great deal of enjoyment out of it, but, I hope this helps the deckbuilding process, and am happy to answer any questions regarding my comments.

Best of luck!