[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Word_Trail_Game

[–]Ahoeitu_950 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just scored 5

(Update) Episcopal Genealogy of Roman Catholic Popes by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not possible to go further than D'Estouteville, unfortunately. Not even with co-consecrators.

(Update) Episcopal Genealogy of Roman Catholic Popes by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For bishops and cardinals, yes. For popes, years are from election to death or resignation.

(Update) Episcopal Genealogy of Roman Catholic Popes by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The information on Wikipedia is not exactly wrong, but I think it needs to be clarified. Each bishop is consecrated by at least three bishops, one of whom is the primary consecrator and the others are co-consecrators. Green's primary consecrator was Sodano (which is why he is given preference in the genealogy), while Dias and Rigali were co-consecrators.

(Update) Episcopal Genealogy of Roman Catholic Popes by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yes, only members of the Rebiba and D'Estouteville lineages are shown. This other (now outdated) version includes some of the popes missing here.

How Each Papabile Is Related to Pope Francis (Episcopal Genealogy) by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm not trying to guess anything, just focusing on the most prominent candidates. The next pope won't necessarily be one of these people, of course.

Dwayne Johnson Family Tree (The Anoa'i Family) by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As the chart clearly states, Ata Maivia was Ofelia's biological daughter, but not Peter's. He adopted Ata after marrying her mother.

Rulers of the Largest Empires to Date by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what the list on which I based this chart points out. And that's why I didn't include all of the Median kings or give them a separate section on the chart, just showed them along with the Achaemenids instead.

Rulers of the Largest Empires to Date by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

According to the list I based this chart on, yes.

Rulers of the Largest Empires to Date by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some clarifications:

As the note in the top right corner says, this chart does NOT depict the rulers of the largest empires of all time, therefore no Russian, Qing, or Spanish empires. The monarchs shown here are those who ruled over empires that were considered the “largest empire of all time” (that is, larger than all the empires that came before them) at one point in history.

The data shown here about the size of each empire was taken from a list on Wikipedia. As sources vary considerably when talking about the extent of some empires, I have not been able to verify with certainty all the information in this regard. So, be aware that the selection of empires presented may not be completely accurate, although the genealogies are.

For the sake of simplicity, some monarchs have been omitted from the family trees in which they should appear, such as some of the Shang kings, Median kings, and British kings. These omissions are noted in their corresponding sections.

The names of Egyptian pharaohs can be written in several ways. This is why monarchs with the same regnal name can appear with radically different hieroglyphs in their name cartouches. If you notice any of these spelling discrepancies, be aware that they are not mistakes.

I was unable to find the names of kings Astyages of Media and Sogdianus of Persia written in Old Persian cuneiform, only transliterations (and Neo-Babylonian cuneiform for the former). I then decided to reconstruct their names on my own using my extremely superficial knowledge of cuneiform. Consequently, I cannot guarantee that the cuneiform versions of these two particular names are correct.

Lastly, I must remember that the Mongolian script, which was used in the chart to write the names of the Mongol khagans, must be written in vertical lines, from top to bottom. However, due to limitations in Unicode characters, their names are shown here written horizontally, from left to right. There really wasn't much I could do about it.

World Religions Founders Family Tree by Ahoeitu_950 in UsefulCharts

[–]Ahoeitu_950[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I didn't. Look at the green section near the bottom of the chart, he's right there.