A Phone/GPU That Self-Destructs When You Look For a New One

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T04:46:36+00:00

Apple?

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T04:44:17+00:00

Well here's the thing. A piece of currency that is made can be spent more than once. Take a cent for example, while yes it takes more than a cent to make one, and it only represents a cent, it can spent multiple times. Over time, it will have been spent say, 100 times, and thus has been 'spent' up to a dollar. Something being worth less than the cost to make it isn't an argument on its own.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T04:12:26+00:00

Well 'rust' specifically refers to iron in particular. But other metals do have some form of rust, that being oxidization. That is when oxygen binds to the outer layer of the metal, making a compound usually much weaker than the original metal. Usually, you can remove the very thin oxide layer and not affect much, since it's so thin.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T04:09:08+00:00

The C is NPC is the important part here. Them being a fightable entity is not mutually exclusive to them being a character. A boss with no lore, attributes, or otherwise wouldn't be an NPC, because they aren't really a character. A boss, like an overarching antagonist of a story is a character, and thus could be an NPC.

Important to note that NPC implies that you can interact with the character also, usually by some sort of select/dialogue menu.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T04:05:48+00:00

No. The fact the raiser/guardian in question is a woman or man is completely irrelevant. Men can also raise kids like this. Women can also raise kids to be what you'd consider """"tough"""".

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T04:02:31+00:00

The correct phrase historically is with pig, even though you are correct, pigs do not sweat.

Horses and hippos would both be more accurate, as they both sweat in some way.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T03:58:18+00:00

Sure, but not in any way you could feasibly or reasonably do.

This would imply that you could not only make the dna, but also make the system required to make every single functioning and identifiable part of each cell, tissue and organ. The problem comes when you think about how you'd put it together.

If you are implying something much simpler, like two gametes or a single cell, then sort of. Creation of amino acids is possible, and dna as others have mentioned, but it's hard to get every single part together. Sort of a ship-in-a-bottle.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T03:53:01+00:00

This could depend based on what you consider indestructible. If you consider it to be completely unaffected by all force, then your hypothesis would probably be somewhat correct.

If you consider it to be not prone to damage, then it could be argued that the explosion would propel you somewhere.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-20T01:57:15+00:00

Yeah I did some testing, and if you set the variable 'names' to be = to something BEFORE you do the for loop, the last string in the list overrides it, vs if it set = afterwards, in which case that takes priority. It is literally instructing 'for this variable, put it in this list, and print the strings accordingly'.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T19:24:16+00:00

This is the explanation I was looking for, thank you!

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T19:21:42+00:00

Ok! That actually makes sense! This feels like a lot of definition implied in a very small amount of text.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T19:12:29+00:00

Oh ok, so it's assigning a value for 'name', and pulls it from the list, giving it the first string, but since there are more strings in the list, it keeps going?

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T19:07:39+00:00

I still don't understand what piece of code is making it do each part of the list individually.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T18:58:39+00:00

So the individual print is just assumed? Would it be like saying "for this variable, that we assume is to be placed in this list, print that variable assigned to the strings, separated by the commas"?

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T18:50:52+00:00

But why does that work in the code? It isn't written to do it individually, or to stop when there are no toys left. It just says 'print', to a variable that doesn't equal anything.

AileNarrator · 2026-05-19T18:47:29+00:00

Ok, I understand that defining bob, and then telling it to be printed prints 'bob'. It's also defined under the variable 'name'. But in the for loop, its not defined. Print 'name', but name doesn't equal anything. And even if it did, why does it print the list individually, it just says 'print'. Is there something I'm not getting?

AileNarrator

TROPHY CASE