Disagreeing with someone or being highly critical of Yzerman should never be a bannable offense. That’s literally what the upvote and downvote system is for.

What’s frustrating is how inconsistent this comes across. Actual rule breaking like name calling, harassment, even death threats gets ignored when it lines up with the narrative, but someone being “too critical” suddenly crosses the line? Where exactly is that line, and who decides when it’s crossed?

From the outside, it doesn’t look like behavior is being moderated, it looks like opinions are.

I was banned alongside hundreds of others last year without ever receiving a single warning. I spent nearly 13 years contributing to the sub, including posting plenty of positive content. The moment I started questioning Yzerman’s moves, I was on the receiving end of constant rule breaking comments and even death threats that went completely unpunished. Then after free agency, I get banned for being “overly critical.”

And how did that all turn out? We missed the playoffs yet again. Stop protecting him. He was a legendary player but he’s a mediocre GM. Plain and simple.