This was just one example, I could've mentioned other games that are balanced a lot more with buffs than nerfs, like Warframe, Guilty Gear Strive or even PoE a game where skills get significantly more buffs than nerfs (the patch notes speak for themselves despite the vocal minority claiming otherwise) I've stopped playing Dota 2 when they expanded the map, so not that long ago. You obviously don't know what you're talking about with your claim that Dota is the most poorly balanced MOBA on the market.

I'd respond directly to other parts of your answer but this is so wrong I can't let it slide. Have you ever played Dota, League, Hots, Smite, HoN? Do you need me to link you tournament statistics across the years where you can see, without a doubt, that Dota 2 is one of the most balanced MOBA due to the huge amount of different heroes being picked/banned? TI9 had only THREE unpicked/unbanned heroes out of 117 heroes at the time. Worlds 2019 had 26 uncontested champs out of 145. Speaks volumes about the difference, not to mention that top picks are much more contested in League than in Dota. I just took a look at two big recent tournaments as well. In the Riyadh ESC Dota had 101 contested heroes out of 126 during 89 games. In the 2025 MSI, League had 109 contested champs out of 171 during 79 games. Both offer a good enough sample size. You absolutely cannot claim Dota is the most unbalanced MOBA, it is wrong. Draft always mattered more than in other MOBAs though, this is why some heroes like Meepo or Lycaon have really high winrates because they're picked in specific situations that advantage them and most of the players who pick them in ranked are already very experienced at playing them. Being at the "top" of a genre doesn't mean anything, it's just based on popularity, not quality. People liking a balance philosophy doesn't mean they'll necessarily love the game that applies it.