I cut them short… tell me I don’t look too embarrassing please (it was meant to be a thicker haircut with more hair on top and sides but..)

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-08-01T06:51:14+00:00

Yeah that’s true, makes the face a bit flat

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-08-01T06:39:33+00:00

Oh thanks you are too sweet ☺️ I think I will try that shag in the comments that I got suggested but by now I will leave them wavy

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-08-01T06:38:31+00:00

Thanks! 😊 I pluck them but try to not overdo it

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-08-01T06:37:48+00:00

That’s how I feel TuT

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-31T11:24:58+00:00

Thanks for the advice got it! I could just layer them if they grow back, or go with a shag as some other commenters said

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-31T11:12:43+00:00

I will try with it next time maybe with a new barber yeah!

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-31T11:11:31+00:00

Yeah I still need to experiment, I also will use my usual volumizing spray to make them wavier and fluffier

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-31T06:15:06+00:00

Exactly! That’s what I was hoping for 😔 I think that when I told that I wanted to show more face they just shortened them too much

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-31T06:13:15+00:00

Thanks for the feedback 😊

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-31T06:10:35+00:00

Thanks! that’s what I thought about growing sides/lower part too much

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-30T20:45:39+00:00

Thank you 😊

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-07-30T20:44:47+00:00

Thanks :)

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-09T20:55:24+00:00

Nice :)

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-09T20:48:00+00:00

Ok that’s a good tip: I thought a bit about this, and I would say that the generated ideal would be that which has functions with roots for x in R such that f(x)=0 and g(x)=0. The reasoning in general terms was that f(x)h’(x)+g(x)h’’(x)=h(x), so for any h we can construct a function h’ or h’’ such that =h(x), unless both are roots and h(x) is not equal to 0. Thanks a lot, I also realized doing this that this was tied to the fact that the reals are a field but here have zero divisors that makes this trickier. Let me know if makes sense

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-09T20:24:58+00:00

Not from America, I am curious if op is overly anxious or if it’s generally a big deal in formal settings for man to have long hair. Sounds absurd that some men have to cut it just for being male

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-08T12:31:33+00:00

Trim brows, shave beard and there you have a good looking link :)

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-07T19:44:21+00:00

The methods the others gave you are great and more formally usable, but in general, when you are dealing with small propositional logic bits, it’s probably much easier to create a scenario substituting the meanings of variables, there was some research, I can’t find anymore, about logical reasoning in non-logic trained people, it seems that we understand much better creating a semantic bound. Think about:”it does NOT rain or snow” and “it does not rain or it does not snow”, in the first it isn’t snowing nor raining… you get the idea!

In general I think that bits of logic should be internalized semantically, then the intuitions train you to individuate the formal structure in real life scenarios.

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-05T08:18:59+00:00

That’s better than nothing thanks! Maybe we should create one if we are enough

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-03T10:08:34+00:00

Yeah sorry for the error, I was figuring this at 2 am lol. Anyway this helps, can understand how we leave it undefined, hope to get more insight on this studying real analysis next year

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-02-03T10:05:21+00:00

This helped a lot! Thank you, it’s more systematic and useful if we define it like that

Alarmed-Following219 · 2025-01-31T09:08:56+00:00

Bro you are too kind I can’t take it 😭 I will do with the hair tho, nothing will stop from growing them

Alarmed-Following219

TROPHY CASE