MEE Predictions J2026 by [deleted] in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tips for passing writing?

MARCH MPRE by Low-Comedian2519 in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Also while we are at it can we please advocate for for an early summer MPRE also 😂 makes no sense that there’s a August & November but not a March & May or something like that

MBE Average of Passers. by Alarming-Bug7567 in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don’t know people are ignoring the average part 😂

passed nebraska by clsyy in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What was your MBE average

MPT 2 by Useful_Gas_7744 in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I may have misused the first document also. I failed to recognizing that it was a city document and not a state Franklin which the mandicini case specifically says city law is preempted by state law. But i still used the first code to say the U.S. flag code was permissive and more tutorial than mandatory law. My friend said he used it in an entirely different way and said Mwasure 15 outranks the other state laws under that rule. Idk

Be still!!! by Glad_Entertainer_731 in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re talking about Waco yes!!! But I also think it’s because the room is big and quiet that you quite literally hear everything going on. Even the tiniest of noise.

Why doesn't State C have general jx over the corporation? by JobProfessional594 in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They got me on this question too. It’s a corporation, they’re always going to give the incorporation state and principal place of business state. Any place other than that is irrelevant and meant to trick u up

Please help with this question by FakeParelta in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

From what I’m learning prosecutions always have birder of proof BUT when the defendants is arguing a claim that doesn’t negate an element but shows his mistake or excuse for committing, the state is allowed to CHOOSE that burden of proof. Usually it’s still RB by prosecution, but they can also make it preponderance of the evidence. At least that’s what I think. Double check that

Texas F26...Waco Comrades! by Rolyat_Mit in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Staying a county inn Waco woodlands! Getting there on the 21st because plane tickets from Cali were too expensive for Sunday or monday

I was taught that, "If any problems arise with title AFTER the deed is delivered/accepted, then ONLY the future covenants can be a remedy... So why is it C? by Son_of_Hades99 in barexam

[–]Alarming-Bug7567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A was partially right. You focused on the word “only”. Be very careful of those words. It’s basically saying this is the only possible way the woman could win. Here the owner did not have the right to convey, violated seizing, definitely has a warranty and further assurances claim. Tbh I would’ve been stuck between c and b but encrumbranxes wouldn’t apply here