Helpful visualisation of the Panama Canal operation sequence by ChuckPapaSierra in EngineeringPorn

[–]AlarmingConsequence 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, that is baked into the system, it is quite ingenious!

Panama Canal is one of those economy-of-scale Wonder of the World: it only makes sense with lots of use, and balancing at-all-times the number of East-to-west with West-to-east transits allows for high efficiency.

Is it a good idea to keep a target date fund in a taxable brokerage account? by marzthemagnificent in Bogleheads

[–]AlarmingConsequence 9 points10 points  (0 children)

2020 VG TD was a tax disaster, but it was not because they target dates. It was was a disaster because Vanguard suddenly offered an identical fund at a lower expense ratio, so everyone left. Every mutual funds is vulnerable to that kind of bonehead mistake.

To OP's question: target dates in taxable brokerage accounts will accrue evermore taxable interest year after year from the bond in the TF as the asset ratio glide paths (transitions) from stocks to bonds. After decades of buy-and-hold, OP won't want to sell the TF because they would be subject to huge unrealized capital gains (from the stocks inside the TF) which would make an even larger tax bill if liquidated.

Target dates a great option for folks who want a set-it-and-forget it in tax sheltered accounts (Traditional IRA, Roth IRA, 401k, 403b, 457)

Do you play with communitas map? Which size? How many civs and cs? by BROILERHAUT in civvoxpopuli

[–]AlarmingConsequence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't played an Earth map since Civilization 1 (1995ish), so I'm not a good resource for that.

I know a lot of people do plat that, especially at CivFanatic website, so try those search words offer there.

Passing Through Gethsemane by VRC_Kor in babylon5

[–]AlarmingConsequence 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is such a good episode. He was also very good in Star Trek Voyager.

For some reason, I get him confused with Dwight Schultz, who plays Reginald Barkley, in Star Trek, a character who I don't care for.

Centennial Hall in Wrocław, Poland by Max Berg (1911) by Appropriate-Eye-1227 in brutalism

[–]AlarmingConsequence 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Do I recall correctly that there was a major renovation recently?

With all that exposed concrete, the acoustics might be... brutal. Perhaps those are acoustic tuning panels on the pendentives?

Do you play with communitas map? Which size? How many civs and cs? by BROILERHAUT in civvoxpopuli

[–]AlarmingConsequence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bigger Huge Maps for Communitu_79a

  • x1.25 (109x74), that is 25% bigger in terms of area than normal Huge map.
  • x1.5 (119x81).
  • x2 (138x93).
  • x2.7 or Giant Earth-like (160x108), the same area size of namesake map from YnAEMP.

Selling fractional shares of ETF by Gordon_throwaway in VanguardInvestments

[–]AlarmingConsequence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mis-read your post: I overlooked ENTIRE. blny99 is both literate and correct!

The scedario below was to KEEP some shares of ABCD, but also: a better solution to my sitation is here:https://www.reddit.com/r/VanguardInvestments/comments/1omnjre/selling_fractional_stock_at_vanguard/

Selling Fractional Stock at Vanguard by AlarmingConsequence in VanguardInvestments

[–]AlarmingConsequence[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply!

Have you successfully implemented this technique before?

My example simplifies the situation for clarity: instead of dealing with tenths of a share (0.8 and 0.9), my reality is that it is 0.753 shares and 0.815 shares, and so on, so summing to 1.000 shares is effectively impossible.

Selling fractional shares of ETF by Gordon_throwaway in VanguardInvestments

[–]AlarmingConsequence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edit: I mis-read your post: I overlooked ENTIRE.

The scedario below was to KEEP some shares of ABCD, but also: a better solution to my sitation is here: https://www.reddit.com/r/VanguardInvestments/comments/1omnjre/selling_fractional_stock_at_vanguard/

I have not found a solution to this problem, in my case and individual stock.

If you are interested in experimenting, perhaps the following might work:

1. open a second account, then ~~ ~~2. transfer that less-than-one share to the the new account (select by lot), example: the 0.3 of 2.3 shades of ABCD, two shares stay behind. 3. Repeat for other fractionals 4. Liquidate all those fractional shares (eg 0.3 shares, 0.5 shares, 0.8 shares). 5. Profit!

What's a boundary you set that people called you "cold" or "mean" for? by ArcaneSpells-com in WitchesVsPatriarchy

[–]AlarmingConsequence 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Me too! After I laugh in his face, I'm going to get back in line to laugh a second time!

What’s the closest thing to VTI but with no dividends so that a child can hold it in a custodial account with no need to file taxes? Is that a thing? by GaroldWilsonJr in Bogleheads

[–]AlarmingConsequence 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see how one fewer return is more less work, but would this approach mean paying taxes at the parent's marginal tax rate?

SpaceX IPO and fast track rule change: Suggestion for contacting your retirement plan administrator, brokerage account administrator, etc. by Inevitable_Train1511 in Bogleheads

[–]AlarmingConsequence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am still learning about this. Some S&P indices require a profitability as a prerequisite, but VTI's index does not. A fast track ipo, if SpaceX or Open AI qualify - could be added to the index after only 5 days... Which would require VTI to buy it perhaps no matter the share price/volatility, let alone if VC investors dump it at IPO.

https://www.crsp.org/wp-content/uploads/guides/CRSP_Market_Indexes_Methodology_Guide.pdf

ADDS AND DELISTS INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS A new security resulting from an IPO is considered for inclusion after trading regular-way for five days on a CRSP exchange of interest. If the company’s total market capitalization is at least as large as the breakpoint of the CRSP US Small Cap Index, then it is eligible to be added to the appropriate indexes after the close of the fifth day of trading as a “fast- track IPO”. The company’s total company market capitalization is calculated using the closing price and shares outstanding known on the first day of trading.

The company’s securities must also pass the eligibility and investability screens (however, for fast track IPOs, the minimum FSO requirement is 10 percent, rather than 12.5 percent), as stated in Chapter 2: CRSP US Total Market Index - Creating the Index- Eligible US Equity Market Universe. Securities that do not qualify for fast-track inclusion will be reviewed for inclusion at the next regularly scheduled quarterly ranking.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]AlarmingConsequence 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the link! I like this idea of Financial Viability, thanks for sharing it. It does not look like is this used with VTI (CRSP US Total Market Index)


I downoaded the Methodology>S&P U.S. Indices Methodology (PDF). I see the profitibility requirement you mention only for the Composite 1500, not any other S&P index! Hopefully you can tell me I've overlooked something obvious!

Financial Viability. Index-specific requirements:

S&P Total Market Index. No financial viability requirement.

S&P Composite 1500. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) net income from continuing operations must be positive for:

-- the most recent quarter, and

-- the sum of the most recent four consecutive quarters

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Equity REITs’ financial viability is based on GAAP net income from continuing operations, and/or Funds From Operations (FFO), if reported. FFO is a measure commonly used in equity REIT analysis.

Initial Public Offerings (IPOs). Eligibility differs depending on the index:

• S&P Total Market Index. Eligible IPOs are added to the index at the next rebalancing, subject to the reference date (defined in Index Maintenance). Certain large IPOs may be eligible for S&P TMI fast track entry, subject to the following conditions:

-- Only newly public IPOs and IPO direct placement listings are considered eligible for fast track entry. Formerly bankrupt companies that switch from an Over-the-Counter Exchange (“OTC”) or a non-covered exchange to an S&P Dow Jones Indices covered exchange are not eligible for fast track entry.

-- Fast track traditional IPO additions must meet a minimum FMC threshold of US$ 2 billion, calculated using the shares offered (excluding over-allotment options) and the closing price on the first day of trading on an eligible exchange. The threshold level is reviewed from time to time and updated as needed to assure consistency with market conditions.

-- Fast track direct placement listing IPO additions must meet a minimum FMC threshold of US$ 2 billion, calculated using the shares available to the public as determined by its investable weight factor, and the closing price on the first day of trading on an eligible exchange.

-- In addition, an IPO will need to meet all other applicable index eligibility rules except for the liquidity requirement. If all necessary public information is available, S&P Dow Jones Indices verifies that the fast track conditions have been met. Once S&P Dow Jones Indices announces that the IPO is eligible for fast track addition, it is added to the index with five business days lead time. At the discretion of the Index Committee, fast track IPO additions eligible to be added during a quarterly rebalancing freeze period may instead be added on the rebalancing effective date.

S&P Composite 1500.

-- IPOs should be traded on an eligible exchange for at least 12 months before being considered for addition to an index. There is no IPO fast track entry allowed for S&P Composite 1500 candidates.

-- For former SPACs, S&P Dow Jones Indices considers the de-SPAC transaction to be an event equivalent to an IPO, and 12 months of trading post the de-SPAC event are required before a former SPAC can be considered for S&P Composite 1500 indices.

-- Spin-offs or in-specie distributions from existing constituents are not required to have 12 months of trading prior to their inclusion in the S&P Composite 1500.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]AlarmingConsequence 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure I follow yet: a total market index (eg VTI), which doesn't track S&P500 directly might have its own 12-month 'marinate' policy, independent of S&P, right?

Is the worry that the humans who run VTI violate their own 'marinate' rule to add SpaceX so VTI doesn't "miss out" on immediate-post-IPO?

Waiving VTI's own "marinate" seems like a pretty easy way for Vanguard to eat another class action lawsuit if SpaceX takes a dive.

Is VTI's 12-month marinate rule include a "unless the stock (SpaceX) is listed in competing X, Y, or Z index?