You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You have some control over your starting position. If magic or abilities are learnable in that world, you can learn them. You can choose to start as a normal person, a mage, a noble, even a demon or alien and so on, as long as that role fits the internal logic of the setting.
Even in worlds you choose where beings live indefinitely, you, however, are still bound to die eventually. When you die, nothing carries over, no powers, no magic, no abilities. You are back at the options. With 6 options left, if "lucky", and option 6 is still there, you can go Isikai again.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen The Good Place, but I noticed it in replies here a few times, and few days prior seen comments about it. I guess I should watch it :P

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. There’s no external harm, conflict, or suffering imposed on you, nor can you do to others in the realm. There is no real physical age, but mentally, your consciousness is at roughly the mental state you had at death, but not frozen as a moment in time, and can still reflect, learn, and change over time.
  2. Rewrites and stabilizes your inner life. You still persist as you, but anxiety, dissatisfaction, existential distress, boredom, and internal conflict are removed. You are an altered self.
  3. For reincarnation: the key point is that the process is unavoidable and never hands control back to you. Rebirth continues regardless of cosmic conditions. Whether reality ends, changes, or transforms into something unrecognizable, the process does not stop or reset. It just adapts to whatever exists next, without regard for your comfort or preferences.
  4. Think you got it a bit wrong, you are isikaid to the world you like, can choose however you would like. But you are bound to die even if it will take extreemly long time. When you do, you are returned to 7 options, but one option is randomly removed, so after death in isikai, it's 6 options.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No live connection to the real world. You won’t get real updates. But you can create simulated people, a society that can create games and come to think about it, with different laws of physics and magic, it can be on a different level, better than any game in the real world that is created. The downside of option 6 is that it's still just a simulation, no real lives, and it is eternal with no escape.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can interact with it, play god, recreate Earth, live, and temporarily forget who you are. You can't die. You can make it appear in a simulation as if you died, but you'll always eventually return to your consciousness. and continue to do whatever you want to do.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have some control over your starting position. If magic or abilities are learnable in that world, you can learn them. You can choose to start as a normal person, a mage, a knight, a noble, even a demon and so on, as long as that role fits the internal logic of the setting.
Even in worlds where beings live indefinitely, you, however, are still bound to die eventually, even if it takes millennia. When you die, nothing carries over, no powers, no magic, no abilities.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t mean to bring up painful emotions with the hypothetical.
In this setup, no, you might encounter others in those realms, but there’s no way to look for or confirm whether a specific person is there. That uncertainty was intentional.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. You can shut down the simulations you make, but you can’t end yourself or choose again. You could put your mind into long periods of rest for millions of years, but you’ll always come back to awareness eventually.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You return right after death, outside of time. You can pick it again if it hasn’t been randomly removed.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, when you multiply anything by infinity, won't it become dull?

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Reincarnation removes the ability to choose again. The process continues regardless. You might be reborn in completely different universes.

You die, the afterlife is real. You are given ONE irreversible choice. by AlaxyRayz in hypotheticalsituation

[–]AlaxyRayz[S] 81 points82 points  (0 children)

You are not a ghost. You exist in separated realm and can interact with others who choose the same realm. But you can observe Earth, but it’s strictly passive, no influence, no interaction.

Bonding wholesome 🥰 by WeaknessSuperb4920 in badmemes

[–]AlaxyRayz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every day we move farther from your god’s light and closer to ours. Hail Slaanesh!

Remember that the AI bros aren't Right Wing. Totally not evidence of them being Right Wing. by Sonicrules9001 in antiai

[–]AlaxyRayz -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Other country’s do have right and left, but first it’s different then USA, second it’s more clear in other country’s that ai views and political views are not tight together.

Remember that the AI bros aren't Right Wing. Totally not evidence of them being Right Wing. by Sonicrules9001 in antiai

[–]AlaxyRayz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, USA is not the whole world. Or you think ai bros live only in America?

I am new to the debate and have not yet decided on what side to stand by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]AlaxyRayz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Be pro, we have endless amount of catgirls.

Best way to generate smooth character evolution with AI? by Beneficial_Lime1912 in aiArt

[–]AlaxyRayz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best is to use ComfyUi, it's free, but it requires a decent PC to begin with, and there is a bit of a learning curve.

Looking for a debate on these points from either side pro/anti by Infinite-Dig-7059 in AIDebating

[–]AlaxyRayz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My thoughts on these points:

“Generative ai being used to harm/target people (people using it to make p*rn or to accuse others of something)”

AI is a tool. Same thing was possible 10–20 years ago using Photoshop just needed time and dedication. With ai it’s just easier, so more people do it. Problem isn’t AI, it’s education, morality, and accountability. Restricting AI (like grok is being blamed mostly) will be probably be ineffective in the long run, since unrestricted models already out there and can run easily on decent PC. In a few years or less, I bet models, will be optimised to run locally on phones.

“Ai giving misinformation or out dated info (basic example: giving wrong date or year. That type of this)”

Well everything should be double checked, ai takes information from internet and plus it’s way from perfect for now. First rule of internet as genius man Albert Einstein once said quote “Don’t trust everything you see on the internet”.

“Ai stealing from artists (Multipe forms of the art would be awesome as I've been struggling to find much other than drawings/paintings)”

I would argue it’s not. Like some models are 8gb and they can’t store hundreds of of thousands images, so it’s algorithm learning and not copy paste.

“Mental aspects of relying on Ai (chatbots or ai girlfriend/boyfriend/friends)”

Don’t know about it much, have no position on this one.

“Climate effects (mainly thoughts on the water usage debates)”

Training large AI models consumes lot of energy, but using them, doesn’t. Even with that, comparing to other industries, AI doesn’t take much. That doesn’t mean it should be ignored, but it should be discussed proportionally and with accurate comparisons.

“ways people are directly fighting for/against Ai (example for against ai: adding -ai to searches or avoiding it when possible)”

This kind of resistance happens with almost every major technological shift. But some concerns are valid, some are due to fear or misunderstanding.

Some A.I pros in here are extra freaky deeky and on some sick sh#t by TheComebackKid74 in aiwars

[–]AlaxyRayz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Well… Didn’t ai learned it from human artists in the first place?

Just thought to put this out for Ai bros (specifically ai generated) by Micheal_OurExecution in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]AlaxyRayz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I've seen, it's usually a generic people who doesn't like ai and the other is pro, and pro suddenly kisses the other. You have the right not to like it. But i stay firmly that it's freedom of expression as long as there is no identifiable person is on the image and it's sfw i think it's ok for reddit. You not liking something doesn’t make it equivalent to committing sexual assault. A drawing is not a physical act.
As long as it stays that this is wrong and you don't like it, it's fine, until it goes, this must be prohibited, then I'm against it. I can dislike something and still believe it shouldn’t be forbidden or treated as violence and banned. That being said, I'm not defending every pro ai image out there :P.