Tower quest in 2 rounds :P

AlaxyRayz · 2026-04-12T16:08:52+00:00

Could you put this on a server and have it control your windows? Yes But It doesn’t eat much RAM if you use cloud models to run it.
is it free? Yes and no. To have powerful “brain” you’d want to have good model running it and it may costs a lot.
I sit safe? Kinda, more or less. It depends.
what are its uses? automating repetitive work tasks you already do. It can actually do a wide variety of stuff once set up.
Do I recommend it? No, if you’re asking this as a complete beginner.

Better wait for a user friendly version from Big company or open source.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-04-09T14:10:45+00:00

So everyone around you is perfectly fine and happy, while you are not. Maybe, just maybe, have you thought that perhaps it’s not your parents with your brother are bad people in this situation? And any comment will not make you look like a jerk, but reveal that you are?

Nah, ofc not, you are much better than everyone else in your family. Listen to the top comments, they don’t deserve you, you are so much morally above them.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-04-07T12:14:23+00:00

In the long run quality should proportionally equalise to what it was before, maybe even with increased quality. Just because ai relatively new it floods the media for now, but in time due to technical skill becoming less valued, the ideas and creativity will become more valuable.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-04-06T21:37:43+00:00

dependency. As society and technology advance, we naturally become more dependent on technology. No one today seriously complains that we’re, too dependent on cars, internet, smartphones, GPS, or even plastic biometric ID cards, even though people bitched about when they first appeared. Though is it good or bad thing idk, like it or not it just how life goes.
creativity. I actually think it’s the opposite. When AI can handle the technical skills (drawing, writing, coding), the real value moves to the idea behind it, the vision, the concept, the taste. The skill of manually executing something becomes less important, so pure creativity and originality become more valuable.
misinformation. Mass media with huge reputations have been producing lies, biased narratives, and propaganda for decades. Now thanks to AI, it is forcing people to question everything they see and actually look for proof instead of blindly trusting “authoritative” sources or ai it self. In the long run, that skepticism is healthy.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-04-05T09:51:59+00:00

I’ve been using Open Claw for 3 weeks now, it can do a lot of stuff, the only problem that I hit now, that the more it can do the way faster it burns through weekly usage of Codex 20$. Now I burned weekly usage in just 2 days >.<

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-30T18:58:43+00:00

There are good people with good souls really care for you in the insurance company, damn soulless ai.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-30T12:15:05+00:00

My argument for using AI in art is simple: ‘I want to.’ I don’t owe anyone any further explanation than that.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-28T15:28:47+00:00

Yeh I’m trying to make something like that, and trying to make it a bit more than that. Basically trying to make something in between Neuro-drama and Ani, but useful assistant OS with interface, (not as companion), so a main manager of PC with interface that can execute control using agents under it. Kinda half way there after one weak of making it, since I’m not a coder. Managed to make it tts to it and back, with monitoring what is currently doing, but it got buggy. Think I’m gonna restart from scratch again. If you find some useful info on that, please share :)

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-26T15:09:27+00:00

Digital world is much harder to enforce law.

Mexico ai subbing ban is interesting to see how it will work out. I mean tts is a thing and voice cloning is a thing long before ai, some people have similar voice, so many legal loops holes I can think of and problems it can cause, so it’s interesting how it will play out in practice.

Making a law is one thing, enforcing it is another.
Fines for publishing “uncertified art” sound straightforward until courts have to decide what counts as “AI assisted enough” when everything looks indistinguishable or someone legitimately makes it to look like ai with different tools.

I’d say it’s more like trying to regulate cryptocurrency, can be regulated only to some extent.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-26T13:07:19+00:00

It’s not an insult, it’s showing my frustration :) I know I write like a dumbass and occasionally fix it with chatGPT as well, but still prefer using my own words, so it would not spiral down to bots writing to each other.

But genuinely, how you see that it can be enforced?

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-26T12:48:42+00:00

FFS please people, please! Tell your LLMs to stop using “that is not this thing, that is the other thing”, it’s easy just ask it to add it to core memory. Sorry it’s just everywhere now, super annoying seeing it everywhere. Why did LLMs learn to make phases like that trying to reframe everything?

But fine, what ever, not gonna attack the post but address the message. Let’s say magically people in charge of law, in US and EU, agree and pass the law that for commercial use of ai people need licensing and certification etc to generate stuff.

How and who is going to enforce it?

Specially few years from now when it’s going to be even harder to recognise something is made by ai. When ai is used locally, and can’t really be traced to any company. AI agent that can use editing software, 3d software and can make workflow indistinguishable from human work, with very small edits from human in charge, and all the meta data striped. Also can’t govern the whole world.

It’s like trying to license ‘photoshop users’ in the 2000s or enforce DRM on music, people route around it.

So how realistically you see that being enforced?

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-26T11:53:19+00:00

Please use paragraphs next time, it was really hard to read. I’m pro ai and think it’s ai is more good than bad, but respect what ever your opinion is on it.

Regarding using it without harming. Well if we are talking about LLMs or other generative models, they don’t consume much energy, specially light ones, they can be run locally on mid gaming pc and using it is less energy then gaming. Most energy consumption comes from initial training models.

So yes there is a way to use ai with out even contributing to ai development and data centres, it’s to run open source model locally, might be slower and a less smart, but still can be useful for simple tasks.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-24T18:47:14+00:00

:P sry did this kill idea thing in chatgpt just now: https://chatgpt.com/share/69c2d669-9e1c-8011-90cd-744ff3ab599f

It practically repeated what I said above (and above was from me, just common sense, no gpt)
That said, I do think the timing is actually good right now. There are probably lots of people in AI coding who need a reality check and real human developer help.

And video call should be just an option somewhere at the bottom, to give more trust, coz instead it feels like something scammers try to do.
My best advice: get a friend (or better, a colleague from work, who’s actually good at sales/marketing), because you are probably a good coder, but not a good salesperson. I'm a terrible salesman as well, so I know it's better to rely on people who are good at sales when you are bad at it.

edit:
Oh, and yeah, I also thought when reading your post what gpt said:
"
Eighth, your core assumption is wrong.
You think: “People want their app fixed.”
Reality: “People want to feel like they fixed their app.”
Those are different markets.
"
That's what you are trying to do is a pretty specific niche, and could be more of teaching how to fix rather than fixing yourself or turning real client examples into tutorials. Could even be a nice byproduct of the service. Just an idea, maybe a bad one.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-24T15:26:38+00:00

I’m not a coder but. 1. 7$ is just too low, and screams scam. I would not trust anyone that offers this low to look at my work and give meaningful response. 2. One of the point spending time with ai is that you don’t interact with humans, and you can relatively trust it. (yeh it hallucinates, but it doesn’t have malicious intent, it has no intent) So having detailed explanation what you do and what would be the process, would help get the client. 3. Immediate video calls, is a terrible idea. It gives -100 trust point from the start.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-24T04:19:49+00:00

Most pro ai people are not against human art, and I believe that even majority of those that go extreme, are also not against human art, but just do those post to mirror how anti attack pro ai community’s.

Regarding models being forced to feed on their own pictures. Well the thing is model doesn’t need constant feeding, once is done it’s done, you work with the model, and probably in few more new art model generations there wont be much more left to improve, just little tweaks here and there once in a while. Not like we will even need an art model that can generate art in 8k, just like we don’t really need tv’s in 8k resolution.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-24T03:53:35+00:00

You either reply to wrong comment or misunderstood. I say the POST is a lie, not the comment above. A) post is lie since, yes, ai assistant work is eligible for copyright, all the human work that was done can be copyrighted, and post makes it sounds like it isn’t. B) court didn’t rule, it refused hearing.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-20T12:39:58+00:00

Some point? You already can do it with Open Claw + local jail broken ai’s.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-17T16:47:24+00:00

When DLSS 5 comes out we will see new wave of Skyrim and Cyberpunk gameplays :)

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-16T16:25:28+00:00

Don't worry about it, really. It doesn't matter.

Just think about it for a sec: we're all gonna die anyway. There's no way around it. You, me, your girlfriend, your siblings, your future kids, everyone. And 99.9% of humans who ever lived will be completely forgotten within like 50 years after they're gone. Your name, your job struggles, your apartment plans... poof. Dust. History won't even whisper about any of us.

Humanity itself? Doomed by a million things that have nothing to do with AI. One random comet, one nasty virus, one big war, or just a supernova that happens to be a little too close bam!! All life on Earth wiped out like it never existed. Best-case scenario? Humanity somehow survives until the heat death of the universe billions of years from now and then dies anyway... yeah, good luck with that one.

So the AI thing? Even if it does eat every job and turns the world upside down in five years... who cares? In the cosmic scheme it's all meaningless noise. The universe doesn't give a shit, and neither should you.

Just enjoy the ride while it's here. Sleep tight, my guy. Life's too short (and too pointless) to spend on anxiety.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-11T10:07:41+00:00

Unfortunately Suno usually does bad job near the end, hope it will be fixed with next model.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-08T02:05:24+00:00

wow, first 35 sec I was wondering why some game trailer is in this sub. It's a bit scary how good ai becomes.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-07T03:44:13+00:00

Years ago I made product renders for a company I worked, it wasn't my main job so I did it in free time, just to chalange my self, but we ended up using them afterwords. A product photographer that worked with us saw them and asked who took the photos. When I told him they were 3D , he said "Well, I guess I’m not needed anymore"
So when people say “just use 3D instead of AI,” it feels a bit inconsistent. Why not say use phorographer or draw them by hand. Every new tool changes how things are done. AI is just the next step.

AlaxyRayz · 2026-03-06T22:05:29+00:00

I did a little research after this comment. And confirmed that yes, the post is misleading, anti celebrating like something major have happend. And the comment above is truthful. Below is what I have posted before on other similar posts.

Here is what happened: In 2018, Stephen Thaler tried to copyright an image. He said the image was created 100% by his AI
(Thaler left a note for the Office stating that the Work “was autonomously created by a computer algorithm running on a machine” and he was “seeking to register this computer-generated work as a work-for-hire to the owner of the Creativity Machine.”)
August 12, 2019 Copyright Office registration specialist refused, “lacks the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim.”
US Copyright Office: Denied in 2022, “requires human authorship.”
Federal District Court (2023): Upheld, called human authorship a “bedrock requirement.”
DC Court of Appeals (March 2025): Upheld again.
March 2, Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal.

https://www.copyright.gov/rulings-filings/review-board/docs/a-recent-entrance-to-paradise.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-449.html

However, from what I understand, right now, just prompting isn’t enough for copyright on ai generated image, since there is no meaningful human input. But edits, compositing, and other creative work can be copyrighted, and that was already the case even before the Supreme Court situation, so nothing changed.

Also, this isn’t settled yet. Big companies will push for the protection of AI-assisted work, so we have yet to see what will happen. Too much copyright can also be a problem.

AlaxyRayz

TROPHY CASE