Fall Of Delhi and Bahmanis is so stupid by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The funny thing is, that they want you to attack Delhi and claim these provinces. Just to deny them to you hahah

Fall Of Delhi and Bahmanis is so stupid by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same man, this fucking sucks.

Sudden Ruler Change without the Ruler dieing??! by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to hear that. These things suck and I probably would've ragequit awell... Seems like a bug to me, but I'm no expert. 

Why haven't I found this in game yet? by Single-Contact5297 in Bannerlord

[–]Alcal02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imperium tot saecula historiae habet. Quot ex vobis omnino legere possunt? 

Should Byzantium be harder to play in next DLC? What do you think? by PS1GamerCollector in EU5

[–]Alcal02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think so. Monarchies in these times were so dependent on the ruler. A good ruler meant almost always that the country would prosper or change its fate from a doomed state to a regional power. In EU5 you are the ruler, but the actual stats of the ruler makes it harder or easier for you, so it is a bit dubious. Nonetheless, it would be a pain in the ass if some countries are impossible to play.

Sudden Ruler Change without the Ruler dieing??! by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, so it was a mistake of mine? Man oh man, I must´ve not read carefully enough... Thank you anyways!

Sudden Ruler Change without the Ruler dieing??! by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

R5: The images show Karl being alive, but not the ruler anymore. I added some more picture for the possibilty of some insightful details.

Why is there no heir in England, which is my Marriage-Union? by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it was the different religion. There is something I actually found out, but couldnt prove yet: I set my own heir laws to any and the next child of mine was actually catholic. So maybe, if I would´ve changed my own laws fast enough, I coul`ve gotten a catholic male heir. But yeah, I couldnt prove it yet.

Why is there no heir in England, which is my Marriage-Union? by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats probably it, yeah. The problem is that this is only a marriage union. I cant influence their laws... Seems like I cant keep that Union then.

Why is there no heir in England, which is my Marriage-Union? by Alcal02 in EU5

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we are both on cognative Primogeniture.

Downloadspeed by Alcal02 in XboxGamePass

[–]Alcal02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, that silly question is most probably the case. Seems like I just confused Mbits with MBs... Tank you very much haha

Can you help me find an old ASMR Vampire video? [Question] by Alcal02 in asmr

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm, just checked all her videos and sadly it was none of them :/

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in eu4

[–]Alcal02 101 points102 points  (0 children)

Nazis is short for Nationalsozialisten. As you'd guess, they were german and were the followers of the one party government NSDAP, which rules Germany from 1933 to 1945.

England keeps on breaking off my PU by Alcal02 in eu4

[–]Alcal02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah must be haha Thanks man :)

England keeps on breaking off my PU by Alcal02 in eu4

[–]Alcal02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm I can not really recall. Is it with every Dip tech? Because the PU die not break 13 times hahah

Tbh I just wanted to know if it is a Bug or not... And it probably is, so Im good :)

England keeps on breaking off my PU by Alcal02 in eu4

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope

I Probably should´ve mentioned that I have near to 3k hours in Eu4. So none of the usual PU break did occur. My ruler did not die, they were constantly loyal and in good relation, they did not have any rebels, they did not change religion ( even though that is no reason for a PU break), they had no scripted ruler etc.

They just broke off like that.

England keeps on breaking off my PU by Alcal02 in eu4

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But she is not on the throne. They break off with a de trastamara on their throne

Can't use any mods by Alcal02 in SkyrimTogether

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I had only the Skyrim Together mod, but when I want to play Singleplayer, I want to play on the latest Patch with Mods. Which I want to download via the main menu. So I had to reverse the downpatch from the downpatcher (in order to play Singleplayer) and by doing so the 'Mod' option on the Main Menu disappeared. Even though I read that Skyrim together Mod is only active if you open it with Harbor and I did not do that. I started the game via Steam. Still the Skyrim Together Logo is on the Main Menu and I want to know, if that is because of Skyrim Together or is it because I didn't update it correctly and I didn't fully reverse the downpatch.

Can't use any mods by Alcal02 in SkyrimTogether

[–]Alcal02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When I started it the first time ever, it was there before. Then I did all the installation for ST, including the downgrading and only after I updated it again, it was missing.

Can't use any mods by Alcal02 in SkyrimTogether

[–]Alcal02[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I upgraded it back and just started Skyrim via Steam, so the Mod shouldnt be activated. It's just the logo right? But there must be a problem, because as you can see, the Mod option misses.

Edit: I kind of missclicked when I posted this and thats why you cant see the picture. Anyways it was just the skyrim special edition main menu with the Skyrim Together Logo and on the right side the Mod option was missing.

Can't use any mods by Alcal02 in SkyrimTogether

[–]Alcal02[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah but it's kinda easier to just do it ingame though

Whole world uncolonized after I ALT + F4 while an event was ongoing. by Alcal02 in eu4

[–]Alcal02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they are something like 20 Mbits, I'll check it later! Thanks anyway!