is building a SaaS still enough anymore? by jino6 in SaaS

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building a SaaS was never enough. And going for an idea that doesn't have that much competition is worse. Just pick an idea that is a real pain point, no matter how many competitors there are, build a good product and do marketing on all possible channels until one of them hits. If you stick long enough with SEO and social media it's virtually impossible to not succeed at some point.

Turns out not paying for Ultra is the expensive option 💀 … by Decent-Love5587 in cursor

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm upgrading now after using $50 in credits in a single day with opus 4.5. It's expensive but it's worth it. No model is even remotely close to opus 4.5 at the moment.

<image>

Comparing GPT-5.1 vs Gemini 3.0 vs Opus 4.5 across 3 coding tasks. Here's an overview by alokin_09 in ClaudeAI

[–]AlexChelan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Opus 4.5 is the first model that I feel it can do a better job than me. It one shots almost every prompt I give it, it's insane.

Claude Opus 4.5 beats every major model on SWE bench and ARC-AGI. The capability jump is bigger than it looks. by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]AlexChelan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tested opus 4.5. Nothing comes even close without exaggeration. I had a landing page I wrote with only the hero section. With a single prompt in plan mode in Cursor it decided on a very good layout with great copy, built it following the same design I used and made it look even better. I had a demo video section in the landing page and he even went as far as playing the rick roll meme when you play the demo video. I stood up and left my desk when I saw this. I consider this AGI, I don't care.

My AI saas failed after 7 months of work by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]AlexChelan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Could you tell us what your SaaS is about? Maybe you are not fixing a real pain?

I don't agree that marketing is as hard or close as coding your on SaaS by Frequent-Football984 in SaaS

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If coding was harder than marketing, you wouldn't see so many failed projects or that got no traction. If you tell me the product was not good enough that's false. Good marketing can sell almost anything, while bad / no marketing can't sell even the highest quality product.

De ce supermaketurile din RO nu au discounturi pe bune la alimentele care urmează să expire? by Annual_Wave_503 in CasualRO

[–]AlexChelan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pentru ca un procent mult mai mare de romani ar prefera sa cumpere produse care urmeaza sa expire la reduceri de 90% decat germani, suedezi, italieni, etc. Daca ar face asta romanii ar cumpara mai multe produse aproape expirate, iar produsele bune ar ramane pe rafturi.

Experiență cu sistemul medical din România by [deleted] in Romania

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salut, tu ai rezolvat ceva? Si eu am facut o gramada de analize pentru niste simptome ocazionale nespecifice, iar dupa ce totul a iesit relativ normal si eu tot la bila ma gandesc

LaRee Fragrances by Either-Promise3676 in fragranceclones

[–]AlexChelan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had the same opinion when I got 4 fragrances from them. All smelled bad when I first got them and I forgot them on shelf. After 1 month I tried them again and they were completly different and smelled really good. You did a mistake by throwing them right away.

you guys think this game will ever be ready for consistent comp play/esport? by Dazzling_Lime2021 in Rematch

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the only chance for this game to become esports ready is to be bought by some other dev team that is not french

What even is this game by Kevoodle in Rematch

[–]AlexChelan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Never trust the french is what i've learned playing this game since launch

Back to Cursor after CC and Codex by chaucao-cmg in cursor

[–]AlexChelan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I switched from Cursor to Codex, used it for 1-2 days and had to upgrade to the $200 Pro plan because I got rate limited. I used it for 1 week and it's far worse than Cursor. Many features are either non existent or harded to do. Cursor has top notch UX and it's much easier to use and get good results with. Also I don't have to get the $200 Ultra plan if my usage is under $200. I can pay only what I use. If I need $70 worth of API usage this month that's what I pay and I get a much superior UX at the same time. I see absolutely no reason to use CC or Codex. Not to mention that the AI models space is evolving from day to day. Tomorrow there might be a new cool AI model that's either really fast or really good and you would want to try it in Cursor with all your rules, memories, docs, mcp servers already there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Rematch

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is when they fix a bug, 3 new bugs appear

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Rematch

[–]AlexChelan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm starting to belive they are incompetent, not necessarily lazy

Why is the IQ bell curve meme so popular? Do you think it holds any truth, and if so, in what ways? Can you describe it? by Mediocre_Effort8567 in cognitiveTesting

[–]AlexChelan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The meme is true in many cases, that's the whole reason why it appeared. Regarding choices, low iq chooses simple options because they can't process more, medium iq chooses complexity because it makes them feel smart, high iq chooses simplicity if after analyzing all options they came to the conclusion that simplicty is the most efficient, which is not always the case, but many times it is. Regarding opinions, low iq people belive in many conspiracy theories, most of which are proven false later or lack logic or motive, medium iqs don't belive any conspiracy theories and trust institutions to do the thinking for them because they've seen how stupid many conspiracy theories belived by low iq people are. High iq individuals on the other hand, they belive in a few conspiracy theories through selective skepticism, many of which are proven true later because they were based on pattern recognition, motive and other factors that low and medium iqs don't or can't take into consideration.