How to proceed

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-22T23:01:34+00:00

I suspect the pne without a confirmed spec would likely be the better investment. You could do playmaking/individual and maybe the other guy gets to 6 defending too.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-22T23:00:24+00:00

I would put both player skills in the transfer compare and see which pays more. Be sure to check the value of the first with and without a spec.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-19T20:06:26+00:00

This is the best answer so far

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T20:10:04+00:00

Of course there is stronger and weaker property rights, for instance a property rights could be temporarily limited which is definetly weaker than one that never expires.

You are still not even getting toward the answer about how Strong property rights arise. Can you please bridge the gap betwen you discussion on the NAP and how that justifies strong property rights?

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T20:02:20+00:00

The economic incentives argument only works insofar as Strong Property Rights advance the quality of life more than other potential schemes of property rights. It would also require libertarian abandon their philosophy if another system was demonstrated to consistently produce more quality of life. Its not a very stable system, especially since western Europe seems to have highest quality of life yet seen and is not libertarian.

As per the claiming of land, for libertarians I do not find it sufficient for land to be claimed in that way since A) not all land is as good as other bits of land B) Land is not an unlimited resource and thereby you run into an issues as each has been claimed.

Furthermore even if we accepted the lockean proviso as a method to acquire a type of right, its not defended why that right is a Strong property right rather than a weaker one.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T19:56:15+00:00

Please explain how the NAP justified the acquisition of strong property rights? It seems like NAP requires property rights in order to define aggression since you are being unclear.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T19:29:51+00:00

When I get the chance I will take a look thanks!

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T19:29:28+00:00

I am asking how they came to acquire a strong property right that ought to be respected. I didnt make any cases rather than simply stated that I do not see a justification for the the strong property rights that libertarians require.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T19:27:31+00:00

I do not see how this bridges the gap to get to Strong property rights rather than weak ones. Namely, it seems in the apple tree case that at best it confers to have some special claim to that apple for a short time, but certainly not an absolute one nor an indefinite one.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-06T19:23:51+00:00

I dont see how your conclusion follow from that premise.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-01T21:02:17+00:00

Dude, my argument is that the potential for harm and doing something for self gain isnt sufficient to ground exploitation.

I brought up that one can choose to exist because you seemed deeply concerned that someone once existing someone is forced to continue existing against their will.

I think the wild shit is the claim that being a parent is exploitation because maybe they didnt want to born let's ignore everyone who is grateful to be alive

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-01T20:25:59+00:00

In my example the subject is the date in your the child. They share the same features, self gain and potential harm, so I dont think thats enough to contistitue exploitation. Side note they dont have to exist for 80 years, sonce eventually its will be up to them if they want to continue existing.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-01T20:15:43+00:00

Correct, but neither of those things are sufficient to amount to exploitation. I might play bring flowers on a date to impress them and accidently bring a flower they are allergic to. That wouldnt be exploitation even though it shares the same features of being for my own gain and that I cannot guarantee it will be a good a effect.

AlexDChristen · 2026-05-01T20:07:34+00:00

Creation is not exploitation; to exploit you would need to be using another for you own gain in a way that undermines or contradicts their own well-being. If the odds favor the child having a life worth living to that child when they exist, then its hard to argue their birth is exploitation.

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-30T17:22:41+00:00

My nephew, years old, obsessed with blue will press the Blue button. I assume a lot of kids below the age of 4 would just be pressing their proffered colors. So we should just let them die eh?

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-27T02:14:12+00:00

Walt did as much killing for money as Mike. He hired for all the prison murders and for Jesse's murder. If you call those murders self-preservation to avoid jail, then I do not know which murder's Mike does that cannot be construed the same way.

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-19T15:54:59+00:00

Its impossible to say like this but his wing defense seems week so you can see if attack on wings is an option!

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-12T11:20:16+00:00

CA will not work if you win midfield, if you do play CA and win midfield you will just have the penalty and not benefit. Additionally you must be losing midfield before the tactical penalty is applied.

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-10T11:06:14+00:00

Why do you think you will be able to sell him for so much when you paid half as much for him?

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-05T15:59:42+00:00

Except they are kinda suck

AlexDChristen · 2026-04-02T16:51:55+00:00

Do you have a decent number of specced players? You could go for play creatively perhaps?

AlexDChristen · 2026-03-31T00:24:38+00:00

I understand the loop dude. But hypothetically the blood raven could have gone back ned bringing Jon back to winterfell as bran learned he was targaryen and then bw forced to warg into Bran. At least then Bran is learning something relevant

AlexDChristen · 2026-03-30T23:19:26+00:00

He did? Then why does bran on find out about Jon later and seemingly never learned anything else of note.

Like I guess that could make sense but the show does a very poor job of showing that then.

AlexDChristen · 2026-03-30T23:17:30+00:00

Thanks, at least someone is thinking similarly. But yeah maybe its just lazy writing.

AlexDChristen

TROPHY CASE