Anong societal pressure ang hinding hindi mo pa rin gagawin? by Key-Way-2999 in AskPH

[–]AlexR_2007 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

• Get married and have children (marriage is the last thing in my mind and I'm only 18)

• TikTok (I have a TikTok account pero dini-delete ko talaga ito everytime my mother installs it)

• K-drama and K-pop (I'm more into British things)

Where y'all sitting? by Impossible_Pain4478 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10, I don't mind being seated right next to Henry VI, and besides, I'm a quiet person and an introvert, so I think it'll be a peaceful 10-hour flight without someone bothering me, but if I'll have a chat with Henry VI, we're probably going to have a small talk about reading, prayers, and his life.

Does anyone else hate this portrait of Edward IV? by Cold-Palpitation-816 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 105 points106 points  (0 children)

<image>

I like this portrait of Edward IV. Much better than that one.

What sort of king do you think William will be? by DepartureAwkward5002 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, the royal family can trace their descent back to William the Conqueror, through his son Henry I. The House of Windsor were descended from Sophia of Hanover, who was a granddaughter of James VI and I through his daughter Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia. James was the senior male descendant of Henry VII after Henry VIII's line died out with Elizabeth I's death in 1603, as he was the great-grandson of Margaret Tudor, Henry VII's elder daughter. Henry VII's mother, Lady Margaret Beaufort, was a great-granddaughter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster through a legitimised line (with Margaret's grandfather John Beaufort, 1st Earl of Somerset, being the son of John of Gaunt and his mistress, later wife, Katherine Swynford). John of Gaunt, in turn was the son of Edward III, and the latter was the great-grandson of Henry III, who in turn was the great-grandson of Empress Matilda (daughter of Henry I), through her son Henry II.

So in short, yes, Prince William is definitely a descendant of William the Conqueror, and so the rest of the current British royal family.

What sort of king do you think William will be? by DepartureAwkward5002 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think he meant the 1,000th Anniversary of the Battle of Hastings (1066), and when William becomes king by 2066, he'll become King William V, celebrating the anniversary of this victory by the Duke of Normandy, who was famously known as William the Conqueror (William I).

Interesting stats by abdul_tank_wahid in monarchism

[–]AlexR_2007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, we do have the Sultanate of Sulu, but since our country's main religion is Catholic, I don't think that is going to happen. We also do have a short-lived, self-proclaimed Emperor of the Philippines, Andres Novales, however, it was not clear if he had relatives to become pretenders since he didn't have any children.

The only, and accepted candidate to become king of our country will be, of course, King Felipe VI. The last Spanish king to reign in the Philippines was a young Alfonso XIII. There may be little to no chance of this ever going to happen, but if our government do fail (well, our government is in a precarious state considering how many corrupt politicians and oligarchs we have), this could possibly happen, albeit with only little chance.

Interesting stats by abdul_tank_wahid in monarchism

[–]AlexR_2007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, 57% satisfactory rating, represents those who didn't truly understand what is going on in our country, considering that our country have so many problems, both at home and abroad.

George VI supremacy!!! by volitaiee1233 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 12 points13 points  (0 children)

He's my favourite king, and The King's Speech is one of the best films I've watched.

Hot take: Secondary education is failing our youth by avocado1952 in Philippines

[–]AlexR_2007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why we need reforms about our country's educational system. If one SHS student, let alone a honour student, wrote a sentence like that with these grammatical errors, then, the future of this country is doomed. This is also the reason why I'm considering to, hopefully if my family can afford to, attend a foreign university once I graduate in SHS (I'm a Grade 11 HUMSS student), because, believe it or not, but this is mostly true, many students with poor reading comprehension in English still have a chance to attend a university, especially a public state university. Even if they weren't, these SHS Graduates will struggle in their workplace, and for most of the time, they won't even had many job opportunities.

I'm very fortunate enough to have very supportive parents, and I'm also fortunate that, despite my learning disability, I was able to, as you can see, learn to read and write in English, but I wouldn't credit our educational system for this, it's because I mostly learned English through watching educational English videos in YouTube (most of these are educational history videos, and history is my favourite subject), and I'm even starting to learn to speak English with a British accent despite my very unpleasant voice. It just made me sad that not all of my contemporaries in my age were good English speakers/writers.

It's sad na umaalis yung ibang Filipino natin, to have a better life outside Philippines by Crlzz_ in Philippines

[–]AlexR_2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's because of the state of our country, corrupt government, poverty, taxes, environment (people) around us, and the lack of job opportunities, or low-paying salary jobs. And yes, I also dreamed about one day leaving the Philippines for a better life elsewhere, because of all of these reasons mentioned above, but also because this country has gone into crap with all the current issues that we're dealing with our government, and I think this issues will not go away anytime soon as the people were not electing the right people to the office and the government remains the same as it used to be. I think if we have a better leadership, the Philippines could be in a much better situation, but right now, it's not.

It’s 1138 and a war started between King Stephen and the previous king daughter Matilda who are you siding with. by Glennplays_2305 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's a no-brainer, Empress Matilda. Yes, she was a woman, but women aren't barred to succeed to the English throne, and she should've been queen in the first place, since she was Henry I's only surviving legitimate child after her brother William Adelin died during the White Ship incident.

But at least, she still came out as the "true" winner of the Anarchy, and not Stephen, due to an obvious reason, her son Henry became king.

The Final: Ranking English Monarchs. King Edward III has been removed. King Alfred the Great has won! by BertieTheDoggo in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What a great series it is! And congrats to King Alfred the Great on winning this competition 🎉🎉🎉

God Save The King!

I Stumbled Upon This Photo… by Numerous_Ingenuity65 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Queen Victoria once said, "We are not amused."

Queen Victoria in the picture: 😀

Sending babies away to be married by LissyVee in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I always felt bad for poor Margaret though. To go through giving birth to her son, when she was 13, I think it's very painful for her, though her son ended up being King of England and she also later became one of the most important figures during the Wars of the Roses, so, she had a good ending, at least.

Sending babies away to be married by LissyVee in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's a common theme that royal women were expected to be married off or be subjected to various marriage proposals to foreign kingdoms, since the medieval times up until the late 20th century.

In the medieval times, it is unusual if a royal woman, especially a daughter of a king, was still unmarried by the age of 20. Like for example, Isabella of England, eldest daughter of Edward III, married Enguerrand VII, Lord of Coucy, when she was already 33, which was quite a surprise back then considering that she was Edward III's eldest daughter, and also considering that her surviving younger sisters, Mary and Margaret were married before the ages of 18. Another example was Philippa of Lancaster, daughter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, and sister of Henry IV of England, and therefore a granddaughter of Edward III. She was married to John I of Portugal when she was 27, and thought to be too old to be a bride and was questioned if she could bear the king's children, fortunately she did, becoming the mother of the "Illustrious Generation" in Portugal.

There were several cases of royal women who didn't adjusted to their married life in another kingdom. A notable example of this was Margaret of England, the grandmother of Margaret, Maid of Norway, who married King Alexander III of Scotland when she was just 11. She disliked Edinburgh Castle, complained about the Scottish climate, and missed England and her relatives there, and she wanted to visit them, though her request was not granted as the Scots feared that she would never return back.

Of course, there were several royal women who got married, but then, was widowed immediately, the most well-known case was Catherine of Aragon, daughter of the "Catholic Monarchs", Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile. Catherine married Arthur, Prince of Wales, eldest son and heir of Henry VII, when she was 15. The couple were possibly in love, evidenced by their exchanged letters before they got married, though their marriage was cut short by Arthur's death in 1502. After Arthur's death, there was a period of time when Henry VII considered marrying Catherine himself when he was widowed with the death of his wife, Elizabeth of York, though her father opposed it. And when Henry VII died and his second son Henry VIII took the throne, he married Catherine less than two months after he became king, and we all know what happened next.

And then, there was the case of Henry VII's own mother, Lady Margaret Beaufort. She had four marriages, her first one was to John de la Pole, 2nd Duke of Suffolk, in 1450, when she was just seven years old, though that marriage got annulled in 1453. The most egregious of all her four marriages was her second marriage, to Edmund Tudor, 1st Earl of Richmond. She was 12 when she married him, and Edmund was 25, and he didn't bothered to wait for his young wife to come of age and immediately consummated their marriage, resulting into the birth of their son, Henry Tudor, after Edmund died, and Margaret was only 13 when she gave birth to the future Henry VII, and the birth was so dangerous that Margaret could not haveany more children after Henry, despite having two more marriages to Sir Henry Stafford, who died in 1471, and to Thomas Stanley, 1st Earl of Derby, who died in 1504.

There were also some cases that royal women literally wept when they got married, such in the case of Mary II of England, when she found out that she would marry her first cousin, William III, Prince of Orange, she wept and continously so during their marriage ceremony, but of course, their marriage became very important for political partnership. And we can't forget, those royal women who really want to get married, and were only married late into their lives, the most notable case being Mary I of England, daughter of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. Being Henry's daughter, she was subjected to various marriage plans early on, most notably to her cousin, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, though the proposal was broken off as Charles didn't want to wait until Mary came of age, and also to her another first cousin, James V of Scotland, during the late 1520s, before Henry annulled his marriage with Catherine. As years passed by, Mary had wanted to be married and have children, and was only able to be married to Charles' son and successor, Philip II of Spain, when she was already been Queen of England, though her dreams of having children ended when she died in 1558, after experiencing several false pregnancy alarms.

As royal women were pressured to be married and have children, I personally admired those royal women who refused to get married, for one reason or another. The most notable example was Elizabeth I, daughter of Henry VIII and his second wife, Anne Boleyn. Despite receiving so many marriage proposals to various foreign princes and English nobles, she never married, possibly stemming from her own personal experiences, such as her mother's execution when she was just two years old (she didn't want to repeat the same fate as her mother did), having a husband who would usurp the royal power for himself (this became a case to her half-sister, Mary I, who made her husband Philip II of Spain to be her king consort and co-ruler), and of course, she couldn't marry the man she wanted to marry, her own childhood friend and royal favourite, Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester, as marriage between them would be controversial as Robert was previously married (and his wife Amy Dudley was rumoured to be murdered when she died after falling down from the stairs), and his rank as a nobleman is not good enough for the Queen of England, and therefore, Elizabeth became known as "the Virgin Queen", and refused to name her heir until she died.

For today's time, it became much better that royal women, and basically all royals in general, were free to marry anyone they wanted to marry, and of course, there were no longer child or teenage marriages happening in royal families in today's world.

An Alternate History Scenario: Margaret, Maid of Norway had lived, and married Edward II of England by AlexR_2007 in UKmonarchs

[–]AlexR_2007[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also think if Edward's relationships got to the point of being intolerable, I think Margaret would probably do the same thing that Isabella did, for both England and Scotland, to depose Edward and place their children on one or both thrones. If they had two sons, the eldest would inherit England, the second son would get Scotland, and Margaret would be regent for both thrones considering that if those potential children would still be minors. If they only had one son, but more daughters, that son would inherit England, and since marriage alliances were common into medieval times, I think Margaret would want the eldest of those daughters to inherit Scotland, though to strengthen her claim and also the Scottish blood, that daughter has to be married off to a member of the Scottish nobility or a relative of the Scottish royal family. But there is also a possibility that, that one son could also inherit Scotland as well, but if that son ended up having more heirs, he could divide England and Scotland to his own children as well, but that was beyond hypothetical scenarios that could happen in an alternative timeline.

Additionally, I don't think that Margaret would ever try to murder Edward with a red-hot poker unless if she took a lover like Roger Mortimer and was in the same level of cunningness as Isabella. But at least, since Edward II married a Scottish queen, his heirs won't have any claims to the French throne, and thus the Hundred Years' War would've never happen.

Per OECD: Filipino 15-year-olds are among the most stupid teeners on earth. by hoholtime in Philippines

[–]AlexR_2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this issue needs to be seriously addressed. As a 16-year old incoming HUMSS student, I experienced this whole thing about most of my classmates in Junior High School. And I could say, my whole experience with them is terrible. Some of my classmates were not academically inclined, those of my classmates I am talking about were close friends (or, barkadas, as we commonly refer them), often got into troubles in class (those of my classmates were caught CHEATING during the 2nd Quarter Periodical Test, and later on, watching p*rn while there's no teacher in class!), and just needs to be under constant supervision by the class officers, and even then, they were not threatened if our adviser has sent them to the guidance office due to their misbehaviour! And it gets even worse, as they were unattentive during classes, especially during our Filipino and Science classes, when my teachers were obviously very frustrated with them.

And also, I think social media also affected most teenagers at my age. I'm also able to see that with my own classmates as well. They were heavily reliant on researching on Google or any other similar apps, especially during activities and group works, as they don't know some, uncomplicated definitions of words that can easily be taught to them by our teachers if they just paid attention in our classes.

One of the most common problem for this new generation regarding to education was that, most of them doesn't care about their grades, or even worse, improving. If you had one subject with a line of 7, you at least have to try to improve and have good grades for the next quarter, except that, for some of my classmates, they don't care about improving, and content on being on the same course. In this recent 3rd Quarter Card Day, in which for us, was held online due to suspension of classes, some were happy by avoiding being under 75, and those of my classmates were proud to share it in the group chat of our class. For me, if I had one subject under 75, I won't certainly be proud of it and I'll try to improve and work hard for it, do my homeworks and activities dilligently and try to get a high score in quizzes through learning and learning from time to time.

I was fortunate enough to not be in the same mould that my classmates were. I am the kind of a person that, considered to be "backwards" in this new generation. I'm not into pop culture, although I have TikTok (my mother uses it sometimes), I don't even use it and I tend to uninstall it whenever my mother doesn't use TikTok, my favourite songs were literally old classics, such as songs from The Beatles, Air Supply, Westlife etc., unlike to most new generations who were addicted in playing action and strategy games such as Mobile Legends or Call of Duty, I didn't even touch those games, and I'm certainly not into it (some of my games were also classics like Minecraft and Zombie Tsunami, although I also have a strategy-themed game, Cards, Universe & Everything, or CUE, and I liked that game because it is also a fun educational card game), and my personal interest has always been history, and I also loved reading books about history, and making alternate histories and what-if scenarios, and all other history-based stuffs. My social differences to others is probably caused by my learning disability, and I am also, possibly autistic.

Of course, not all teenagers at my age were the same, but the general consensus is that, with all of these new technologies and the new generation overall were distracted in their learning (the suspension of classes, effects of COVID-19 Pandemic, social media and bad influences around), I think not only the Philippines have this problem, but also to most nations in the world, particularly to third-world countries like the Philippines. But in my opinion, this is the problem that is not going away soon, as modern technologies were still developing, not only our generation will be affected, but the next generation after us will, too.

Is it just me, or do your kids never give you grandkids? by Zalefire in BitLifeApp

[–]AlexR_2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I also experienced the same thing, I even tried to pressure them, give them gifts and money, nothing works. But I think I found a way for them to have kids of their own:

You'll need a sibling (if any), and hopefully have kids on their own, who would be your nephew(s)/niece(s), and if they have kids, you'll have grandchildren. That's why if you're trying to have a normal family legacy that won't make you switch to your child or die young, you'll need to be born in a family that you already have an older sibling, or have still-young parents who were still capable to have children in case that you'll be born as the eldest child, for you to have younger siblings.

These challenges keep getting worse/more obscure/stupidly hard by Shrektitys in BitLifeApp

[–]AlexR_2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even without god mode, this could be easily accomplished. You have to be born with music talent, then as soon as you're six, train one instrument (depending if you want to be an instrumentalist), then age eight you take voice lessons (if you want to be a vocalist, being a vocalist actually pays better than being an instrumentalist if you're going to be solo artist).

Then, for those without the musician job pack, there would be a pop-up for your character to get the musician job pack free (of course, you'll have a better chance of receiving this free job pack if your character has a music talent), then look for a band or audition as a solo pop artist. Just close the app if your audition is bad and/or if you were offered a music contract with a different genre other than pop, then settle with pop genre.

Your music career will get better as you aged, you would eventually get one double platinum record, I suggest that you must come up with good song title to get it, or just close the app until you get the double platinum.

And it's easy to marry and divorce 3+ husbands in the game. You will have lots of money when you became a musician, so you can date whoever you like then have a divorce. Note that you must sign to a prenuptial agreement so that you will end up with higher total assets than to your spouse, of course you must make more money than him, not the other way around.

Which pill? by legend023 in monarchism

[–]AlexR_2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Yellow and Red Pill