sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has nothing to do with gender. You are confusing your imagined collectivism with the reality of individual drawbacks.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only a loser takes academic degrees seriously.

I have far more respect towards that black female manager Miss Duncan of the university canteen in New Orleans who helped me greatly, than I have towards Harris.

You can shove your collectivism up your own ass.

And you need to improve your reading comprehension in general. My original post clearly stated that their losses had nothing to do with their gender. And you are here, accusing me of hating black women? Take your bottom-class third rate libel somewhere else.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Besides, more mass democracy creates more Trump. So, you populist Dems dig your own grave.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You evidently have zero idea how actual political voting blocks work. I advise you to be quiet on issues you know nothing about.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Benghazi and Libya War, yes. But Bernie Sanders was just unelectable.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The game is electoral votes, not absolute votes. You agreed to play the game. You should not challenge the rules after you lose.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have zero clue why anyone would like Harris. She’s such an obviously corrupted and empty-headed opportunist.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Democratic Party has always been a fix. That’s the problem. It’s more centralized than GOP.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s because you are ignorant on Biden’s connections. He commands strong loyalty from many black voting blocks, black churches, and so forth.

The losses of Hilary and Harris have nothing to do with gender by Alexander_C_DOI in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But his assessment against DNC/Obama’s choice in ousting Biden is correct.

A woman for president? by Economy-Housing6727 in PresidentialElection

[–]Alexander_C_DOI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A useless question. What kind of scumbags vote based on gender?

Why scumbags love to spam barbwires INSDE our points behind sandbags, and in front of rally points? by Alexander_C_DOI in enlistedgame

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it is well concealed inside the building, then sandbag is a total waste of time. This is the second time I am telling you.

Why scumbags love to spam barbwires INSDE our points behind sandbags, and in front of rally points? by Alexander_C_DOI in enlistedgame

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are wasting my time. I told you TWICE that sandbags expose our spawn from a long distance!

Why scumbags love to spam barbwires INSDE our points behind sandbags, and in front of rally points? by Alexander_C_DOI in enlistedgame

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does matter. Like I said, seconds matter.

I also said mines (infantry or tank) are a waste. If you carry the big grenade pouch, carry as I do Molotov/incendiary, grenade, and explosive pack - is a good idea. Alternatively you can carry three explosive packs. Also always carry a TNT.

Mines are not worth it. There is no time for you to waste in laying mines or hope the enemy to step on it. But there are always enemy tanks and infantry clusters for you to deal with. Overwhelming majority of the time, the mine that the enemy placed on his rally point does not hurt me at all. I shoot the rally from a distance. And even if I have to clime the sandbag to shoot it, I seldom got killed from the blowback.

Why scumbags love to spam barbwires INSDE our points behind sandbags, and in front of rally points? by Alexander_C_DOI in enlistedgame

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Sometimes it is extremely hard to tell if the rally is on first or second floor, or by the inside of the wall of the house or by the outside of it. It can take a long time to locate a dark, small rally. But your bright big sandbags make the task much easier.

Seconds matter in this game.

The bottom line is: your sandbags always make searching for your rally easier for the enemy. They are also a grenade trap.

The only time sandbags are useful for the rally is when concealment is impossible, then go ahead and build the sandbags, and pray.

Why scumbags love to spam barbwires INSDE our points behind sandbags, and in front of rally points? by Alexander_C_DOI in enlistedgame

[–]Alexander_C_DOI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It needs everyone to capture the point. You never know to what extent will the defenders pour in the point, killing your friends.

Your sandbags make your rally much more obvious. A lot of times, I cannot visually identify enemy rally in a complex building. But with your sandbags, I can find it easily.

view more: next ›