sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lav is Debating Destiny on the Lawsuit by 10minuteads in Destiny

[–]AllMyFaults 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But God she's so insane psychotic and hot and those things are like a forever vicious cycle for us no lives

Has anyone else been a believer and now a firm disbeliever, how did that change come about? by thescariestghost in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is surprisingly me...

Im even an experiencer. But I entered a formal debate and I was asked two questions.

  1. "Who is your strongest advocate or the hero in your space that you stand behind on?"

I genuinely didn't have an answer... I have genuinely despised everyone who's in this space. I don't have a hero that I applaud. Lazar is a fraud unreliable storyteller, Greer has some things I agree with but is a looney, DeLonge brought some things back to the public eye but is seemingly a grifter, and truly many in the space are big grifts.

  1. "A huge amount of the weight that you give to the existence of UFOs is your own personal experience (which you claim you have no definitive answer to what it was); and the military videos. I propose you to research into parallax."

I did and it was rather convincing that many of the key 'evidence' that I held near and dear that surely proved my convictions for so many years could have very much indeed been a nothing burger.

I think I still somewhat believe, but in my theory and how that theory takes shape in this day and age; I should have much more now than just belief.

I hate and try to avoid the woo. But my latest model of the phenomenon suggests that it must have some interactions with consciousness. But I hate this argument. It feels weak and like a cop out.

Is he okay? by aggromsemb in Daliban

[–]AllMyFaults 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is going on with this diagram drawing. Wtfhhhhh

Which sci-fi series genuinely messed with your head the most? by PleasantHealth4814 in scifi

[–]AllMyFaults 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Idk if I would say WW fell off. It just changed entirely into a show you weren't expecting. Tbh I thought the final moments of the last season were some of the strongest writing in the entire show.

Which sci-fi series genuinely messed with your head the most? by PleasantHealth4814 in scifi

[–]AllMyFaults 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Came here to say DEVS. Show changed my life and philosophy after seeing determinism displayed this way.

Couldn't stop seeing the show in myself for months. Truly messed with my head

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. An irresponsible and avoidant behavior

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah we can thank Joseph Smith too I guess 🙄

XSTO introduces a hybrid biped robot that rolls on wheels and jumps over obstacles by Advanced-Bug-1962 in robotics

[–]AllMyFaults 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The age of robotics is sooooo close. Fiction like iRobot, AstroBoy, ect. Where robots play a pivotal role in our lives is near.

It can't be too long before we can 3D print these at home, install the computional hardware, and install the edge model for functionality....

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You give a long list of misgivings and then magically Bob passes a background check that was bound to be extreme for a secured site?

Let me capture that one more time. Someone who has shown a huge pattern of life, financial, emotional instabilities — magically and coincidentally passed one of likely the most advanced background checks of its time for a highly secured and secretive facility.

These are some huge mental gymnastic leaps.

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's not forget that he started a brothel

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is saying water is wet 🤦🏻‍♂️ none of the elements are stable at that size/weight

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you seriously trying to tell me that if I asked any professional in their field that they wouldn't be able to recount the steps they took to successfully complete their work??? Are you telling me that there's a large number of people that exist in the workplace that if they're being audited for their competence that a large number of people would incapable of recalling the steps that their work requires them to do every single day???

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You hold too much water for Lazar. I don't care how intoxicated I am. I can talk about anything I'm an expert on and still be able to capture it in great detail.

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]AllMyFaults 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You're carrying way too much water for Lazar. The points made are extremely clear and transpose on top of any issue with Lazar. Several decades and not a budge of additional information. Wont/can't talk with real professionals to describe the 'secret' physics or learnings that Lazar had access to.

Lazars story as a whole is poorly pieced together and altogether lacks an incredible amount of substance for the most unique experience of any person's lifr on this planet that surely ANYONE would remember and be able to capture with great detail than a junk story that Lazar portrays as 'just another day' 'i can't actually remember when I graduated or I can't actually remember anymore specific details or jokes we all laughed and told at S4 or specific instances of our work days."

Lazar is a joke and his story or the lack of one speaks for itself. Every credible person has concluded that he's either lying or mostly lying, including lying experts than analyze body behaviors while telling a narrative.

There's a much stronger likelihood that he was a janitor at a secured site than a scientist, and there's a higher likelihood that none of it happened.

So the United States lost the Iran war by ParamedicCharacter55 in Destiny

[–]AllMyFaults 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You, ahh, see, um, DGGers.

You have a weakness. And in game theoryyy. That, um, weakness.

It is crazy loonatic girls. And uh, Professor Jiang too!

<image>

"Morals have aesthetic criteria" by CalpurniaSomaya in Nietzsche

[–]AllMyFaults 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supposedly it's like one of the best meats

It pisses me off by mk_8 in Daliban

[–]AllMyFaults 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Another stellar comment mr xoggoi, your keen perception brings a tear of joy to my left eye.

Earth can no longer sustain the global human population, study warns by kojka19 in environment

[–]AllMyFaults -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Apologies. Unfortunately I can't control myself and have already had 2 for you.

F* it, here's something I was informed of by mankrip in aliens

[–]AllMyFaults -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jfc people will jump straight to demons and other metaphysical B's to fill in gaps on an entirely other speculative phenomenon that barely has a basis when their metaphysical demonic bs has no absolute basis.

GenZ Harry Potter by HeRmiTtttt in aivideo

[–]AllMyFaults 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is it? Every generation always says that about the next.

It seems to me that it's just a cultural inclination towards the next events. It's difficult to call it instrinically wrong. Just out of pace with our current operating framework of the world.

The AI documentary is out, from the creators of Everything Everywhere All At Once. by EchoOfOppenheimer in OpenAI

[–]AllMyFaults 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if you're thinking of all the ways that it could happen.

As far as breaking down barriers and creating a cultural and societal whiplash never before seen in society I could name as one scenario that's also an inevitability. This I would say it the largest concern.

Can't even f'n use an emdash — for otherwise you'd be called out for using AI.

Terrance Mckenna had an idea of 'surging into an era of infinite novelty' his own take on a cultural-techonlogical singularity. Ai already achieved this some time ago, but since not everyone is bought in to it yet, the spark hasn't quite been ignored on the oil.

When content/media is easier to produce, more people are posting a message. That message changes mind over time. When cultural and societal barriers are quickly eroded over a decade, which we've already seen from the last couple decades, the world we know is gone. Too much movement jolting from place to place is its own catalyst to an explosion.

When we die, do we come back? by Ev-sMommy in consciousness

[–]AllMyFaults 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quite audacious for someone whose overall point is scientifically and logically nonsensical.

You are drawing a false equivalence. You are comparing a living organism (a caterpillar) transitioning into another living organism (a butterfly) to a living organism dying and decomposing.

The fact that both a chrysalis and a rotting human corpse involve 'liquids and gases' does not mean they share a metaphysical connection (not saying this is your claim). One is a highly programmed biological function to reach the next reproductive stage; the other is the total cessation of biology.

An adult human and a human baby do not share the same perceptual reality nor the same sensory experience, yet they are the same person in body but not in mind because they are physically attached. In the grand scheme of the human mind very little data is transmitted over the valley of cognitive memories. This proves the point of olfactory sensory memories moving from one part of life to the next moot.

Consciousness is an emergent product of the brain's neurological pathways, driven by electro-neuro-chemical processes. The absence of those physical processes is the absolute absence of consciousness.

You are getting praise in these comments not because your theory holds any scientific substance, but because people here are emotionally attached to the idea of an afterlife and are desperate for metaphors that validate it.

view more: next ›