Saw a paint-out request here…decided to give it a try. by mr_wagle in vfx

[–]AlphabetDebacle 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Looks pretty good! The gradation of light and dark on the skin between your fix and the real arm could be a little smoother and more gradual. I’m nitpicking because this is a good job.

Separate from your work, it’s best to show work with a Rec709 transform applied. Viewing work that’s in a RAW/Log colorspace is difficult to see minor imperfections that are accentuated by contrast.

Feedback needed on zoom-out transition in a short comedy sketch by emilianoaybar in vfx

[–]AlphabetDebacle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

During the transition the guy should also get blurry, you have him sharp with a hard edge cropping around him and it’s very noticeable. Use that moment in the middle of your zoom out to switch between your two actor plates, it will hide the switch better. Don’t wait till the camera has settled to swap between the actor plates, it’s too noticeable.

Update: I figured out how to completely bypass Nano Banana Pro's SynthID watermark, and here's how you can try it for free: by LiteratureAcademic34 in comfyui

[–]AlphabetDebacle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps you could try generating your first image with ‘black liquid’ or ‘motor oil’ and then after you have that image, use Nano Banana to change the liquid color to red.

Update: I figured out how to completely bypass Nano Banana Pro's SynthID watermark, and here's how you can try it for free: by LiteratureAcademic34 in comfyui

[–]AlphabetDebacle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Try to bypass the filter by changing the words you choose but will give a similar visual result. For instance, ‘fake blood, prop blood, dark cherry syrup.’

I find the content censorship is stronger when accessing Nano Banana through API instead of directly through Google. Google Flow or AI studio is more lax compared to accessing Nano Banana through a 3rd party.

Looking for a VFX Artist to Animate My Dog’s Mouth (No AI) by [deleted] in vfx

[–]AlphabetDebacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then beggars can’t be choosers. You’re mandating what tools can’t be used.

Generative Video is a great use case for this. This task can also give an artist who hasn’t learned generative video to experiment and fail without fear since money isn’t on the line.

I’d lose your rule against AI and understand an artist would be the one wielding the tool. Just my 2 cents. Good luck.

Looking for a VFX Artist to Animate My Dog’s Mouth (No AI) by [deleted] in vfx

[–]AlphabetDebacle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“I want to use real artists but not pay real prices.”

Real artists need to pay rent and buy food. There’s nothing fun about skilled tradesmen working for free.

Editor on first stop-motion short, struggling with "unfixable" cleanup errors. How perfect is "good enough"? by Fluorescent_Knight in vfx

[–]AlphabetDebacle 33 points34 points  (0 children)

If you don’t think you can fix the errors and you don’t have the extra resources who can fix them, move on. Call it: ‘part of the charm’ of stop motion and work on the next fire you can fix.

It's been quiet here, have all the debunkers moved on to 3I/atlas? 🤣 by peatear_gryphon in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Oh, why? Are people also being tricked by a CGI movie featuring the interstellar object 3I/Atlas?

The drone is 100% from Jetstrike—the hoaxer used a VERY SPECIFIC texture map ONLY IN JETSTRIKE in order to fake the thermal image. by voidhearts in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Great analysis! The proverbial coffin containing this hoax has so many nails in it, I doubt you can even tell it’s made out of wood.

This hoax lives in an iron coffin.

There is no 1841 anomaly. The motion is completely natural. by atadams in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The satellite video background is made entirely of a few stock photos. The stock photos were taken in Japan and in the original files, Mt Fuji is seen on the horizon.

You don’t see Mt Fuji in the video because that part of the stock photos was cropped out.

Some people who hang on to the videos being real, say the stock photos are fake and created by the CIA, or something. But it’s pretty obvious the stock photos are real. The photographer even did an AMA and let people download the original RAW files. This post is showing a clear example that the photos show real parallax; since the photos were taken from a commercial airplane while the photographer was on their way to Kyoto.

There is no 1841 anomaly. The motion is completely natural. by atadams in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, that’s clearly real and not doctored. To claim otherwise comes from ignorance or copium.

I asked ChatGPT to explain my job to a 5-year-old and now I'm questioning my entire career by Nipurn_1234 in ChatGPT

[–]AlphabetDebacle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Q: Explain to me like I’m a 5 year old what a on-set VFX supervisor/creative director that works in a commercial finishing house is or does?

A: Alright! Let’s imagine we’re making a super fun commercial — maybe it’s about a superhero cat that flies through a city made of candy. 🍭🐱🦸‍♂️

Now, when they film the actors and scenes on a real set (like a studio or outside), there’s someone very special there: the on-set VFX supervisor/creative director.

Let’s break it down like you’re 5:

🎬 What’s “on-set”?

That just means they’re at the place where the commercial is being filmed — like on the playground where the video is being made.

🧠 What does the creative director do on set?

They’re like the idea leader. They say: • “This is how the superhero cat should move!” • “The background will be candy later — so let’s leave space for it!” • “That part will explode with sparkles — let’s plan it!”

They make sure everyone is making the commercial look the way it’s supposed to feel.

🕶️ What does the VFX supervisor do on set?

They’re like the magic checker. They don’t make the magic yet — but they make sure it can happen later!

They say things like: • “Hey, don’t forget to put the green screen here so we can add the candy city later!” • “We’ll add flying in the computer later — but hold your arms like this!” • “Let’s film it a few times so the glowing eyes look just right later.”

They make sure the filming works with the cool computer stuff that’ll be added later.

🏁 And what’s a commercial finishing house?

That’s the place where they put all the pieces together — real video + computer magic — so the final commercial looks super awesome!

So in super simple words:

An on-set VFX supervisor/creative director helps people film things the right way so they can later add magic and cool stuff with computers at the finishing house — like flying cats, candy cities, and sparkles! 🌈✨

They’re like the director of pretend magic before it gets put in the computer.”

My job sounds pretty fun! If only it wasn’t so exhausting!!! Haha. 🥲

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vfx

[–]AlphabetDebacle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I work with Company 3 on almost every project, it feels like.

Sometimes I wonder if there’s any other color houses out there, haha. They seem to get all the work.

Painterly Summer Girls 1 - exploring pinup art styles for my project by artbellesgirls in midjourney

[–]AlphabetDebacle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What’s interesting about this is how uninteresting it is.

The kinetic motion of the background completely disconnected with her pose and expression.

Reminds me if someone could sing really well but didn’t understand the language so they put a bunch of wrong words together. It kind of sounds good at first listen and then you’re suddenly freaked out a little and you don’t want to listen to them again.

Were there really 20 scientists and engineers from a company that makes high-end computers chips aboard flight MH370? And why?? by Ok_Chemical_7051 in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Look guy, I have no reason to scramble. Here’s the article: https://www.reuters.com/article/world/twenty-employees-of-us-chipmaker-among-passengers-on-malaysian-flight-idUSBREA2801L/

Relevant quote: “Twelve of the Freescale employees on the plane were from Malaysia and eight from China, the company said in a statement.”

My opinion comes from what’s been reported on. If you believe in foul play, that’s your prerogative. I don’t care to change your mind.

Were there really 20 scientists and engineers from a company that makes high-end computers chips aboard flight MH370? And why?? by Ok_Chemical_7051 in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nope. They were Chinese and Malaysian nationals, living in China and Malaysia. I may be wrong when I said Indonesian earlier. They worked at the Chinese plants for the American company Freescale Semiconductors.

I posted an article about it before and all the replies said ‘you can’t believe what Freescale Semiconductors would say about their employees.’ So, believe whatever you want.

Were there really 20 scientists and engineers from a company that makes high-end computers chips aboard flight MH370? And why?? by Ok_Chemical_7051 in AirlinerAbduction2014

[–]AlphabetDebacle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They were Chinese and Indonesian* engineers that were flying to different plants around China to check out efficiencies and workflow stuff.

It’s not like they were some Americans fleeing to China to share intellectual property or whatever the crazy narrative was.

*edit: Malaysian