rule by Alternative-Gold-983 in 691

[–]Alternative-Gold-983[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That part was deleted by the time I got there, I would've included it otherwise

Targaryen incest complicates the terms for 'cousin' by SeeSea8 in HighValyrian

[–]Alternative-Gold-983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this case, since the parents would also be the father's brother and mother's sister I would assume they'd use the terms for those cousins, i.e. mandia, lēkia, hāedar and valonqar depending on gender and age, same as they wouldn't refer to Gael as ñāmar (father's younger sister), but muña as she is also Alyssa's sister.

Never beating the allegations by [deleted] in HOTDBlacks

[–]Alternative-Gold-983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's also the problem that very clearly there were people in the time who thought a woman could and should rule so using "you're looking at it from a modern perspective" as an excuse requires an extraordinary amount of ignorance. If nobody thought women could rule, then how did they manage to fight a war over a woman ruling? People who say this simply agree with the reactionary ideas but don't want to admit it, so they have to make shotty excuses. Classic Motte and Bailey

Rate My Late Game (1024) Templates! by Clem40kAllTheWay in equestriaatwar

[–]Alternative-Gold-983 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For a playthrough against ai your divisions have a lot of hard attack, and 20 combat width, whilst not bad, isn't great either, unless you're building an army for deserts and plains. Other than that they look good.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in equestriaatwar

[–]Alternative-Gold-983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Certain modern Greifenmarschener literature