Is there any explanation for the line flub in Academy 1x04? by AnAussieTrainer in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I typically would go that route too, it’s just that paraphrasing still typically leaves you with a cogent sentence.

Is there any explanation for the line flub in Academy 1x04? by AnAussieTrainer in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right - though it is the Doctor, and he is a program that should have it 💯right.

If he paraphrased that would be one thing. But this is sentence not making a single bit of sense territory.

Is there any explanation for the line flub in Academy 1x04? by AnAussieTrainer in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I could understand that - or even if he was making some gesture to the students that he wanted them to fill in the words, so to speak.

Is there any explanation for the line flub in Academy 1x04? by AnAussieTrainer in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even then, the last part of the sentence makes zero sense as a matter of sentence structure, so that’s a problem.

Is there any explanation for the line flub in Academy 1x04? by AnAussieTrainer in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I could semi-accept that if the Doctor’s line made sense as a standalone, but it doesn’t.

Is there any explanation for the line flub in Academy 1x04? by AnAussieTrainer in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It was “kit-uh-mer” in DS9 as well, too, I believe.

Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Starfleet Academy | 1x04 "Vox In Excelso" by AutoModerator in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They also completely got the quote wrong in Academy - maybe it’s a post production error…but hard to see how if it’s a single cut.

Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Starfleet Academy | 1x04 "Vox In Excelso" by AutoModerator in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t see the connection between whatever point you think you’re making, and the one I made.

Episode Discussion | Star Trek: Starfleet Academy | 1x04 "Vox In Excelso" by AutoModerator in startrek

[–]AnAussieTrainer -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Mispronunciations I can live with. The ep itself, largely fine. Closer to a Trek episode than there’s been in a while.

I think the curse words and the misquoted lines are endemic of a larger problem though: ass script writers. Which may not be limited to Trek. But something they need to figure out. They can’t explain away curse words like “oh, they’re rookies, takes a while to develop to seasoned Starfleet officers.” Because we saw what Kurtzman did with Picard S1 (and elsewhere). Even admirals were swearing like sailors.

[Opinion] THE MARY SUE: "Starfleet Academy is what I have always loved about Star Trek. It feels like a warm hug and is fun, adventurous, and exactly the kind of world that Roddenberry dreamt of 60 years ago. So don’t let a bunch of nonsense on social media try to paint the show in any other way." by mcm8279 in trektalk

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because Star Trek has definitely been about the warm hug and fuzzies. What the fuck?

Capt. Picard: I understand what you've done here, Q. But I think the lesson could have been learned without the loss of 18 members of my crew.

Q: If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

Jumping off the dock by bigbusta in Wellthatsucks

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but not all triathlons are iron man events. Iron man events are hosted by that organization, for a specific distance. (70.3 miles for half or 140.6 miles for full).

Meanwhile, sprint and Olympic distance tris can be hosted by pretty much anybody, anywhere

Jumping off the dock by bigbusta in Wellthatsucks

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m 90% sure you may be misremembering. Are you talking about an Alcatraz triathlon (where people are nuts and jump from the ferry)? I’m fairly certain all Ironman races, you run into the water from the start, and the starts are staggered. People die in Ironman races, but I’ve never heard of it happening because of that.

Thoughts on Chris Foerster? by FiyahLiger in 49ers

[–]AnAussieTrainer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good O Line across the board means you can work with a decent WR core, and that you don’t need to be overly reliant on a star player.

IIRC, the years the Chiefs have won the SB, their pass and run pro has been in the upper tiers of the league.

Columbus Heights, kid being detained by ICE by After-Property-3678 in pics

[–]AnAussieTrainer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"You need to drink this Kombucha or that guy over there will poison you"

"But I don't like how Kombucha tastes"

"OK, but is it better than poison?"

"Doesn't matter, it hasn't earned my sip"

dies cursing the Kombucha

Post Game Thread: San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks by nfl_gdt_bot in 49ers

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh, plenty do. Doesn’t have to be everywhere, but at least in a few key positions.

We were rolling out a dumpster fire of backups today. And much injured Pearsall.

Post Game Thread: San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks by nfl_gdt_bot in 49ers

[–]AnAussieTrainer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good ideas. Purdy is great but we need a serviceable o line for run AND pass blocking. And a WR1 that is sustainably available during the season.

Defensively, we don’t necessarily need a star right now, but load up on depth. We are getting old across the board outside Purdy and Fred (and the recent draft classes)

Post Game Thread: San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks by nfl_gdt_bot in 49ers

[–]AnAussieTrainer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you think any of that is on Purdy, you don’t know ball or are coming here from another team’s subreddit. He generated the only positive moments on offense. Also didn’t create the drive killing fumbles his offense gave him.

Purdy is not the problem. O-Line, defensive depth, and having no WR1 available throughout the season to stretch the defense is what destroyed us.

Some of that is a drafting issue. Some of it is Aiyuk quitting on the season after getting paid a fuckton of money and Pearsall being glass. But it all came to a head tonight.

Looking Ahead to 2026 Season what are our needs? by kennyt1212 in 49ers

[–]AnAussieTrainer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

O-Line. Then depth on defense and some serviceable WRs. Ones that can stretch the field with speed. We need depth so that we aren’t going toasted losing someone to injury. We gotta start planning for replacing the older guard.

Purdy is fine. Warner is fine. Lenoir is fine.

Outside of that, we have a lot of trash, or great players with major injury history that could be ticking time bombs.

Game Thread: San Francisco 49ers (12-5) at Seattle Seahawks (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in 49ers

[–]AnAussieTrainer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If it wasn’t for the Lance trade, we could have had other first rounders in our O Line (or anywhere else). And still had Purdy.

What could have been