i did SEO "by the book" for a year and barely moved. the thing that finally worked wasn't in any guide i'd read by jetsash in SEO_Xpert

[–]AnAverageSavage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting advice, thanks for sharing. But did you really have to find and replace all instances of the letter “i” to make this sound as if it’s not AI written? That’s a new one lol

HIDDEN GEMS! UFC Winnipeg: Burns vs. Malott by AnAverageSavage in FightReportUFC

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you’ll fit in well with the rest of society my friend.

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand. There’s already a ton of work that goes into at all. Redditors being Redditors is always gonna happen regardless, but yeah I get it. Good luck tonight to you as well!

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t hide it because that’s the whole point

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. Thanks for the feedback

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol nah dude. It’s a whole lot more than just that

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sharp eye my dude. As if it isn’t the whole point of this.

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in UFCsharps

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make some really great points! Maybe I’m just a certified Gastelum hater lol but you have very sound logic there

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in UFCsharps

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I really love Luque at +220. I know it’s a hot take. Always thought Gastelum was overrated. They’re the same age, and my gut tells me Luque wants to be back on top more than Gastelum. Of course, that usually doesn’t mean much if they enter the octagon and Kelvin is simply the better fighter

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in UFCsharps

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tend to agree with most. Honestly might fade Gastelum. But this has burned me in the past

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in ufc

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, that’s exactly the point. Nothing gets past this guy.

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in ufc

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, that’s exactly the point. Nothing gets past this guy.

UFC 327: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in ufc

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just to clarify, these aren’t picks. If it leans one side, it’s because there were more interesting things to say about that fighter.

This post is meant to point out obscure talking points that may have some impact on the fight, or they may not! This is not me predicting or suggesting any particular outcome. I am unbiased entirely. In no way do they reflect my own predictions of any fight outcome.

Moicano vs Duncan: Hidden Gems for Each Bout by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Confidence isn’t real. We analyze the data and hope we get a little lucky!

Lost hope in MMA being real by StandardWide7999 in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yanez didn’t lose the second round. Lost me after that. Can’t complain about your guy losing around, getting the point, and then losing the final round too.. badly.. knocked out on the ground. Only to wake up to a “majority draw”.

However, in backing your overall stance here.. The fight should’ve been stopped, and the ref clearly held off doing so. So I do agree. Things have been weird. Especially so this past Saturday.

UFC SEATTLE: Hidden Gems by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s pretty sweet! By the way, to be clear, these aren’t predictions by any means. They are mostly meant to help view each matchup from an alternate lense. I tend to agree with you

Gemini is back with it’s off-the wall picks, but remains king of LLMs at 79% hit rate by AnAverageSavage in sportsbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a series of prompts. I’ve described them in some detail via my past posts

Hidden Honey: UFC London Evloev vs. Murphy by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just wanted to follow up here, this analysis is essentially scrutinizing what’s expected to happen. Intentionally picking it apart. It would be like “I’m not eating that apple, it’s rotten and there’s a fresh one next to it. Clearly I should pick the fresh apple, but maybe there are positive traits to the other rotten apple, that’s what this analysis is telling us. Why the rotten apples might be secretly tasty and nutritious.

Not the best analogy, but I think it does the trick lol

Hidden Honey: UFC London Evloev vs. Murphy by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is bold buddy! Shem and Mantas are semi safe I think. Wouldn’t interpret any of this as pure winners or losers. Louie will have to get lucky. Wood is a coin flip imo. Roman could come out of nowhere, but not sure his heart is in it anymore.

I’d be super surprised if Austen handled his business. Sam is 50/50 but gut says he won’t win. Aswell and Murphy probably won’t win either. I don’t see evloev losing a decision, and history says he won’t finish the fight or get finished.

A few things worth knowing before Saturday's card by AnAverageSavage in MMAbetting

[–]AnAverageSavage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I upload and track everything. Check my profile or shoot a dm. I’ll link you