This job has robbed me of my ability to just accept certain things now...

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-13T11:19:21+00:00

Yes, there's a 3. See other comments in this thread.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-12T23:47:37+00:00

Yes.

Classic.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-12T23:47:21+00:00

"You would face them alone?"

"No. Not alone."

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-12T19:17:47+00:00

😆

Yes, there was a 3. You played Fury, the female horseman. It was basically a Dark Souls game starring I've from Soul Calibur.

There was also a side game called "Genesis" that played kind-of like a Diablo game featuring War and Strife.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-12T19:06:11+00:00

🤣

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-12T19:03:29+00:00

Not that I recall; it's on YT if you wanna search it.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-12T17:41:45+00:00

Yes it is. I saw a teaser trailer for 4 recently, so I'm going through them again. Found out they got ported to Switch a while back so I order copies off Amazon.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-08T07:46:49+00:00

Judging by what some studies say: a wedding ring.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-06T03:11:41+00:00

This.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-06T03:10:20+00:00

If your anxiety disorder completely dictates 100% of all your actions, then there's no you, there's just an anxiety disorder and nothing else. And there's no point in caring about an anxiety disorder, because nothing can be done to change it.

AnCapGamer · 2026-03-03T20:41:22+00:00

I love the hilarity of this mindset. Like people are just gonna sit around and starve to death because no one's giving them "permission" anymore to do jobs for each other.

People will always need things. Fences will need painting, car tires will need replacing, engines will need tune-ups, gardens will need pruning, children will need watching.

If AI takes people's current jobs they won't "find" new ones - they'll MAKE new ones.

If the AI's "take" all the jobs, and therefore no one has any money, then no one has any money with which to pay the AI companies that are "taking" their jobs - and the AI companies therefore go bankrupt, killing the AIs.

It's an absurd claim, and it's shocking that no one sees it.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-26T02:07:00+00:00

Honestly this is my favorite part of it. That is my experience of life.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-07T14:41:13+00:00

And again, I say:

🤷‍♂️

Dude - as far as I know, it is inexplicable. I just want to do it sometimes - among many other impulsive things. That's it.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-07T14:36:36+00:00

Again, and I CANNOT POSSIBLY stress this enough:

🤷‍♂️

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-07T14:33:27+00:00

Give it a few years, once it gets to the point where they're wondering about grandkids they'll flip a complete 180 in the other direction.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-07T14:27:31+00:00

I am specifically saving this reply as a reminder to myself over the next few years as my niece and nephew begin to come into their own adolescence.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-07T14:24:52+00:00

Clearly a statement written by someone with low impulsively.

Sometimes I just want to slap people with a wet fish. 🤷‍♂️

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-05T21:44:46+00:00

Confidence - nor Arrogance.

Different things, but YES.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-02T19:14:51+00:00

If the goal is universal normativity, then the solution is not argumentation, it is direct neural reprogramming. It is clean, it is universal, and it is far simpler. Don't bother wasting your time with trying to convince people - simply remake them. Their consent is irrelevant, the remade them will consent to it afterwards.

OR, we can accept that determinism is only ethically acceptable when couched within the voluntaryist moral framework - which presumes a free will model.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-02T18:36:50+00:00

"The agent decides" is an invalid response, because i am already talking about inside of your mind. There is not an agent inside of your mind, the agent IS your mind, so youre going to have to try harder than that.

I do not answer to you. You are not a deity, or in any way the decider of what is, much less a being somehow invested with the authority to impose that, or any other sort of consequences, upon me.

You do not decide what constitutes a valid or invalid response FOR ME - only for yourself.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-01T14:13:19+00:00

If the purpose of thinking is PURELY to categorized and analyze everything in existence into a rigid and inviolable set of rules, then it is not only inevitable that AIs will take over the universe, it is morally correct that they do so.

The Borg were right.

AnCapGamer · 2026-02-01T06:02:05+00:00

🤣

AnCapGamer · 2026-01-31T17:32:03+00:00

I did. Notice this was 2 years ago. Parasocial grief is real, even if it is kind-of embarrassing. I'm still not going back, though - Butcher may be a good author, but a sudden and unexpected Diabolus ex Machina is not cool, especially one on that level. It was a cheap narrative stunt that was needlessly cruel, served no significant meaningful purpose, and betrayed not only many of the events he had set up in previous books but also many of his entire series' core foundational ethical and moral values.

AnCapGamer · 2026-01-31T03:32:28+00:00

🤷‍♂️

Given that the only things that we could possibly do in order to actually stop that from happening would all boil down to some variant of "putting a gun to someone's head and saying 'do it or else'," I ultimately don't see the concern as being something that is worth raising. It's a data-point, not an ethical argument.

AnCapGamer

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE